Garrett V-band TwinScroll GTX3576r, Curt Brown 10:1 2L, R2's, 110octane, 573hp/439tq
#1
Garrett V-band TwinScroll GTX3576r, Curt Brown 10:1 2L, R2's, 110octane, 573hp/439tq
I want to share the new results with my R2 cams and running 110octane race fuel. Here is the general information regarding the setup. Also, find below the post to my build thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...xperiment.html
Engine
Curt Brown 10:1 2.0L
GSC R2's
Curt Brown ported head
Haltech Platinum Pro PnP
PTCS D200 Dash Logger
ACT 6-puck sprung with lightweight flywheel
Curt Brown Extreme Port intake with 70mm TB
1000cc Injectors
Squash Performance Double Pumper w/ Twin Walbro 400s
Custom SS hardlines
Turbo
Garrett V-band TwinScroll 1.01 a/r turbine housing
Garrett GTX3576r
Self fabricated custom top mount twinscroll setup
self fabricated 3.5" 321ss exhaust
Single Tial MV-R 44mm Wastegate
Tial QR 50mm BOV
Garrett 24.0" x 12.0" x 3.5" core (MPFAB tanks)
The previous dyno charts I posted were done on a Dynojet and the new runs were done on a SuperFlow Dyno, which reads ~10% lower than a DynoJet. Unfortunately, HIS Motorsports is not answering the phone so I had to seek a new dyno.
I previously made 505hp/430tq (DynoJet) on 93 octane, 33psi tapered to 31psi with timing 1deg@5K to 8deg@8k using S2's.
I am now making 573hp/439tq (SuperFlow) on 110octane, 37psi tapered to 33psi with timing 5deg@5k to 15deg@8k.
https://web1.eng.famu.fsu.edu/~jthag...run3_37psi.jpg
Here are the results converted by the SuperFlow dyno to read DynoJet "equivalent" numbers.
Next will be GTX SHOWDOWN Part II: GTX3576r vs. GTX3582r.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...xperiment.html
Engine
Curt Brown 10:1 2.0L
GSC R2's
Curt Brown ported head
Haltech Platinum Pro PnP
PTCS D200 Dash Logger
ACT 6-puck sprung with lightweight flywheel
Curt Brown Extreme Port intake with 70mm TB
1000cc Injectors
Squash Performance Double Pumper w/ Twin Walbro 400s
Custom SS hardlines
Turbo
Garrett V-band TwinScroll 1.01 a/r turbine housing
Garrett GTX3576r
Self fabricated custom top mount twinscroll setup
self fabricated 3.5" 321ss exhaust
Single Tial MV-R 44mm Wastegate
Tial QR 50mm BOV
Garrett 24.0" x 12.0" x 3.5" core (MPFAB tanks)
The previous dyno charts I posted were done on a Dynojet and the new runs were done on a SuperFlow Dyno, which reads ~10% lower than a DynoJet. Unfortunately, HIS Motorsports is not answering the phone so I had to seek a new dyno.
I previously made 505hp/430tq (DynoJet) on 93 octane, 33psi tapered to 31psi with timing 1deg@5K to 8deg@8k using S2's.
I am now making 573hp/439tq (SuperFlow) on 110octane, 37psi tapered to 33psi with timing 5deg@5k to 15deg@8k.
https://web1.eng.famu.fsu.edu/~jthag...run3_37psi.jpg
Here are the results converted by the SuperFlow dyno to read DynoJet "equivalent" numbers.
Next will be GTX SHOWDOWN Part II: GTX3576r vs. GTX3582r.
Last edited by 240Z TwinTurbo; May 18, 2023 at 10:57 AM.
#3
Had I dynoed the car at HIS I was hoping for ~560hp@wheels so 572hp makes me happy. The only thing that doesn't make sense if the dyno's are comparable is that I added significant timing/boost and gained 68hp, but only 9ft-lbs of torque.
Thank you again for you help....as always.
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
No doubt about that. Looking at the 76mm wheel compressor map, you're basically operating at PR = 3.5 and that wheel chokes out around 65lbs/min. The 82mm wheel will keep on going to 75lbs/min. I expect you'll gain about 100whp (using dynojet numbers) going to the GTX3582R.
#10
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Thanks for the killer price on the R2's and your advice for the ignition timing was spot on!
Had I dynoed the car at HIS I was hoping for ~560hp@wheels so 572hp makes me happy. The only thing that doesn't make sense if the dyno's are comparable is that I added significant timing/boost and gained 68hp, but only 9ft-lbs of torque.
