SAFC Heaven
Your really something man- but I figured out your problem ...............you cant read. Never would I claim that an EM system no matter how neanderthal wouldnt need to be tuned. Never did I claim that the cromagnon SAFC controlled boost Of course it doesnt
(In fact four posts ago I claimed you were using plumbers parts for an MBC). The safe power comes with the resolution and power of the tool (knock attenuation, RPMdependant boost, timing control
, tons of load cells, Though 8 is too many for you.
Buschurs exhaust is made from pipes from home depot I had one I then promptly sold it
Its hard I know but ponder the question (nude on the pot if you like) that the factory intake is no restriction for a big 16 g.
(In fact four posts ago I claimed you were using plumbers parts for an MBC). The safe power comes with the resolution and power of the tool (knock attenuation, RPMdependant boost, timing control
, tons of load cells, Though 8 is too many for you.Buschurs exhaust is made from pipes from home depot I had one I then promptly sold it
Its hard I know but ponder the question (nude on the pot if you like) that the factory intake is no restriction for a big 16 g.
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
A) Both the EXEDE and SAFC have to be tuned to run properly. You obviously don't know what your talking about.
B) SAFC doesen't control boost. You obviously don't know what your talking about.
c) Any tuner can create a safe power level. You obviously don't know what your talking about?
So your making 400whp with the stock turbo? Back your claims up with facts. Buschur's exhaust out flows the competition, his intake is 3 inches. How are you possibly going to make more power than him using vishnu's parts?
A) Both the EXEDE and SAFC have to be tuned to run properly. You obviously don't know what your talking about.
B) SAFC doesen't control boost. You obviously don't know what your talking about.
c) Any tuner can create a safe power level. You obviously don't know what your talking about?
So your making 400whp with the stock turbo? Back your claims up with facts. Buschur's exhaust out flows the competition, his intake is 3 inches. How are you possibly going to make more power than him using vishnu's parts?
You aren't looking for answers because if you were you would have found them. The mechanism of the XEDE and the advantages of it and load-bearing dyno tuning have been discussed repeatedly here and elsewhere. It's to the point where I have to wonder whether anyone still angrily confused about it is in denial or just tragically illiterate. At the very least if you cannot grasp why an S-AFC isn't going to give you the flexibility of an XEDE; if you cannot grasp why you don't want to couple timing advance to fuel tuning, then I fear sharing the road with you because I fear you may be blind.
Like a booster chair?
I remember about 10 years ago I was looking for some computer speakers and some guy wanted to make a me a great deal on a 400W amp/speaker set-up ... for about $30. I almost **** myself and jumped on it and only later would I learn what PMPO measurements were good for. The lesson learned there was that anyone can make impressive power for a fraction of a second.
If you really want answers, you're going to have to look at more than just maxima; more than just area under the curve. And you're going to have to want to hear them.
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
DON'T RESPOND UNLESS YOU CAN BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE.
DON'T RESPOND UNLESS YOU CAN BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE.
I remember about 10 years ago I was looking for some computer speakers and some guy wanted to make a me a great deal on a 400W amp/speaker set-up ... for about $30. I almost **** myself and jumped on it and only later would I learn what PMPO measurements were good for. The lesson learned there was that anyone can make impressive power for a fraction of a second.
If you really want answers, you're going to have to look at more than just maxima; more than just area under the curve. And you're going to have to want to hear them.
What gives a **** John Force has a fast car. What have YOU done?
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
Check my last post. AMS's EVO2 is amazing. Their also very nice guys. Very outgoing with information. I was in E-Town when they made their 9 second pass.
Check my last post. AMS's EVO2 is amazing. Their also very nice guys. Very outgoing with information. I was in E-Town when they made their 9 second pass.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Okay. Our favorite Suzuki salesman philosopher has been thread banned. Arguing with him, and Turbo Weapon, is a lost cause. Can't argue with someone who doesn't comprehend your argument or can't accept the fact that he just might be wrong. Oh well... it was interesting reading their posts. Kinda like watching a train wreck happen right in front of you. EZ and MP5 deserve an award for the most amusing posts I've ever read 
Cheers
shiv

