Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

New Highest output EVO

 
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #16  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Big props to Andrew@Dyno4mance. Next time the rad will have to come out [inside joke]
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 06:30 AM
  #17  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Dyno4mance
Do you think you can over octane an application?
Essentially, octane refers to the speed in which the fuel burns. In our case, fuels that generally pack more energy per mass unit typically have a higher octane, which necessitates more spark advance to synchronize its slower burn time with the compression stroke. I suppose you can 'over octane' an application if so much spark lead is required that it interferes with the mechanical timing, but I don't think that's realistic.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #18  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
i think there have been instances where an ignition system couldn't handle super high octane and lots of boost/air. you will get a really rich mix and lots of black smoke.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:33 AM
  #19  
Dyno4mance's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
From: NW Georgia
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
i think there have been instances where an ignition system couldn't handle super high octane and lots of boost/air. you will get a really rich mix and lots of black smoke.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:41 AM
  #20  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
happened to my Z. and a few other Z cars. the stock ignition system couldnt' handle the slow burning high octane fuel so a lot of it went through the motor unburnt. of course, i didn't adjust my ignition timing....so that may very well have been the reason.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #21  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
and FWIW it was 1 gal of 93 octane, and 6 gals of c16
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:47 AM
  #22  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
In that case, it's likely that the fuel didn't complete the burn cycle until in was in your exhaust system, in which case you certainly aren't gettings the benefits of it at the very least.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:54 AM
  #23  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
yes, exactly. my stock ignition system didn't seem to be able to handle the octane
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:11 AM
  #24  
CupertinoSteve's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: 2003 - Evo VIII, 1999 Subaru RS
if you had better control of your ignition and fuel system and were running higher octane ... you should have been able lean out the mixture and advance the spark to get the power out of your engine. but what do I know ... I'm NOT a tuner, just a monkey. I should really leave this to the professional.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:36 AM
  #25  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
LOL. i didn't really have any way of controlling the ignition timing.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:40 AM
  #26  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
In that case, higher octane fuel wouldn't have benefited you much anyway. Typically, factory programming does not allow more spark advance than is advantageous to run anything much above pump premium.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:51 AM
  #27  
YEVOVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
What year EVO was this?
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #28  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
Originally Posted by Ted B
In that case, higher octane fuel wouldn't have benefited you much anyway. Typically, factory programming does not allow more spark advance than is advantageous to run anything much above pump premium.
it allowed me to run A LOT more boost without any detonation. the octane was just too high in that particular case.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #29  
evotoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by YEVOVIII
What year EVO was this?
2003 with a little over 7000 miles.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #30  
David@Vishnu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
it allowed me to run A LOT more boost without any detonation. the octane was just too high in that particular case.
But without proper fuel control you were injecting as much high octane as pump gas essentially drowning it

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 AM.