Thinking Of Selling
Originally Posted by KevinO
No, that argument has been beaten to death and doesn't make sense.
if a car is based off a turd. it might resemble one.
if a car is based off something that is fairly decent, most likely itll be a bit bettre than decent.
but hey, to each his own
Originally Posted by peterdaniel
Sorry, Chrylser has never ever been known for quality cars
I would stick with a Mistubishi over a chrysler product anyday
I agree with the others.. Buy a Evo.
and LeftysRule22 a lancer is not based off an evo, its based off a mirage, which as far as im concerned, is a POS.
how many people here have driven a SRT-4? i drove on at srt days with my buddy, along with the srt10 truck and an srt6 crossfire. its quick and handles really nicely on the track.
All cars are based upon the original horse and carrage buggy which is a POS, therefore all cars are POS!!!
If you want power get a v8 like a mustang or a camero. My old car was a lincoln mark vIII and it basically outhandled my lancer and had more power. I really do like the lancer RA though alot. My lincoln was not like race track fast but for the street, I did not often see cars that were faster, unless they weren't trying, but somehow I think they were. I remember one day getting on the highway and this evo floored by me and i followed them on the onramp and they weren't putting any distance between me and them and I thought, haha my 13 year old car with 160k miles is as fast as this brand new ricer.
So in conclusion, if power is what you want get a V8, unless you can afford the expensive cars. If you want a car that is reliable and fun to drive get the srt-4 or a lancer or really whatever floats your boat.
If you want power get a v8 like a mustang or a camero. My old car was a lincoln mark vIII and it basically outhandled my lancer and had more power. I really do like the lancer RA though alot. My lincoln was not like race track fast but for the street, I did not often see cars that were faster, unless they weren't trying, but somehow I think they were. I remember one day getting on the highway and this evo floored by me and i followed them on the onramp and they weren't putting any distance between me and them and I thought, haha my 13 year old car with 160k miles is as fast as this brand new ricer.
So in conclusion, if power is what you want get a V8, unless you can afford the expensive cars. If you want a car that is reliable and fun to drive get the srt-4 or a lancer or really whatever floats your boat.
Last edited by lundefinedl; Jul 28, 2006 at 01:46 PM.
Dude the ralliart can be faster than a srt-4. Ull sell the car for 15k and spend another 6k in gettin the srt-4. Why not jus turbo ur car and some light suspension work... u can damn well do great. Turbo Ra from RRM or the supercharger from RIPP, the ralliart is doin mid to high 13's easy with good tires.
The srt-4 is a great car but its styling is not my cup of tea. IN the amount of selling ur car and rebuying another car. Jus mod out the ralliart OR jus go get the Evo ( selling ur ralliart and saving up )
The srt-4 is a great car but its styling is not my cup of tea. IN the amount of selling ur car and rebuying another car. Jus mod out the ralliart OR jus go get the Evo ( selling ur ralliart and saving up )
Personally, if you want to upgrade, find yourself a lightly used WRX. I'm guessing a new Evo/STi is out of your price range, and personally, there are very few Evos out there that I'd be comfortable buying used (as in, I'd have to know the owner personally, and be able to track the car's history here on EvoM). I don't really see a point in going to an SRT-4. Really, I think you'd be better off slapping a turbo on the Ralliart.
Originally Posted by SocalES
and LeftysRule22 a lancer is not based off an evo, its based off a mirage, which as far as im concerned, is a POS.
i disagree with putting a turbo on the RA. you are going to have BAD tracion issues unless you spend another 900$ to get LSD. and i dont even think they have one yet?
i dont think you can beat the gurgle of that exhaust, i love that sound that srt's and wrx's make.
i dont think you can beat the gurgle of that exhaust, i love that sound that srt's and wrx's make.
Originally Posted by peterdaniel
That is simply ugly.
I would never buy a used hi performance car. Who the hell knows what stick it was beat with ( besides the ugly one)
Whats the warranty on the Neon?
I find them to be very small inside with the A pillar verrrrry close to my head
I don't think they do very well in a crash either ( heard that somewhere numerous times)
Sorry, Chrylser has never ever been known for quality cars
I would stick with a Mistubishi over a chrysler product anyday
I agree with the others.. Buy a Evo.
I would never buy a used hi performance car. Who the hell knows what stick it was beat with ( besides the ugly one)
Whats the warranty on the Neon?
I find them to be very small inside with the A pillar verrrrry close to my head
I don't think they do very well in a crash either ( heard that somewhere numerous times)
Sorry, Chrylser has never ever been known for quality cars
I would stick with a Mistubishi over a chrysler product anyday
I agree with the others.. Buy a Evo.
Originally Posted by KevinO
No, that argument has been beaten to death and doesn't make sense.
Originally Posted by SocalES
when you can go out and but an SRT-4 for 15k and put a bigger snail in that thing and be pulling 12's. if you know how to drive you shouldnt have any ridiculous traction problems.
Originally Posted by SocalES
and the whole "neon is a piece, lancer is not neither is the impreza"
yeah i call BS on that my ralliart has been in the shop 5 times in 4 months, and guess what, none of it is my fault and none is due to how i drive it. its getting all new valves, timing belt, idler gear, serpentine belt. all because the lancer IS in fact a piece.
yeah i call BS on that my ralliart has been in the shop 5 times in 4 months, and guess what, none of it is my fault and none is due to how i drive it. its getting all new valves, timing belt, idler gear, serpentine belt. all because the lancer IS in fact a piece.
Originally Posted by SocalES
how many people here have driven a SRT-4?
Originally Posted by SocalES
i disagree with putting a turbo on the RA. you are going to have BAD tracion issues unless you spend another 900$ to get LSD. and i dont even think they have one yet?
I like the styling of it
I like the handling of it
I drove it b4 and loved it
I talked to people who had a lancer and went to a srt 4 and never regret nothing, and no i do not care if its a neon
I like the handling of it
I drove it b4 and loved it
I talked to people who had a lancer and went to a srt 4 and never regret nothing, and no i do not care if its a neon
Originally Posted by SocalES
i disagree with putting a turbo on the RA. you are going to have BAD tracion issues unless you spend another 900$ to get LSD. and i dont even think they have one yet?
i dont think you can beat the gurgle of that exhaust, i love that sound that srt's and wrx's make.
i dont think you can beat the gurgle of that exhaust, i love that sound that srt's and wrx's make.
As for the exhaust sound, the Ralliart will sound very similar to an SRT-4. Turbo + test pipe makes that sound.
Originally Posted by MikeKondilis
My ralliart just dosen't feel like a sport car







