would you guys attribute the lower tq to the 10.5 hotside, or maybe theres still a bit laying on the table, ie: diff cam settings, and further tuning possibilities?
ill see if i can find someone to post up my graph in abit, no problems with it, its nice and flat, just seems low, comparatively speaking.
all in all, i think im heading in the right direction for what i want.

 

Those numbers may very well be a reflection of how (and when) the dyno is putting a load on the car. If you look at the dyno curves for Evos on DynoJet vs. DynoDynamics vs. Mustang, you'll see that generally the shape varies from one dyno type to another. FWIW, I've noticed that DD and Mustang dynos seem to generate flatter curves (read: lower tq vs. hp curves) than the DynoJets (almost even tq vs. hp numbers).

l8r)