Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Please look at data log and tell me what you think...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #61  
Sackett's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
looking at this post from shiv, he is basically saying that you have to tune your AFR yourself, and the smart will simply compensate for changes in conditions to keep thos AFRs in a 'safe range'

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
To disable the SMART fuel table, simply put -100 in all the cells in the Fuel Threshold table. This way, it will not interfere with your tuning. Only after you are done dialing in the MAF/fuel table should you reset it back to the way it was before.

As for tuning from here on. Simply raise the boost a bit at a time, while making sure your AFR is in-line. Shoot for low 11s on pump gas and you'll be fine. After you are done, reset your threshold table back to normal and let it do realtime corrections for you as conditions change.

Shiv
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 03:39 PM
  #62  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by Sackett
actually, the CReader does perform a (sometimes necessary) task.

If you search the forums and read up on the P0300 random misfire trouble code, you will find that somewhere, the CReader is mentioned. I remember almost exactly what shiv said about it:
'leaving the CReader plugged in seems to disable a diagnostic check that generates the P0300 code' (not a quote, but thats the gist of it)

You will also find some members had NOTICABLE misfires when this code came up, and after plugging in the CReader the misfires actually stopped. Coincidence or ignorance? maybe. but thats what was said about it.
I'm well aware of the P0300 code issues. However, if you leave the unit plugged in ALL the time, you're likely to miss other DTC's that might appear. That's not something I'm willing to do at this point. I'm lucky and don't have P0300 issues, but if I did I'd explore a solution that was more interactive.

d
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #63  
Sackett's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
I thought shiv said that it would not clear other codes automatically. or at least the CEL would come on so you know to check the reader...

But in any case, of course i agree with you completely. it is not an acceptable long term fix.
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #64  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by Sackett
I thought shiv said that it would not clear other codes automatically. or at least the CEL would come on so you know to check the reader...

But in any case, of course i agree with you completely. it is not an acceptable long term fix.
As soon as the CReader is powered, it reads the codes 4 times, then clears them. The Check engine light might still come one for the first minute of driving or so, but will then go off. If this always happens, will you always check? If you always check, then don't you want something a little more slick than a 50 dollar scantool?


...of course, that's just my point of view. I'm sure it's more than adequate for a lot of peolple. I'm just **** about those things.

d
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #65  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by donour
I'm well aware of the P0300 code issues. However, if you leave the unit plugged in ALL the time, you're likely to miss other DTC's that might appear. That's not something I'm willing to do at this point. I'm lucky and don't have P0300 issues, but if I did I'd explore a solution that was more interactive.

d
All primary codes (the important ones) are displayed and unsurpressed. It's on the PO300 codes which seem to be kept quiet. The C-Reader just keeps the stock ECU from completing that particular diagnostic cycle. I have yet to see the C-Reader hide something that should be there in the first place. Once Mitsu fixes this problem themselves, we'll figure out if the C-Reader is needed. But until then, I suggest using it.

Shiv
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #66  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
All primary codes (the important ones) are displayed and unsurpressed. It's on the PO300 codes which seem to be kept quiet. The C-Reader just keeps the stock ECU from completing that particular diagnostic cycle.
Really? That's particularly good news. I had no idea! Where's the difference? Does the stock ECU just do different diagnostics with a scantool attached or is there some bit of cleverness in the CReader that is not documented in the user manual?


d
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #67  
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
CREADER was wasted cash for those of us without the p0300 code and especially for those of us who already had a scan tool.
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #68  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by EVIL_EV0
CREADER was wasted cash for those of us without the p0300 code and especially for those of us who already had a scan tool.
That's a little extreme. It's still a handy tool. Stick it in your glove box, you'll be happy you have it at some point. If you already have several in there already (*cough* me *cough*) then put it in your grandmother's glove box. It'll save her a trip to the dealer someday.

I don't fault vishnu's policy to include it with every kit -- even for those of us fortunate enough to live code-free.

d
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #69  
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Maybe....
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #70  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
I too find the CREADER an unacceptable/uncomfortable "patch". Basically I'm willing to bite the bullet on having to wait for the Xede to load prior to starting the car, but that is at my extreme limit of compromise. I really, really want SMART with all it's advertised features. However, at this point, I'm confused as to which ones are "future" features and which ones are actual active features. For instance, I was to the understanding that the active fueling/timing had a plus or minus authority range, now it seem Shiv is saying that only the negative timing authority range is currently available?
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29 PM.