Notices

SRT vs Lancer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #151  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Sconsin
Originally Posted by bigdoggy_dog
The average person on these forums doesn't spend all of his time around nothing but car enthusiasts either. So having to deal with the rest of society on a daily basis becomes a more prevelant issue. I know I'd get sick of trying to explain and defend my car all the time to people that don't know about sports cars. And hearing "It's just a neon" along with that would really annoy the hell out of me.
If I cared how the rest of society viewed my car purchases I wouldn't be driving a Evo, or any other Mitsubishi for that matter. I'd buy an Audi, BMW, Lexus or Acura.
The SRT-4 may just be a neon in your eyes, but it's a fast and fun to drive Neon, I'll take that over just a Lancer any day.
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #152  
sloty27's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
i kno the dodge dealer around me is very mod friendly..for me i would def a get srt over the ralliart..cus its much quicker and u can make those things pretty damn fast for a pretty good price..and srt-4s sound bad ***
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #153  
TheRaGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina



i really think that the srt 4 looks better, even though people say it looks horrible.
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #154  
TEXSRT4's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Ca
i have to agree! everyone makes fun of the srt's interior saying it looks plasticy, however, i look at the lancer and see plasticy body pannels. i would rather have my car have a plastic interior than a cheap plasticy look to the body
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 12:25 AM
  #155  
can04rali's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: edmonton A.B. Canada
Originally Posted by Ike
Once again, reading comprehension > you. I insulted your bacon and your Mitsubishi lineup, and it was a joke, lighten up. The only people knocking rides in here are the Ralliart fanbois insulting the SRT-4.
its a forum....its for ralliarts...thats how we roll.....get used to it.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 12:29 AM
  #156  
can04rali's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: edmonton A.B. Canada
Originally Posted by evo8rcr
now if this is true canada is the biggest bunch of f*cktards they are worse then cali. what is the source of your info?
dude I live in canada....tell you what ask any other canadian member on the site....anyone....they will tell you the exact same thing...no joke...it is retarded let me tell you, but at the same rate most of the time we can get away with alot of sh*t up here that you cant in Cali....like running our cars with no cats..I never made the bumper laws...but thats the way it is, other wise I woulda had an evo...but I ended up with Ralliart which actually has tons of potential....tons.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 12:37 AM
  #157  
can04rali's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: edmonton A.B. Canada
Originally Posted by Ike
but I give respect where it's due, and the SRT-4 has damn impressive performance for the price, the Ralliart is just a good car that's peppy.
I totally agree with what you say here...but there is alot of potential for RA. look at the numbers of an RA with road race turbo kit....its not even a huge turbo setup....just a user friendly day to day turbo kit running 7 psi of boost....it lays down more than an SRT-4 stock. Its an excellent alternative for an SRT-4 is all I am trying to say. plus the interior build quality is a step up from cheap mopar.....have you ever felt your interior?? the materials are softer to touch...hop in an SRT-4 and everything is solid hard and feels like it will make noise after 20,000 miles. lots of different opinions on this and thats fine...SRT-4 is a good bargain.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 12:43 AM
  #158  
can04rali's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: edmonton A.B. Canada
Originally Posted by TEXSRT4
i have to agree! everyone makes fun of the srt's interior saying it looks plasticy, however, i look at the lancer and see plasticy body pannels. i would rather have my car have a plastic interior than a cheap plasticy look to the body
at least we dont have a ridiculous looking wing stolen from a toyota product built in the 90's. Your car has way more plastic on it than RA LOL!!! I cant beleive you would even say that....plus you have false dual exhaust on a 4cyl???GAY!! On top of that your neons ride like 80 inchs off the ground stock......rediculous. oh...and it has a non functional hood scoop WTF??? Sorry bro, just helping correct your statement...LOL plasticy body?? LOL and at least mitsu offers pearl paint. Oh I can go on for hours.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 01:29 AM
  #159  
kericr's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
This whole thread makes baby Jesus cry.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 01:50 AM
  #160  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by can04rali
but there is alot of potential for RA. look at the numbers of an RA with road race turbo kit....its not even a huge turbo setup....just a user friendly day to day turbo kit running 7 psi of boost....it lays down more than an SRT-4 stock.
That is exactly what I was saying, I am the guy that posted about the turbo RA. I don't have one, and don't want one. I don't need a turbo to drive my car fast.

But if you turbo an RA and get a stock evo and a stock SRT4 (both more expensive) you are calling the RA a bad investment? How do you figure, and I haven't driven either other car so I am not going to make any claims about handling or actual power, that the numbers on the dyno make my 20K$ with turbo (maybe) RA a bad investment compared to your insurance hungry very expensive evo and a now slower more expensive at 21K$ (maybe) Neon?

I am not fighting for any of these three cars outright, because I have only driven one. But you definitely need to stop bashing my car man, because unless you have driven one or ridden with me you can't tell me I made a bad investment.

Your evo is faster, so is the neon, but the RA has more potential as far as engine than both of those cars. 7psi of boost and pump gas make my RA faster than the SRT4. thats impressive for a car with no factory support and very little aftermarket support no matter where you are from, canada, japan, and even evoland. which is exactly where ike and evo8rcr can go, back to evoland.

I happen to like Canada, by the way, so keep your opinions about there nationality/food/car choices out of ralliart general or any other ralliart forum for that matter. you can do that in evoland since they can't be included their anyway.

Damn European Cigarrettes always talking down to people on EvoM.

With all the bickering you would figure the mods would have interfeared with this thread already.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #161  
can04rali's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: edmonton A.B. Canada
thx Dan...vry well put.....keep eatin the SRT-4's
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #162  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Originally Posted by DangerousDan
With all the bickering you would figure the mods would have interfeared with this thread already.
Honestly, I thought this thread stayed pretty civil for what it was. However, I think everything that can be argued has been, so the thread has served its purpose.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SRT4 to Evox
Evo X General
9
Jan 11, 2011 11:14 PM
Blkhrt
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
76
Jul 10, 2006 04:52 PM
SRT~4
Evo Show / Shine
15
Nov 10, 2005 07:43 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50 PM.