SRT vs Lancer
Originally Posted by bigdoggy_dog
The average person on these forums doesn't spend all of his time around nothing but car enthusiasts either. So having to deal with the rest of society on a daily basis becomes a more prevelant issue. I know I'd get sick of trying to explain and defend my car all the time to people that don't know about sports cars. And hearing "It's just a neon" along with that would really annoy the hell out of me.
The SRT-4 may just be a neon in your eyes, but it's a fast and fun to drive Neon, I'll take that over just a Lancer any day.
i kno the dodge dealer around me is very mod friendly..for me i would def a get srt over the ralliart..cus its much quicker and u can make those things pretty damn fast for a pretty good price..and srt-4s sound bad ***
i have to agree! everyone makes fun of the srt's interior saying it looks plasticy, however, i look at the lancer and see plasticy body pannels. i would rather have my car have a plastic interior than a cheap plasticy look to the body
Originally Posted by Ike
Once again, reading comprehension > you. I insulted your bacon and your Mitsubishi lineup, and it was a joke, lighten up. The only people knocking rides in here are the Ralliart fanbois insulting the SRT-4.
Originally Posted by evo8rcr
now if this is true canada is the biggest bunch of f*cktards they are worse then cali. what is the source of your info?
Originally Posted by Ike
but I give respect where it's due, and the SRT-4 has damn impressive performance for the price, the Ralliart is just a good car that's peppy.
Originally Posted by TEXSRT4
i have to agree! everyone makes fun of the srt's interior saying it looks plasticy, however, i look at the lancer and see plasticy body pannels. i would rather have my car have a plastic interior than a cheap plasticy look to the body
Originally Posted by can04rali
but there is alot of potential for RA. look at the numbers of an RA with road race turbo kit....its not even a huge turbo setup....just a user friendly day to day turbo kit running 7 psi of boost....it lays down more than an SRT-4 stock.
But if you turbo an RA and get a stock evo and a stock SRT4 (both more expensive) you are calling the RA a bad investment? How do you figure, and I haven't driven either other car so I am not going to make any claims about handling or actual power, that the numbers on the dyno make my 20K$ with turbo (maybe) RA a bad investment compared to your insurance hungry very expensive evo and a now slower more expensive at 21K$ (maybe) Neon?
I am not fighting for any of these three cars outright, because I have only driven one. But you definitely need to stop bashing my car man, because unless you have driven one or ridden with me you can't tell me I made a bad investment.
Your evo is faster, so is the neon, but the RA has more potential as far as engine than both of those cars. 7psi of boost and pump gas make my RA faster than the SRT4. thats impressive for a car with no factory support and very little aftermarket support no matter where you are from, canada, japan, and even evoland. which is exactly where ike and evo8rcr can go, back to evoland.
I happen to like Canada, by the way, so keep your opinions about there nationality/food/car choices out of ralliart general or any other ralliart forum for that matter. you can do that in evoland since they can't be included their anyway.
Damn European Cigarrettes always talking down to people on EvoM.
With all the bickering you would figure the mods would have interfeared with this thread already.
Originally Posted by DangerousDan
With all the bickering you would figure the mods would have interfeared with this thread already.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post











