Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Are these the numbers that I should be getting with what I have??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 10:40 AM
  #1  
2010 Rallihead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Are these the numbers that I should be getting with what I have??

With everything I have I'm only pushing 224Whp/273WTrq??!!
Is this all, I mean the price to power... doesn't seem fair

the exhaust should give me 10hp, the intercooler should be another 10hp and be more after tuned. and then theres the intake... I was expecting a 30-50hp increase all I got was 20hp increase, what BS...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:02 AM
  #2  
Westbound&down's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Up North
you have no exhuast components at all, which is clearly hurting your ability to make power. Torque is right.

You need a full turbo back . Do you have the charts, one that includes the boost levels?

the intake for reference gives you little to no increase.

I had a catback, intake, front mount, and piping and made 242whp and 276torque which was up from 194 whp and 224 torque stock before i did more stuff and the x swap.

Where was the tune done?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #3  
2muchboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: LOS Angeles CA
what dyno is this on?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #4  
RADriver's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
I would expect 5-7 WHP in a Full Turbo back
Intercooler would only keep the HP you are making with keeping cooling efficiency
UICP I would expect maybe a 5 WHP gain at most.
RA stock intake is very efficient so a CAI may not even be beneficial in HP gains
Take manufacturer hp claims with a grain of salt.

So if your RA was making 198 WHP (average from what I see on Dyno numbers posted here)

You are gaining at best 12 WHP putting you at 210 WHP without a tune and thats being very generous IMO.

HP is expensive.

Next is a tune who did it how competent are they and how aggressive is it. Who did your tune? What were your base numbers? A competent tuner would let you see the gains they achieved.

I think from what you are posting that yes you should see more especially from the tune department. But do not expect miracles in the bolt ons.

Last edited by RADriver; Jan 11, 2011 at 11:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #5  
Westbound&down's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Up North
Originally Posted by 2muchboost
what dyno is this on?
the same dyno he baseline 194 whp on.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #6  
TOralliart's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, CA
If his baseline was 194, that is a 30WHP gain which seems pretty good with that list of mods.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:27 AM
  #7  
2010 Rallihead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
on a Mustang Dyno my stock numbers were 193 whp / 215 wtq
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #8  
2muchboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: LOS Angeles CA
I dont want to play the dyno game but those are good number considering its a mustang dyno.
I think you could gain another 6-10whp with a down pipe and better flowing catback....
You gained 60lbs of TQ to the wheels, thats gotta feel good!

How does your boost plot look?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
RADriver's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
I am estimating (read guessing) that my cost per HP ratio is around $55.00 CND and I figured I went fairly cheap.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
2010 Rallihead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
The plot graph looks good, and its set too 22 PSI
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
2muchboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: LOS Angeles CA
I'm guessing thats a spike @ 22psi.
how much boost are you holding to red line?

You should post up your before and after dyno sheet
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 12:08 PM
  #12  
2010 Rallihead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
heres the sheet

Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 12:13 PM
  #13  
b16a2delsol's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: killa streets of slc
Don't feel bad my evo ix only made 245/277 (mustange 4280 ft elav) lol.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #14  
TOralliart's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, CA
I think you would feel better if you had the baseline to compare to. I think your numbers are right around where they should be at.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 02:38 PM
  #15  
2010 Rallihead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by TOralliart
I think you would feel better if you had the baseline to compare to. I think your numbers are right around where they should be at.
Like I said my stock numbers were 193 whp / 215 wtq
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 AM.