Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

VISHNU Help with 10 table map

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:00 AM
  #1  
RREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Jax
VISHNU Help with 10 table map

Hi question for Vishnu crew , I am about to purchase the alcohol injection and cant seem to run the 10 table map with alcohol control and run lean protection whatever I try my car seems to throw a lean condition on hard acceleration and during shifts so I am asking you guys if you can send me a V390 10 table map for 93 oct. or if you guys wont too see my map that I'm trying too run I can post it here thanks .
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:11 AM
  #2  
Dustin@Vishnu's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, Ca
What exactly do you mean by "throwing a lean condition?"
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
RREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Jax
Originally Posted by Dustin@Vishnu
What exactly do you mean by "throwing a lean condition?"
It studers violently on wot and the best I can explain is when I go wot till 7000rpm let off throttle shift back on throttle it hits I think it is a lean condition
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
Dustin@Vishnu's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, Ca
I would imagine that it is the lean protect. Zero out the table for now, and let us work on it a bit more.
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
RREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Jax
Originally Posted by Dustin@Vishnu
I would imagine that it is the lean protect. Zero out the table for now, and let us work on it a bit more.
Ok thanks Dustin and please let me know when you find the solution .
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
We already found it. It's going to require a lean run condition of a finite length of time. Perhaps .25 seconds. Just something longer than what it is now (instantaneous). This will keep it from being falsely triggered while still protecting the engine. The software engineers and I are going to work on it during SEMA week (1st week of Nov). Coming soon....

shiv
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #7  
Rushin's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
will it help if you set the LM Programmer to average samples over a period of time vs instantenious readout?
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
It could help but at the cost of response time for normal SMART fuel adjustments. The whole idea is to make it as real-time as possible. That is first priority. We would not want the leanrun protect feature to interfere with that

Shiv

Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Oct 20, 2005 at 09:55 AM.
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 07:49 AM
  #9  
freedom's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
I tried that and not only didn't it work, it negatively affects the performance of the SMART fuel system (as cited by Shiv.) Suppressing the lean run detection for a period of time is really different than integrating up a number of samples. I believe this is because the change in AFR is rather large during a shift.

Originally Posted by Rushin
will it help if you set the LM Programmer to average samples over a period of time vs instantenious readout?
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 PM.