11' GSR Tuned by RRE 419/402 on E85
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
11' GSR Tuned by RRE 419/402 on E85
What's up guys, I had my 2011 Evo X GSR tuned by Rick @ Road Race Engineering recently and thought I would share my results. I feel like It's worth mentioning that it was a 103 degree day.
91: 356whp/350lb-ft @25psi
E85: 419whp/402lb-ft @24psi
Mods are as follows:
Invidia N1 catback
Speed circuit test pipe
MAP divorced wastegate downpipe
ETS intake w/heat shield
ETS UICP
ETS 4" intercooler
ID1000cc injectors
AEM 320lph fuel pump
Stage 2 competition clutch
Grimmspeed ebcs
Cosworth MX1 camshafts
91: 356whp/350lb-ft @25psi
E85: 419whp/402lb-ft @24psi
Mods are as follows:
Invidia N1 catback
Speed circuit test pipe
MAP divorced wastegate downpipe
ETS intake w/heat shield
ETS UICP
ETS 4" intercooler
ID1000cc injectors
AEM 320lph fuel pump
Stage 2 competition clutch
Grimmspeed ebcs
Cosworth MX1 camshafts
Last edited by Polov93; Aug 19, 2016 at 01:12 PM.
#7
Evolving Member
The numbers aren't "skewed" it's just what they read. Some dynos read higher than others. Doesn't make either one more right than wrong. Remember they are just a tool used for tuning.
Trending Topics
#8
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (12)
Rick and Mike take great pride in calibrating this particular dyno. I've spoken to them about it before and it does read a bit lower than your typical dynapack. However, one can adjust it to read whatever you want. They have chosen to keep the values reading as close as possible to the text book hp constant. They have also factored in mechanical friction losses.
1 Mechanical hp = 745.7 watts
People should not assume that just because it's a dynapack that the numbers are already too high. If anything, I would suspect that mustang dynos read too low, but again it does not matter as dynos are supposed to be used to measure differences in power, not actual values.
I personally prefer a dynapack because it takes tire/roller slippage out of the equation.
Ok good luck everybody and may the boost be with you.
-pal215
1 Mechanical hp = 745.7 watts
People should not assume that just because it's a dynapack that the numbers are already too high. If anything, I would suspect that mustang dynos read too low, but again it does not matter as dynos are supposed to be used to measure differences in power, not actual values.
I personally prefer a dynapack because it takes tire/roller slippage out of the equation.
Ok good luck everybody and may the boost be with you.
-pal215
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MinusPrevious
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
252
Dec 4, 2018 11:59 AM
740 Turbo Brick
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
59
Feb 10, 2018 03:27 PM
Moore Auto
Evo X Dyno Results
64
Apr 8, 2013 10:12 PM
Moore Auto
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
10
Feb 29, 2012 07:37 AM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
7
Oct 18, 2011 02:49 PM