Ralliart worth it? Has some SERIOUS competition
#31
No Chrysler Group Lifetime Powertrain warranty on SRT products.
#33
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm I would re think the chevy comment as they do have a good track record for over 30 years. Every car company has it's faults and Mitsubishi has issues poor track record also.
I'm just stating its poor judement on American cars. Yes some of the American cars sucks no doubt. They do make some kick butt muscle cars. Mustangs, Camaro. Legends and oh the Corvette. I'm going to stick up for my American pride. But the bottom line all companies have some crappy cars.
I'm just stating its poor judement on American cars. Yes some of the American cars sucks no doubt. They do make some kick butt muscle cars. Mustangs, Camaro. Legends and oh the Corvette. I'm going to stick up for my American pride. But the bottom line all companies have some crappy cars.
Mitsubishi definitely has had issues over the years, but most of the issues in North America are due to the dealer network being much newer, and often a lot more sparse than their competitors. They actually rate very high on reliability.
I didn't mean to say that Americans build terrible cars -- a lot of the Japanese and European models built in the US are excellent (and a lot of the 'American' cars built in Canada and Mexico are crappy) -- it's more a matter of how badly the big three US manufacturers have been run over the years. Maybe a better way to put it would be that the big US car companies design crappy cars.
#34
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most cars are fairly cheap to repair for their first five or six years, even with no warranty. As evidence, consider the tens of thousands of US cars that have been bought cross-border recently by Canadians who received no domestic warranty coverage, due to sleazy wording of US warranties (some apply in Canada, but many or most don't).
#36
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mitsu has one of the crappiest warranties for the majority of people on this thread (individuals looking to mod). However, Mitsu still allows their dealerships to make warranty decisions. I dread the day Mitsu's warranty (or anyone elses for that matter) becomes like BMW, and every thing that is done on your car is sent to the head office and they make all the decisions, Yikes!!
But if you're looking to do some major mods the used evo is probably a better choice. Personally however, I'd go with the RA.
But if you're looking to do some major mods the used evo is probably a better choice. Personally however, I'd go with the RA.
#37
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hate to say it, but those some of those cars that you listed won't be much competition for the new RalliArt. Sure the SRT-4, MS3, and new Cobalt SS have the power, but they are just FWD. Since I drive a MS3, I kind of know what I am talking about. The car is fun and powerful, but it lacks traction and is a handful at WOT. I WRX would be more of a competitor against the new RalliArt.
I could be wrong about what I said. I am sure one of the major car magazines will line these cars up against each other. It should be interesting to see which one is the quickest. I am betting on the RalliArt.
I could be wrong about what I said. I am sure one of the major car magazines will line these cars up against each other. It should be interesting to see which one is the quickest. I am betting on the RalliArt.
the car runs the 1/4 mile not even a sec slower than a Vette.
and on the track finished only 8 secs behind a vett.
as far as performance i think the SS would win this category followed by the RA,then the WRX and then the MS3
#39
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mitsu has one of the crappiest warranties for the majority of people on this thread (individuals looking to mod). However, Mitsu still allows their dealerships to make warranty decisions. I dread the day Mitsu's warranty (or anyone elses for that matter) becomes like BMW, and every thing that is done on your car is sent to the head office and they make all the decisions, Yikes!!
But if you're looking to do some major mods the used evo is probably a better choice. Personally however, I'd go with the RA.
But if you're looking to do some major mods the used evo is probably a better choice. Personally however, I'd go with the RA.
You cut the dealer out of the loop and then go crying when something breaks, then the size and maturity of the dealer enters directly into the equation -- Mitsubishi just doesn't have the market share for really high-volume dealers. For example, Mazda has three dealers in Calgary, while Mitsubishi has two, but the car sales volume must make your Mitsubishi dealers a lot smaller -- down in Lethbridge, as here in Fredericton, there is one dealer for each, so that the Mitsubishi dealers are far smaller (note to confused Americans and others: Mazda is a much more significant brand in Canada, especially compared to Mitsubishi, which has been selling cars here for less than a decade).
#40
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Low Profile, TX
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know the WRX is the target and it would be disappointing if the RA didn't match it and the SS. But without launch control on the SST and with a 300/400 weight penalty compared to the WRX/SS, it would be surprising if it does match the 0-60. Maybe it can catch up in the 1/4 with the faster shifts.
But 0-60 and 1/4 mile times aren't gonna be the right metrics for this car. Just like the MR (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...=4#performance with launch control/super-sport mode), it's not going a dragstrip king even in it's class. At least with the SST, It's gonna be more of a driver's car / occasional track car.
