Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 08:20 PM
  #1  
bafhoops89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: south florida
Mpg

What are most people getting for there MPGS ?????? with and without mods???
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #2  
EBL08's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Huachuca, AZ
I'm pretty sure there is a thread on this already or was a thread. But to amuse the topic, I was getting about 210 till I had to fill up again. I added an UICP, High flow filter and JDM BPV and now I get between 270 and 280 till I have to fill up again.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
yip's Avatar
yip
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 326
Likes: 35
From: SoCal
In sport mode with mixed city and highway I get 14-16. Mostly highway with a little city in normal I average 19-21. All Highway the best I have seen is 23. Completely stock!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 06:27 AM
  #4  
Veronica's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 33
From: Chesapeake Beach, MD
27 MPG usually.
Combined city/hwy with the occasional 'catapult launch' to smoke some errant Civic Si or G35 sedan
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 06:40 AM
  #5  
IllFactor's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: charlevoix michigan
2003 Evo 8 MPG

edit, sorry wrong car

25mpg though

Last edited by IllFactor; Aug 23, 2011 at 06:43 AM. Reason: wrong car
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 07:25 AM
  #6  
jkennedy293's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: Eastern NC
I get about 24-25mpg with the 93 oct boost-pill tune.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #7  
tjwphoto's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Framingham, MA
18mpg STOCK! mine needs help
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #8  
highlyevolved's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
I'm surprised to see these numbers. I was debating between the Evo X and RA solely based on highway mileage. If I'm light footed on my mostly highway commute my Evo X can get up to 25 mpg door to door. Doesn't sound like a huge step down from the RA mileage.

I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 11:06 PM
  #9  
richardjh's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
In Ralliart (tune started from GST Boost Pill base map, but rather different now!). Edit: Fuel is 92-93oct (98 RON in Aus).

This morning on my run to drop kiddies at school (suburbs+freeway), the reading was 10.5 litres/100km - which is apparently 22.4mpg. After that, I had a snarl-free freeway drive into the city, and it read 9.5 l/100km - 24.8mpg.

Note: That's off the random-number-generator trip computer. I can't rely on tank-to-tank readings - those tune-tweaking evening drives tend to skew the numbers somewhat! :P

Rich
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
robbo185's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
stock ralliart easy driving i get about 21-23 mpg and that is mostly city
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 08:26 PM
  #11  
xi's Avatar
xi
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 4
From: NYC
The last trip I took, the last like, 900 mile leg averaged 27.6mpg for the whole trip.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #12  
Amrush2782's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: New York
stock, 24mg, 93 octane
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #13  
mlambert890's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: United States
GST 2.5, stock pill... 27-28 highway... closer to about 19-20 city

A thread like this is almost pointless honestly b/c it is completely dependent on driving style.

I dont think there will be a huge difference between an Evo X MR and an RA really b/c the horsepower difference isnt gigantic and its essentially the same transmission.

Reason I chose the RA was for the softer ride, larger trunk and fold down seats. I dont think mileage is a giant difference.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by highlyevolved
I'm surprised to see these numbers. I was debating between the Evo X and RA solely based on highway mileage. If I'm light footed on my mostly highway commute my Evo X can get up to 25 mpg door to door. Doesn't sound like a huge step down from the RA mileage.

I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
Why would the RA have better mileage? If anything it will get worse because the stock turbo spools if you sneeze on the hwy.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 11:13 PM
  #15  
highlyevolved's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
I'm not sure actually, I figured it was detuned with one goal to increase mileage ratings. I guess it's the same story between the Evo and RA - stay out of boost and you'll get similar numbers.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.