Mpg
Aug 22, 2011, 08:44 PM
#2
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ft. Huachuca, AZ
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pretty sure there is a thread on this already or was a thread. But to amuse the topic, I was getting about 210 till I had to fill up again. I added an UICP, High flow filter and JDM BPV and now I get between 270 and 280 till I have to fill up again.
Trending Topics
Aug 23, 2011, 10:38 PM
#8
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: phoenix
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised to see these numbers. I was debating between the Evo X and RA solely based on highway mileage. If I'm light footed on my mostly highway commute my Evo X can get up to 25 mpg door to door. Doesn't sound like a huge step down from the RA mileage.
I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
Aug 23, 2011, 11:06 PM
#9
Evolved Member
In Ralliart (tune started from GST Boost Pill base map, but rather different now!). Edit: Fuel is 92-93oct (98 RON in Aus).
This morning on my run to drop kiddies at school (suburbs+freeway), the reading was 10.5 litres/100km - which is apparently 22.4mpg. After that, I had a snarl-free freeway drive into the city, and it read 9.5 l/100km - 24.8mpg.
Note: That's off the random-number-generator trip computer. I can't rely on tank-to-tank readings - those tune-tweaking evening drives tend to skew the numbers somewhat! :P
Rich
This morning on my run to drop kiddies at school (suburbs+freeway), the reading was 10.5 litres/100km - which is apparently 22.4mpg. After that, I had a snarl-free freeway drive into the city, and it read 9.5 l/100km - 24.8mpg.
Note: That's off the random-number-generator trip computer. I can't rely on tank-to-tank readings - those tune-tweaking evening drives tend to skew the numbers somewhat! :P
Rich
Aug 24, 2011, 08:57 PM
#13
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GST 2.5, stock pill... 27-28 highway... closer to about 19-20 city
A thread like this is almost pointless honestly b/c it is completely dependent on driving style.
I dont think there will be a huge difference between an Evo X MR and an RA really b/c the horsepower difference isnt gigantic and its essentially the same transmission.
Reason I chose the RA was for the softer ride, larger trunk and fold down seats. I dont think mileage is a giant difference.
A thread like this is almost pointless honestly b/c it is completely dependent on driving style.
I dont think there will be a huge difference between an Evo X MR and an RA really b/c the horsepower difference isnt gigantic and its essentially the same transmission.
Reason I chose the RA was for the softer ride, larger trunk and fold down seats. I dont think mileage is a giant difference.
Aug 24, 2011, 10:20 PM
#14
I'm surprised to see these numbers. I was debating between the Evo X and RA solely based on highway mileage. If I'm light footed on my mostly highway commute my Evo X can get up to 25 mpg door to door. Doesn't sound like a huge step down from the RA mileage.
I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
I was somewhat expecting people to be cracking 30mpgs with the RA.
Aug 24, 2011, 11:13 PM
#15
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: phoenix
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure actually, I figured it was detuned with one goal to increase mileage ratings. I guess it's the same story between the Evo and RA - stay out of boost and you'll get similar numbers.