Installed header AFR leaned out
wow that graph looks super odd. Usually torque peaks a lot earlier than that unless you messed with the boost tables. I think you'd net a lot more torque if you didn't hinder the boost.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
different dynos different results, BTW that graph is not my car mine did 339whp on a Mustang in Dallas. Dyna packs and Dynojets give similar high peak torque figures low in the rpm range.
I'd rather have ~315ftlb from 4k to 5k. I'll leave those high peak tq numbers to BT VW 1.8Ts
I'd rather have ~315ftlb from 4k to 5k. I'll leave those high peak tq numbers to BT VW 1.8Ts
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Thanks for the tip Phillip, but the boost is at 100% about 25 psi the 16g will not put out more. My cams were at -4/-1.5 at the time reason for that TQ curve to be like that.
This may not be the best setup for quick spoolup but gives my car great vacuum at idle, therefore runs great in city rush hour traffic. Stop and go traffic with a/c on when brakes are used kills vacuum and stalls engine some times with -3/-3 or any combo of 110 LSA or less. And it always happens in the worst circumstances! I hope XEDE idle stability control is implemented soon since my car always wants to adapt out idle screw adjustments and always returns to 850 rpm.
This may not be the best setup for quick spoolup but gives my car great vacuum at idle, therefore runs great in city rush hour traffic. Stop and go traffic with a/c on when brakes are used kills vacuum and stalls engine some times with -3/-3 or any combo of 110 LSA or less. And it always happens in the worst circumstances! I hope XEDE idle stability control is implemented soon since my car always wants to adapt out idle screw adjustments and always returns to 850 rpm.




