Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

My EVO IX 1/4 TIMES

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #31  
alby988's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 8
From: usa
Originally Posted by gst95dsm
Its bone stock so no more than 5000 rpm.

Thats awesome though. I remember how hard I tried to get my 16g DSM to run a 12... and now my nine "may" do it stock...


i heard that bone stock, evo 9's dont have a rev limiter
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #32  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by alby988
i heard that bone stock, evo 9's dont have a rev limiter
All Evo's have rev limiter; that makes no sense. IXs also have a 5k launch limiter in addition to the regular 7600rpm rev limiter.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #33  
MR. SNOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Next 2 NYC
Talon now you finally see the light. Wow it takes two of us to post 12s before people see that the IX is serioius! By the way congrats!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 06:25 PM
  #34  
MR. SNOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Next 2 NYC
Question what is your Mileage? I ran my stock IX MR at a 12.97 at about 1200 miles.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 06:45 AM
  #35  
hova00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: WILMINGTON
i had 920 on the car when i went to the track.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 07:29 AM
  #36  
Turbo13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 729
Likes: 2
From: Arlington Heights IL
Congrats, I can't wait to see some IX's with bolt on's try and crack 11's!!!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #37  
EVOfunk's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: Bavaria, Germany
amazing
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #38  
Happy Madison's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by MR. SNOW
Question what is your Mileage? I ran my stock IX MR at a 12.97 at about 1200 miles.
snow, what was your mph on that 12.97? i keep hearing the IX MR's are a little slower than the base IX's. good to see that may not be true.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #39  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Happy Madison
snow, what was your mph on that 12.97? i keep hearing the IX MR's are a little slower than the base IX's. good to see that may not be true.
So I went to E.TOWN on a Stock 06 IX MR

His MPH was a bit lower, but he got the same ET thanks to a 1.82 60'.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #40  
shivaswrath's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, CT
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Yep. I see:

03-04 VIII at 200whp
05 VII at 210-215whp
06 IX at 230-235whp

-shiv
I must have a wicked stock '05, I just dynoed yesterday with an Works Air Filter and an axle back muffler (pretty stock imo), and put down 238awhp/235atq. . .woot woot, I'm rolling with the '06!!!!

Nice run on the 12's. . .
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #41  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by shivaswrath
I must have a wicked stock '05, I just dynoed yesterday with an Works Air Filter and an axle back muffler (pretty stock imo), and put down 238awhp/235atq. . .woot woot, I'm rolling with the '06!!!!

Nice run on the 12's. . .
Different dynos. Cars like yours would probably see around 220-225whp on our dyno. Just a guess though....

shiv
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #42  
hova00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: WILMINGTON
What do you guys think of my run? Good, Average, and hopefully not poor. Where can i improve? Obviously my 60' times can improve. What would be a fair assumption if my 60' was say a 1.75 or maybe high 1.6's. I would think possibly mid-12's.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #43  
MR. SNOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Next 2 NYC
Originally Posted by Happy Madison
snow, what was your mph on that 12.97? i keep hearing the IX MR's are a little slower than the base IX's. good to see that may not be true.
Yup, my mph was slower 104.35 but for my 12.98 it was 105.78. Car was a little better because it was warmed up some.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #44  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by hova00
What do you guys think of my run? Good, Average, and hopefully not poor. Where can i improve? Obviously my 60' times can improve. What would be a fair assumption if my 60' was say a 1.75 or maybe high 1.6's. I would think possibly mid-12's.
Average driving for that MPH, but above average compared to the rest of the Evo world when running stock. With a low 1.7, you're capable of a low 12.8 or high 12.7. With a high 1.6x, you're capable of a solid 12.7.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #45  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by MR. SNOW
Yup, my mph was slower 104.35 but for my 12.98 it was 105.78. Car was a little better because it was warmed up some.
Your hypothesis is not correct IMO. Usually lower 60fts result in slightly lower trapspeeds; especially if it is do to excessive spinning.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 AM.