344AWHP on stock turbo
Originally Posted by bs
Here is the graph of boost and air/fuel. The boost spikes to 23 and tapers to 20 at redline......it just wouldn't hold anything more to redline. The air/fuel is a nice 12:1 with the race fuel.
So what AFR did you run with 91 octane? And how much ignition timing are you running at full boost?
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
A gentlemen named Tony Szirka from umstuning helped tune the car and Richard from dynocomp assisted as well. For reference I dyno'd 216whp stock at dynocomp so I gained ~125whp with my mods. I'm not sure how dynocomps dyno compares to dyno4mance, but it definitely reads a little high relative to vishnu. The air fuel on the 91 octane map is right at 11:1.
Originally Posted by mdzuricky77
It was tuned by Doug himself who is no longer a part of Boost Solutions. He dynoed it in by himself. A spade is a spade so let's give the credit to tuner himself, Doug AKA Badazzcr. Congrats on your numbers. 344awhp on a Dyno Dynamics is bad ****. 
Matt
Matt
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
IDC on the pump gas tune is showing 85% @ 7000rpm and around 88% @ 7300rpm. 
I haven't had a chance to log the race gas map, but I suspect the IDC's are similar because I'm running only marginally more boost at redline and have it leaned out to 12:1.
I haven't had a chance to log the race gas map, but I suspect the IDC's are similar because I'm running only marginally more boost at redline and have it leaned out to 12:1.
As per my calculations, bs' car would give ~322whp on 109 oct and ~285whp on 91 oct on Dyno4mance's dyno.
FWIW, the 392whp numbers quoted on pg. 1 by MSanad are incomparable because Boost Solutions uses a Dynojet, which gives much higher numbers (common knowledge).
FWIW, the 392whp numbers quoted on pg. 1 by MSanad are incomparable because Boost Solutions uses a Dynojet, which gives much higher numbers (common knowledge).
Originally Posted by Ted B
As per my calculations, bs' car would give ~322whp on 109 oct and ~285whp on 91 oct on Dyno4mance's dyno.
FWIW, the 392whp numbers quoted on pg. 1 by MSanad are incomparable because Boost Solutions uses a Dynojet, which gives much higher numbers (common knowledge).
FWIW, the 392whp numbers quoted on pg. 1 by MSanad are incomparable because Boost Solutions uses a Dynojet, which gives much higher numbers (common knowledge).
Hey Ted,
Actually if you read what i wrote, you'll notice that i never really said that it was dynoed AT BOOST SOLUTIONS
. FWIW It was dynoed in houston i believe. nice try!
Ahem, dyno numbers between different type dynos vary WIDELY, and are largely incomparable except through statistical comparisons. My car may very well show 392whp on some dynos, but that is meaningless where comparing Dyno Dynamics numbers are concerned.
Originally Posted by Ted B
Ahem, dyno numbers between different type dynos vary WIDELY, and are largely incomparable except through statistical comparisons. My car may very well show 392whp on some dynos, but that is meaningless where comparing Dyno Dynamics numbers are concerned.
On a Dyno Dynamics, you can actually input the CORRECTION FACTOR manually, like 17%, 20%, 30%, etc... I remeber my dyno sheet was 502whp, and corrected by 17% was 586 or something like that. I wish we can do these adjustments on the dynojet... But I guess they wanted the tuners to stay away from playing with dyno numbers...
George
True, and such shortfalls must constantly be taken into account and point out to those who aren't yet aware.
One basically has to learn rough equivalents of both DJ and DD numbers to make sense out of these discussions, and that is assuming to some degree that the different DD operators are using the same correction factors.
One basically has to learn rough equivalents of both DJ and DD numbers to make sense out of these discussions, and that is assuming to some degree that the different DD operators are using the same correction factors.