Notices
ECU Flash

Higher than 319 boost limit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
turboracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Lake Arrowhead CA
Higher than 319 boost limit

I would like to use higher than 319 in my boost limit table. How hard would it be to come up with a patch or add to an already popular patch? (hint: the popular one has a 5 in it's name). I do not write code so please explain this to me in layman's terms.

Thanks
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #2  
bnice01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Hurlburt Field, FL
set it to 319 thru out the whole rpm (thats the max it will go up to). Then set your Timer to 50000, that will basically disable it.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #3  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I have a solution, you will be able to double your max loads, I will post up for 88590015 when I get to work!
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #4  
bnice01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Hurlburt Field, FL
I love it when you talk dirty like that tephra LOL
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #5  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
ok for 88590015 add
Code:
<table name="Boost Limit Dbl" category="Turbo" address="15cc4" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>
Now change the "Boost Limit Dbl" table from 0x6DDD to 0x4D00.

Also change your "LoadBoost" scaling from
Code:
<scaling name="LoadBoost" units="%" toexpr="x*5/4" frexpr="x*4/5" format="%.0f" min="0" max="319" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
to
Code:
<scaling name="LoadBoost" units="%" toexpr="x*10/4" frexpr="x*4/10" format="%.0f" min="0" max="638" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
Note the toexpr, frexpr and max changes.

Let me know how/if that works.

Cheers
D.

Last edited by tephra; May 28, 2008 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Just to be sure everyone understands the ABOVE mod is UNTESTED!

I guess do the mod and set your boost limit load to something like 120 and then do a low speed/low load logg to make sure you hit the limit like normal...
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I cant set it higher than 102 for some reason? Do I need to enter it as a hex value or something now?
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #8  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
scalings are around the wrong way...

max should be 319*2 ie 638
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
maybe its cause I use 1.30
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #10  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
my bad scaling should be:

Code:
<scaling name="LoadBoost" units="%" toexpr="x*10/4" frexpr="x*4/10" format="%.0f" min="0" max="319" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
obviously for 1.30 and below it needs to be endian=little
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #11  
alan678's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
any new word on this?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #12  
cossie1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
From: UK
same code for 90550001 ??
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #13  
BarryC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
HMMM could this be used to reduce the maximum timing retard limit???
at addresses 173f for 90550001 and 133f for rom 88570008
at the moment when its set to 255 the max limit is -10
could this get us down to -20 ???

ANTILAG
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #14  
cossie1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
From: UK
Barry I think I fixed your table last night
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
richardjh
ECU Flash
202
Nov 6, 2024 04:41 AM
richardjh
ECU Flash
25
Jul 28, 2017 03:49 PM
EVO2003VIII
ECU Flash
1
Feb 27, 2016 08:23 AM
butte
ECU Flash
4
Nov 12, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 PM.