2004 Ralliart or 2005 RSX Type-S

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 12, 2004 | 03:39 PM

#61

captain150

Evolved Member

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 929

Likes: 0

From: A

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karass

The more I drive my RA, the more I like it and the fact that theres so much space inside this car is incredible. thats why I kinda prefer it over cars like RSX and other small sporty vehicules. Also, its so inexpensive to insure cause its not considered a sport car (hehe suckers!). I pay 886$ for a full coverage and I have my girlfriend as a casual driver. Heck, my 99' honda Civic (hatchback, YERK!) was 980$ to insure and 1250$ 2 years ago. Im so much laughing now, I still cant believe how cheap it is now; god its a 2005

... my friends cant belive it either. I must say that I never had any crash or anything with my cars in 10 years of driving.

Feels good to be a RA owner these days...

SAME HERE. A guy I work with has a 2002 RSX that costs 1400 a year to insure. BRAND NEW my ralliart costed 1100 a year to insure. I also know what you mean, the car still goes and handles like the little sport coupes, why does it have to be a coupe

The RSX is also really hard to see out of, despite a country sized rear glass, it is very hard to see out of (the glass is at such an extreme angle). The doors are really high, the side windows are REALLY small.
Everyday I like the RA more and more, it's nicer to drive than the RSX, however you can throw it around in the corners and it takes it all. I did leave the sunroof open though, it rained a little but it could have been A LOT worse. Just thinking of a huge downpour makes me cringe.