Cheers
shiv
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
Keep in mind John Force doesen't develop the parts and tune his own car. He is also using a platform with 50 years of development under its hood. How many hand-built not sponsored evolutions are running 9-second times.
I don't tune cars for a living. Although I do all my own mods (except for my clutch). I build and blew up a 290whp Civic if that counts for something.
I don't profess to be the know-all, nor do I want to be deemed as one. I just don't approve of unsubstantiated posts with no emperical evidence. Just accusations and stupid attempts at humor. I went with Buschur parts because they answer the phone, and know ALOT more than 90% of the tuners.
Comparing the EXEDE to the SAFC is like comparing a Titleist driver to a Callaway driver (golf clubs). It only matters who is using the hardware in these instances. Both clubs have their pluses and minuses, but it's mostly about personal preferences.
You haven't given a single fact or reason why the simplistic and easy to use SAFC is FAR inferior to the EXEDE. Better yet, you make the proposterous accusation that the SAFC leads to blown head gaskets and blown engines.
Keep in mind John Force doesen't develop the parts and tune his own car. He is also using a platform with 50 years of development under its hood. How many hand-built not sponsored evolutions are running 9-second times.
I don't tune cars for a living. Although I do all my own mods (except for my clutch). I build and blew up a 290whp Civic if that counts for something.

I don't profess to be the know-all, nor do I want to be deemed as one. I just don't approve of unsubstantiated posts with no emperical evidence. Just accusations and stupid attempts at humor. I went with Buschur parts because they answer the phone, and know ALOT more than 90% of the tuners.
Comparing the EXEDE to the SAFC is like comparing a Titleist driver to a Callaway driver (golf clubs). It only matters who is using the hardware in these instances. Both clubs have their pluses and minuses, but it's mostly about personal preferences.
You haven't given a single fact or reason why the simplistic and easy to use SAFC is FAR inferior to the EXEDE. Better yet, you make the proposterous accusation that the SAFC leads to blown head gaskets and blown engines.
Keep in mind John Force doesen't develop the parts and tune his own car. Wrong
Lastly your a very concrete thinker I would expect a more dialectic veiw and a piece of metal on the end of a stick might be a good comparison for 8 channels of fuel correction but not for tuning a car
Last edited by MP5; Jan 1, 2004 at 06:55 PM.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
Respond to my comment shiv...The best you can do is ban me?
You haven't given a single fact or reason why the simplistic and easy to use SAFC is FAR inferior to the EXEDE. Better yet, you make the proposterous accusation that the SAFC leads to blown head gaskets and blown engines.
Respond to my comment shiv...The best you can do is ban me?
You haven't given a single fact or reason why the simplistic and easy to use SAFC is FAR inferior to the EXEDE. Better yet, you make the proposterous accusation that the SAFC leads to blown head gaskets and blown engines.
This is not surprising given the fact that the XEDE, like all good examples of engine management, offers ignition control. Only someone with an incomplete understanding of basic engine theory would argue that ignition timing control is an unneccessary "frill" when it comes to tuning an engine.
Regards,
Shiv
PS. You are banned once again
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Now, 2 times that output is 1100-1120whp which, as far as I know, is a bit more than anyone else is claiming. In fact, I think Buschur's tube frame 7 second drag car "only" puts down around 750whp on a 2wd Dynojet, IIRC.
Now, 2 times that output is 1100-1120whp which, as far as I know, is a bit more than anyone else is claiming. In fact, I think Buschur's tube frame 7 second drag car "only" puts down around 750whp on a 2wd Dynojet, IIRC.
He seems to do ok, though.

Have you ever seen the car run, Shiv? It is a sight to see for sure.
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
Dave Buschur's RWD Talon uses a 2 speed powerglide transmission with a very lossy high stall torque converter. He doesn't use a lock-up converter, so there is a ton of driveline loss. More than you will ever see with a manual transmission, even with an AWD drivetrain attached to it.
He seems to do ok, though.
Have you ever seen the car run, Shiv? It is a sight to see for sure.
Dave Buschur's RWD Talon uses a 2 speed powerglide transmission with a very lossy high stall torque converter. He doesn't use a lock-up converter, so there is a ton of driveline loss. More than you will ever see with a manual transmission, even with an AWD drivetrain attached to it.
He seems to do ok, though.

Have you ever seen the car run, Shiv? It is a sight to see for sure.
Originally posted by DynoKing
I can, the SAFC is a POS and I know someone who had one and went for a ride in my evo and said it was super smooth. He said SAFC was not smooth at all and boost was all over the place.
I can, the SAFC is a POS and I know someone who had one and went for a ride in my evo and said it was super smooth. He said SAFC was not smooth at all and boost was all over the place.
I used an AFC on my car for a couple years before DSMLink came out. It worked great. Got my car running 12.5s. It was easy to tune on the fly. But it had some side affects, just as any MAF frequency adjuster will have. I much prefer tuning inside the ECU.