Thank you again for you help....as always.
Had I dynoed the car at HIS I was hoping for ~560hp@wheels so 572hp makes me happy. The only thing that doesn't make sense if the dyno's are comparable is that I added significant timing/boost and gained 68hp, but only 9ft-lbs of torque.
Thank you again for you help....as always.
Thing looks terribly laggy now for some reason. It's not applying enough load, or something.
Just FWIW, the superflows seem to almost be a little more generous then even dynojets from what I've seen. A friend that worked for a company that had 3 dynos in house (mustang, dynojet, and superflow) told me the superflow consistently read the highest in all of their testing.
Last edited by 03whitegsr; Oct 4, 2013 at 01:37 PM.
#11
You are spooling 1000 RPM later on the superflow so you are likely missing the torque peak.
Thing looks terribly laggy now for some reason. It's not applying enough load, or something.
Just FWIW, the superflows seem to almost be a little more generous then even dynojets from what I've seen. A friend that worked for a company that had 3 dynos in house (mustang, dynojet, and superflow) told me the superflow consistently read the highest in all of their testing.
Thing looks terribly laggy now for some reason. It's not applying enough load, or something.
Just FWIW, the superflows seem to almost be a little more generous then even dynojets from what I've seen. A friend that worked for a company that had 3 dynos in house (mustang, dynojet, and superflow) told me the superflow consistently read the highest in all of their testing.
S2s - 30.0psi @ 5094rpm
R2s - 29.9psi @ 5278rpm
As far as the SuperFlow vs Dynojet, I have no reference. I was told prior to the dyno runs that I should expect a 10% lower number with their dyno vs DynoJet. Whether that is accurate I cannot say.
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Would be awsome of Aaron could overlay my dyno with a single scroll ams .63 3076 vs this.
At 4k I'm getting 17psi spike 31 by 5k
Eyeballing it 4k i'm at 230-40hp and 220-30 tq
Max out around 6500rpm and hitting 547whp @ 7400rpm
Max tq of 450 @ 6k
dynojet #'s
If only ER was closer i'd dyno again in this slightly cooler weather as the car feels abit stronger now, might even be close to 565
81.5F and 34% humidity in the dyno room.
At 4k I'm getting 17psi spike 31 by 5k
Eyeballing it 4k i'm at 230-40hp and 220-30 tq
Max out around 6500rpm and hitting 547whp @ 7400rpm
Max tq of 450 @ 6k
dynojet #'s
If only ER was closer i'd dyno again in this slightly cooler weather as the car feels abit stronger now, might even be close to 565
81.5F and 34% humidity in the dyno room.
Last edited by Grimgrak; Oct 4, 2013 at 09:53 PM.
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
The log shows the R2's spooled 184rpm slower vs the S2 when reaching 30psi.
S2s - 30.0psi @ 5094rpm
R2s - 29.9psi @ 5278rpm
As far as the SuperFlow vs Dynojet, I have no reference. I was told prior to the dyno runs that I should expect a 10% lower number with their dyno vs DynoJet. Whether that is accurate I cannot say.
S2s - 30.0psi @ 5094rpm
R2s - 29.9psi @ 5278rpm
As far as the SuperFlow vs Dynojet, I have no reference. I was told prior to the dyno runs that I should expect a 10% lower number with their dyno vs DynoJet. Whether that is accurate I cannot say.
MASSIVE smoothing would shift things like that and completely kill torque peak readings.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think your setup is responsible for the difference, I think they dyno sheets aren't at all comparable.
Last edited by 03whitegsr; Oct 5, 2013 at 11:02 AM.
#14
Don't know then as the dyno CLEARLY shows a massive delay in torque delivery. Peak torque looks to be around 5400RPM on the dynojet and 6400RPM on the superflow. Are those boost numbers from the dyno logs or street logs?
MASSIVE smoothing would shift things like that and completely kill torque peak readings.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think your setup is responsible for the difference, I think they dyno sheets aren't at all comparable.
MASSIVE smoothing would shift things like that and completely kill torque peak readings.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think your setup is responsible for the difference, I think they dyno sheets aren't at all comparable.
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Did you get your wastegate issue all sorted out. Do you have some street logs with a VDR, because that spoolup seems super lazy. I remember you had a log at one point in time that was 30psi at like 4k or something along those lines. Just wondering if you are still chasing other issues.