2009 Lancer Ralliart - GST Basemap
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Guys,
These ROMs have been cleared for WOT testing:
2009-2011 USDM
If you can do the WOT testing as outlined in the PDF that was sent to you, that would be great!
These ROMs have been cleared for WOT testing:
2009-2011 USDM
If you can do the WOT testing as outlined in the PDF that was sent to you, that would be great!
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
G-Ralliart, it does seem your EvoScan is having dropout issues. Like, in log 1 it skips 2 seconds (lines 17-18). In log 4 it skips over 3 seconds (lines 31-32).
Check to see if you've got audible alarms for anything. I know on my EvoScan, any triggered alarm sound has a nasty habit of distracting the program from logging whatever it's "alarmed" about.
Alternatively, it could just be the laptop itself, getting busy for a second in the background (downloading ****, playing CoD, etc......... hehe).
Despite that weird EvoScan issue, you've got some quality data captured there! Nice logs...
Rich
Check to see if you've got audible alarms for anything. I know on my EvoScan, any triggered alarm sound has a nasty habit of distracting the program from logging whatever it's "alarmed" about.
Alternatively, it could just be the laptop itself, getting busy for a second in the background (downloading ****, playing CoD, etc......... hehe).
Despite that weird EvoScan issue, you've got some quality data captured there! Nice logs...
Rich
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: San diego
Thanks Rich. I hadn't noticed that, I will check it out. I don't have any alarms set in evoscan so I will see if there is anything running in the background. This laptop is brand new, bought specifically for logging, so I don't have any extra programs on here. I will make sure my wifi, bluetooth, windows updater etc are off while logging.
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
Here's a chunk of 'em...
I'm usually only really interested in the SlipSpeed ones... and the temp (when thrashing it at the track).
Rich
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="SST Transmission Temp" LogReference="SST_TM_Temp" RequestID="CAN28-0" Eval="x-50" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-50" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="1000" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="1000" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Odd Clutch Temp" LogReference="OddClutchTemp" RequestID="CAN33-0" Eval="x/4" Unit="C" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Even Clutch Temp" LogReference="EvenClutchTemp" RequestID="CAN33-2" Eval="x/4" Unit="C" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Odd Clutch Pressure" LogReference="OddClutchPressure" RequestID="CAN35-0" Eval="x*2" Signed="true" Unit="mbar" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Even Clutch Pressure" LogReference="EvenClutchPressure" RequestID="CAN35-2" Eval="x*2" Signed="true" Unit="mbar" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Odd Clutch SlipSpeed" LogReference="OddClutchSlipSpeed" RequestID="CAN34-0" Eval="x/2" Signed="true" Unit="rpm" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Even Clutch SlipSpeed" LogReference="EvenClutchSlipSpeed" RequestID="CAN34-2" Eval="x/2" Signed="true" Unit="rpm" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Odd Input Shaft Speed" LogReference="OddInputShaftSpeed" RequestID="CAN36-0" Eval="x" Unit="rpm" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Even Input Shaft Speed" LogReference="EvenInputShaftSpeed" RequestID="CAN36-2" Eval="x" Unit="rpm" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Rich
I thought I read a post in one of the threads where Bryan said he finally addressed that issue on his own tune. I'm planning to go back to the GST base map; I prefer the power delivery of the GST maps vs Cobb's Accessport maps. If anyone can chime in whether they have "rev hang" on 75%+ throttle applications with the new beta map, I would appreciate it.
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
Yes, some feedback on driveability would be most welcome - and it's not off-topic at all, BravoZero.
plastus.. The SST side of things has evolved from both v2.5 and v2.6. From my test-driving of v27, it's proving to be well behaved on the driveability front. No problematic downshift rev-matching, and no upshift rev-hang.
If course, if you switch to manual, go WOT in 1st gear and wait until 7100rpm before selecting 2nd, you'll whack the rev limiter. But that's not rev-hang - that's bad driving!
I'm definitely guilty on that score, and have plenty of logs recording my sins committed... but it was ALL IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE! 
Rich
plastus.. The SST side of things has evolved from both v2.5 and v2.6. From my test-driving of v27, it's proving to be well behaved on the driveability front. No problematic downshift rev-matching, and no upshift rev-hang.
If course, if you switch to manual, go WOT in 1st gear and wait until 7100rpm before selecting 2nd, you'll whack the rev limiter. But that's not rev-hang - that's bad driving!
I'm definitely guilty on that score, and have plenty of logs recording my sins committed... but it was ALL IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE! Rich
Evolved Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 3
From: Baltimore, MD
Of course, if you switch to manual, go WOT in 1st gear and wait until 7100rpm before selecting 2nd, you'll whack the rev limiter. But that's not rev-hang - that's bad driving! I'm definitely guilty on that score, and have plenty of logs recording my sins committed... but it was ALL IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE!
Rich
I'm definitely guilty on that score, and have plenty of logs recording my sins committed... but it was ALL IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE! Rich
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
Yeah, I'm only Mr. Perfect on the internet. 
I'm also a nubile 16yo untamed Nordic beauty named Candy. But that's on another forum.......
This is now a bit
<ahem>, back to those base maps!
xxx
Candy
I'm also a nubile 16yo untamed Nordic beauty named Candy. But that's on another forum.......
This is now a bit
<ahem>, back to those base maps!
xxx
Candy