But 0-60 and 1/4 mile times aren't gonna be the right metrics for this car. Just like the MR (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...=4#performance with launch control/super-sport mode), it's not going a dragstrip king even in it's class. At least with the SST, It's gonna be more of a driver's car / occasional track car.
#41
Newbie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's too bad that the TS-SSC transmission in the Ralliart will only handle around 315hp before it shuts itself down. The CVT's in the 09 GTS are the same way. Self preservation technology to keep the transmission from blowing once the power reaches a certain level.
Sport Compact Car did an article on the new Ralliart, look there for the 315hp cutoff. Also, there -will- be a manual version released either in late '09 or in 2010.
RRM calls it 'limp/gimp' mode. They're looking for a way around it at the moment.
Sport Compact Car did an article on the new Ralliart, look there for the 315hp cutoff. Also, there -will- be a manual version released either in late '09 or in 2010.
RRM calls it 'limp/gimp' mode. They're looking for a way around it at the moment.
#42
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heck, I'd say we'll be lucky to see the TC-SST Ralliart in late 2009, though apparently they are gearing up for a Fall release (note that Fall ends officially on Dec. 22 or so).
#43
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So just bite the bullet and have the dealer install the mods -- sure it costs a bit extra, but what's the big issue if you care so much about the warranty? I had no problems at all getting my Mazda dealer to do a variety of mods, and since they did all of the work, there were absolutely no problems with warranty later on. Obviously a dealer will balk at installing mods that void the warranty, and only the sleaziest of dealers wouldn't tell you the warranty implications up front.
You cut the dealer out of the loop and then go crying when something breaks, then the size and maturity of the dealer enters directly into the equation -- Mitsubishi just doesn't have the market share for really high-volume dealers. For example, Mazda has three dealers in Calgary, while Mitsubishi has two, but the car sales volume must make your Mitsubishi dealers a lot smaller -- down in Lethbridge, as here in Fredericton, there is one dealer for each, so that the Mitsubishi dealers are far smaller (note to confused Americans and others: Mazda is a much more significant brand in Canada, especially compared to Mitsubishi, which has been selling cars here for less than a decade).
You cut the dealer out of the loop and then go crying when something breaks, then the size and maturity of the dealer enters directly into the equation -- Mitsubishi just doesn't have the market share for really high-volume dealers. For example, Mazda has three dealers in Calgary, while Mitsubishi has two, but the car sales volume must make your Mitsubishi dealers a lot smaller -- down in Lethbridge, as here in Fredericton, there is one dealer for each, so that the Mitsubishi dealers are far smaller (note to confused Americans and others: Mazda is a much more significant brand in Canada, especially compared to Mitsubishi, which has been selling cars here for less than a decade).
#44
Check out Consumer Reports -- one of the few unbiased sources -- most guides and magazines accept commercial sponsors left and right. Chevrolet models have had consistently crappy ratings for years -- sure, the Corvette is different, but that's a bit like saying all Toyotas are Lexuses (or, in performance terms, that all Mitsubishis are Evos).
Mitsubishi definitely has had issues over the years, but most of the issues in North America are due to the dealer network being much newer, and often a lot more sparse than their competitors. They actually rate very high on reliability.
I didn't mean to say that Americans build terrible cars -- a lot of the Japanese and European models built in the US are excellent (and a lot of the 'American' cars built in Canada and Mexico are crappy) -- it's more a matter of how badly the big three US manufacturers have been run over the years. Maybe a better way to put it would be that the big US car companies design crappy cars.
Mitsubishi definitely has had issues over the years, but most of the issues in North America are due to the dealer network being much newer, and often a lot more sparse than their competitors. They actually rate very high on reliability.
I didn't mean to say that Americans build terrible cars -- a lot of the Japanese and European models built in the US are excellent (and a lot of the 'American' cars built in Canada and Mexico are crappy) -- it's more a matter of how badly the big three US manufacturers have been run over the years. Maybe a better way to put it would be that the big US car companies design crappy cars.
#45
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never said I have had any warranty issues, but lots of individuals have had issues, and the dealers here say they will sell and install parts (such as a CAI), but won't warranty them. I am in a bit of a different situation then most people as I know the owner of the dealership on a personal level, outside the transaction of the cars. But most people will not have this priviledge.
I just meant to get the dealer to install parts (that you provide), to ensure that the warranty remains on the original car (i.e. all the parts you don't replace) -- obviously if you install, say, custom brakes, then the original warranty on the brakes flies out the window along with the original brakes.