Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

is vishnu worth it??

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #31  
yldMr2006's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: danville, ca
i'm happy with v380... it brought me a tropy [first prize] winning the last weds night drags at infineon raceway... check this link..


http://www.infineonraceway.com/news/...ws/514295.html


looking forward for more vishnu upgrades...
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #32  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
Originally Posted by yldMr2006
i'm happy with v380... it brought me a tropy [first prize] winning the last weds night drags at infineon raceway... check this link..


http://www.infineonraceway.com/news/...ws/514295.html


looking forward for more vishnu upgrades...

you made a 13.5 which is kind of low why??
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #33  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Uhhh I know for a fact the V400 is good for at least 65WHP and about the same for torque. The car is completely changed. Even faster than my Stage 1+ 03 Evo. Check dyno sheet... baseline was with exhaust already installed.

For the poster who said his stock SE was as fast as his friends V380 IX, there has to be something wrong with his friends car.

Best $750 I ever gave Shiv =)
Attached Thumbnails is vishnu worth it??-dyno2.jpg  
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #34  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
My sig says it all - we'll have another round of Shiv this Spring @ TurboTrix
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 05:02 PM
  #35  
Quickshifter's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: LA, SD
Originally Posted by tuffguy
2nd gear is actually fairly long and due to the gearing ratio the torque differences should be more apparent. Regardless, if it has that much more power, you should be able to tell a difference if you're cruising side by side and you both stomp the go fast pedal at the same time. There's no way that a "380hp" Evo and a stock Evo should be identical.

Anyway, I've thread crapped enough.
2nd gear is actually fairly long.........wow.
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #36  
tuffguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: CA
Originally Posted by Quickshifter
2nd gear is actually fairly long.........wow.
1st gear is 40mph. 2nd gear is 20mph. 3rd gear is 20mph. 4th gear is 25mph.

You can be in 2nd gear at 2500rpm and do a full pull to 60mph. That's long enough.

Now, what are you basing your response on?
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #37  
tuffguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: CA
Originally Posted by boostedwrx
Uhhh I know for a fact the V400 is good for at least 65WHP and about the same for torque. The car is completely changed. Even faster than my Stage 1+ 03 Evo. Check dyno sheet... baseline was with exhaust already installed.

For the poster who said his stock SE was as fast as his friends V380 IX, there has to be something wrong with his friends car.

Best $750 I ever gave Shiv =)
I believe that it was installed by Shiv himself, and it's been running this way since it was done. I don't know if they took it for a test drive afterwards.

Is that your dyno? Is that the same flash with the same maps that is used for a car that is stock?

EDIT: Btw, you do know that a substantial part of the gain is from the removal of the pill in the vacuum line which increases boost by ~2psi. I can tell you from my car, removing the pill probably gives the biggest gains.

It would be interesting to see a dyno of the following:
1) Completely stock
2) With flash
3) With flash and pill removal
4) With flash and passive boost emulator

Last edited by tuffguy; Nov 16, 2006 at 05:51 PM.
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM.