Beginners guide to modding, "what route should I take my 4g69" thread
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
I already did the bypass Crans, per my photos upthread and honestly don't have any intention of using spacers, but I was just trying to understand the "ifs" and "thens" to all of this. Thanks MIVEC for sharing your qualifications for it does let the forum know to whom they are speaking to and whether or not they can put their trust in what you're saying, unlike myself who's forte is NOT engineering, or internal combustion at that. Got any emergency medical questions? I MIGHT be able to answer a few of those...
j/k, sorry i saw your post, i was confused by the question...
#33
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already did the bypass Crans, per my photos upthread and honestly don't have any intention of using spacers, but I was just trying to understand the "ifs" and "thens" to all of this. Thanks MIVEC for sharing your qualifications for it does let the forum know to whom they are speaking to and whether or not they can put their trust in what you're saying, unlike myself who's forte is NOT engineering, or internal combustion at that. Got any emergency medical questions? I MIGHT be able to answer a few of those...
rofl...
#34
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
speaking of header, do these look like rrm ones? the guy claims they are but he seems iffy and i know kijiji can be sketchy, thanks in advance for any help http://ontario.kijiji.ca/c-ViewAdLar...AdId=366430111
RRM has a 4 to 1 design. The one in your link is a 4-2-1. Bolt pattern is also off and you have an extra bung there.
Edit: The fact that he says 02-06 also is pretty shady. Our Ralliarts only came out from 04-06.
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
2004-2006 Lancer Ralliart RRM Race Series Header/Downpipe
RRM has a 4 to 1 design. The one in your link is a 4-2-1. Bolt pattern is also off and you have an extra bung there.
Edit: The fact that he says 02-06 also is pretty shady. Our Ralliarts only came out from 04-06.
RRM has a 4 to 1 design. The one in your link is a 4-2-1. Bolt pattern is also off and you have an extra bung there.
Edit: The fact that he says 02-06 also is pretty shady. Our Ralliarts only came out from 04-06.
#37
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Delta BC
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.ws6.com/mod-8.htm
I'm new here and stumbled across this thread and did a quick search for any dyno results for the bypass and found this.. I'm not really for or against at this point but I found it interested none the less. If the hp increase is in fact true, I find it strange that he records that the throttle temperature is 80F on both dyno runs.
I'm new here and stumbled across this thread and did a quick search for any dyno results for the bypass and found this.. I'm not really for or against at this point but I found it interested none the less. If the hp increase is in fact true, I find it strange that he records that the throttle temperature is 80F on both dyno runs.
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
http://www.ws6.com/mod-8.htm
I'm new here and stumbled across this thread and did a quick search for any dyno results for the bypass and found this.. I'm not really for or against at this point but I found it interested none the less. If the hp increase is in fact true, I find it strange that he records that the throttle temperature is 80F on both dyno runs.
I'm new here and stumbled across this thread and did a quick search for any dyno results for the bypass and found this.. I'm not really for or against at this point but I found it interested none the less. If the hp increase is in fact true, I find it strange that he records that the throttle temperature is 80F on both dyno runs.
"Here, the dyno shows a 6.3 horsepower and 7.1 ft/lbs torque difference between having coolant run through the throttle body and bypassing it, with an average gain of 5.6 horsepower and 6.8 ft/lbs torque. I made the first test after driving the car for approximately 15 minutes. I monitored Coolant Temp and Intake Air Temp while making the run. At the beginning of the baseline run, the coolant was at 178F, intake air was at 80F, and the throttle body itself had a surface temperature of 102F. After bypassing, I again brought the car to temperature and repeated the test. This time, the coolant was at 180F, intake air was 80F and the throttle body was at 82F. To make sure the runs were accurate, I set the cruise on the dyno to 70mph in 6th and let the car run for about 6 minutes. After this time, the throttle body had reached 100F. I let the car cool to 185F coolant temp, and 88F intake air temp. Running the car again with these elevated heat readings yielded another .2 horsepower and -.2 ft/lbs torque compared to before heat soaking the engine. Check out the Dynojet Race Routine between the stock vehicle, the stock throttle body coolant routing and bypassing the throttle body coolant."
#39
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
The point of this TB bypass is to keep it from getting hot right? What is the point in it running coolant up there anyway? To keep it from freezing up? I thought about doing this when I first got my RA but I was unsure about it. I live in KY and in the summer I could get well above 100* but in the winter it could stay below 0 for days so I figured it would be better to just leave it alone. Am I wrong it thinking this? Would it be fine if I went ahead and bypassed it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PIE-R
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
6
Dec 21, 2019 08:14 PM
Andrew@AMS
Vendor Announcements
10
Mar 4, 2016 09:27 PM
Vivid Racing
EvoX 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
12
Jul 5, 2012 11:48 AM