Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

4" Intake vs. 3" Intake Testing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 10:26 AM
  #1  
Creamo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
4" Intake vs. 3" Intake Testing

Has AMS tested the power difference between running a 4" intake vs. a 3" intake on a 35R turbo or larger setup? On my setup I'll still be utilizing the stock MAF sensor, but I'm wondering if there is more power to be had by using a 4" intake pipe w/ a reducer at the sensor. Any insight is appreciated
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #2  
homemade wrx's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC
if you are still necking the inlet back to a 3" pipe for sensor, any gains will be negligable. The only gains you would have would be slightly decrease pipe flow losses from using a larger 4" pipe for a short section.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
I was considering this if I went the 35R route but decided it would take quite a bit of tuning to get everything back in line. It wouldn't just be WOT operation either, all the lower load cruise maps would have to be dialed in with lots of datalogging and likely at a different percentage at idle, cruise, and full boost. The only reason I could see this helping significantly is if you want to drop down to a lower part of the load maps due to outflowing what the stock ECU can manage. You may be able to find someone that has dynoed a larger turbo with a 3" intake versus a 4" intake with no other changes.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #4  
Creamo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Hiboost
I was considering this if I went the 35R route but decided it would take quite a bit of tuning to get everything back in line. It wouldn't just be WOT operation either, all the lower load cruise maps would have to be dialed in with lots of datalogging and likely at a different percentage at idle, cruise, and full boost. The only reason I could see this helping significantly is if you want to drop down to a lower part of the load maps due to outflowing what the stock ECU can manage. You may be able to find someone that has dynoed a larger turbo with a 3" intake versus a 4" intake with no other changes.
The reason I brought this up is that it was mentioned in a dyno tuning/results thread that great gains were to be had by going to a 4" pipe over 3". I agree that the whole map would have to re-tuned as well as rescaling the maf sensor. I was told AMS has tested this out, but I'm guessing it was probably on a speed density setup if they did.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #5  
1NastyMR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
You would have a gain if you ran 4" without MAF I believe
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:50 AM
  #6  
Pure Playaer's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Florida
if you are using stock maf you cannot use a 4inch intake since the maf is 3 inch.. correct me if im wrong
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:53 AM
  #7  
Kevin@MellonRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Sure you could with a 4" to 3" reducer
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
Creamo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Pure Playaer
if you are using stock maf you cannot use a 4inch intake since the maf is 3 inch.. correct me if im wrong
You can use a 4" to 3" silicone reducer for a full 4" intake pipe or one of these intake pipes that eliminates the silicone reducer:

Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #9  
97EclipseGSX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, IN
turbohoses.com They sell a 4" to 3 1/4" reducer. The maf is 3 1/4" not 3"
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #10  
1NastyMR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Just buy a standalone and do 4" intake the right way.....
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #11  
Creamo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by 1NastyMR
Just buy a standalone and do 4" intake the right way.....
Care to elaborate any further? Why would that be considered the "right" way?
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #12  
fugiwara's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (124)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia, CA
Originally Posted by Creamo3
Care to elaborate any further? Why would that be considered the "right" way?
so you don't have neck it down
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
Creamo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by fugiwara
so you don't have neck it down
I understand that; his comment adds nothing to my original question though. If I want to convert to speed density I'm still able to on stock ecu; I'm not going to spend $1500 just to remove the MAF sensor.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #14  
sekula's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by Creamo3
I understand that; his comment adds nothing to my original question though. If I want to convert to speed density I'm still able to on stock ecu; I'm not going to spend $1500 just to remove the MAF sensor.
Just use a 4" to 3" reducer at the turbo inlet and use a 3" intake pipe.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 10:43 PM
  #15  
1NastyMR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
You pretty much need to run Speed Density. Removing the maf thats how you'll get a gain..... MAF makes a restriction, SO clearly a 4" intake on a 4" = 100% performance doing a 3" on a 4" is 75% AKA restriction.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JDMV8
Evo X General
15
Jan 5, 2016 01:22 PM
LGshow19
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
41
Feb 22, 2011 02:29 PM
Mark@AMS
Automotosports - Illinois
49
Aug 31, 2010 07:42 AM
twinturbogreg
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Aug 9, 2010 03:22 PM
Done
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
10
Oct 23, 2009 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 AM.