EcuFlash 1.44 and Mode 23 DoMode Table
Jan 18, 2013, 09:27 AM
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EcuFlash 1.44 and Mode 23 DoMode Table
There is an Error in the definition files that came with EcuFlash 1.44. They do give credit to me for the definitions (goldenevo.com), but they changed them slightly to use the better bloblist style. That way you don't have to type in values.
In evo10base.xml
This:
Should be this:
The 00 byte is very important. The address points to two bytes. The first is always 0. So EcuFlash looks at the 0 byte and expects it to be 4D. It doesn't find 4D and says "No Match". This is a good thing, and it prevents you from bricking your ECU.
In evo10base.xml
This:
Code:
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x42 -> 0x52" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="42" />
<data name="enabled" value="52" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4B -> 0x5B" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="4B" />
<data name="enabled" value="5B" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4D -> 0x5D" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="4D" />
<data name="enabled" value="5D" />
</scaling>
Code:
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x42 -> 0x52" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="0042" />
<data name="enabled" value="0052" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4B -> 0x5B" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="004B" />
<data name="enabled" value="005B" />
</scaling>
<scaling name="Mode 23 - DoMode 0x4D -> 0x5D" storagetype="bloblist">
<data name="disabled" value="004D" />
<data name="enabled" value="005D" />
</scaling>
Jan 23, 2013, 01:55 AM
#6
I am using 53050106 and it works, but I have to re-install ECUflash and mod evo10 base file. You can enable by using + or -
Last edited by KingSoft; Jan 23, 2013 at 01:59 AM.
Trending Topics
Jan 25, 2013, 10:21 AM
#8
Evolved Member
I ditched all the definitions that came with 1.44 because they are formatted differently using inherit base, and I don't want to have to redo all my definitions. If you have a good xml already, you can use it instead of the one that came with the new version.
Jan 25, 2013, 12:31 PM
#9
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I might do that, I can't seam to get the RAX patch to show up and when they do all I can see is the RAX patch items (everything else disappears)
Jan 25, 2013, 12:53 PM
#10
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: pa
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrfred
ECU Flash
496
Sep 14, 2022 07:08 PM