My new times for my evo 9
Mar 3, 2006, 02:25 PM
#151
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arithmetic
TT is this true, are you guys doing this?
Lots of haters in this thread. Whats soo hard to believe .. the kid can drive .. he posted the slips. Hes going back to video ..so after that maybe people wont *****. His rev limter off the top of my head i dont remember.
The numbers are what they are .. he ran the time...
Mark
Turbotrix
Mar 3, 2006, 03:44 PM
#153
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im just curious why people don't believe that the stock valvetrain can't handle 8K rpm? The Evo spring/retainer setup is much better than the spring/retainer setup that was on the old 4g63. That setup handled 8k rpm without a problem. So why would the Evo be any different? PLENTY of people have been reving there stock heads to 8krpm without issues. Granted the stock turbo is not going to make power to 8k rpm but it will handle it. I will be raising the limiter on my Evo IX to over 8K rpm and have no probelm with having it bang off the limiter on a hard launch, etc.
Keith
Keith
Mar 3, 2006, 04:12 PM
#154
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not so much about shifting @8k, it's the power loss when shifting at that RPM. I agree with warrtalon, this just isn't adding up. I think there is more to the story 
Mar 3, 2006, 06:06 PM
#156
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^ No hate, but Gtech's are never accurate, even if cal. and setup perfectly... there nice eye candy thou for the mind.
Well, fill me in. What does the reflash put the new rev limiter and does this reflash make power after 8,000rpms?
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Lots of haters in this thread. Whats soo hard to believe .. the kid can drive .. he posted the slips. Hes going back to video ..so after that maybe people wont *****. His rev limter off the top of my head i dont remember.
The numbers are what they are .. he ran the time...
Mark
Turbotrix
The numbers are what they are .. he ran the time...
Mark
Turbotrix
Mar 3, 2006, 07:54 PM
#157
Originally Posted by Arithmetic
^^^ No hate, but Gtech's are never accurate, even if cal. and setup perfectly... there nice eye candy thou for the mind.
Well, fill me in. What does the reflash put the new rev limiter and does this reflash make power after 8,000rpms?
Well, fill me in. What does the reflash put the new rev limiter and does this reflash make power after 8,000rpms?
Dynoed 232HP/233TQ @ FFT with a temp of 71 (semi stock- panel filter & JDM MR DV)
Dynoed 234HP/237TQ w/ Gtech, temp between 40-50, same setup
Also Shiv says a IX stock on his DD dynos 230-235 HP & TQ. (Shivs & FFT dynoes are pretty inline with one another)
My GTECH dyno for my IX stock........233HP/233TQ, backed up with a 230HP/232TQ
Also, all my 1/4 times and traps are what they should be.
Mar 3, 2006, 08:02 PM
#158
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Lots of haters in this thread. Whats soo hard to believe .. the kid can drive .. he posted the slips. Hes going back to video ..so after that maybe people wont *****. His rev limter off the top of my head i dont remember.
The numbers are what they are .. he ran the time...
Mark
Turbotrix
The numbers are what they are .. he ran the time...
Mark
Turbotrix
I wouldn't worry much about what people say. I personally believe it(I haven't seen it thought) but I wouldn't be surprise that an Evo 9 could run those times.
You have tuned some fast cars and that is one of the reasons why I believe it.
Carlos
Mar 3, 2006, 08:05 PM
#159
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Im just curious why people don't believe that the stock valvetrain can't handle 8K rpm? The Evo spring/retainer setup is much better than the spring/retainer setup that was on the old 4g63. That setup handled 8k rpm without a problem. So why would the Evo be any different? PLENTY of people have been reving there stock heads to 8krpm without issues. Granted the stock turbo is not going to make power to 8k rpm but it will handle it. I will be raising the limiter on my Evo IX to over 8K rpm and have no probelm with having it bang off the limiter on a hard launch, etc.
Keith
Keith
I have absolutely no issues of any kind. Once in a while a have the typical well known clicking sound of the valves ticking for a few seconds but that is actually ramdonly and is not related to my head studs at all.
Carlos
Mar 4, 2006, 12:54 AM
#160
Most Wanted ran a 12.0@113mph while bouncing off the stock revlimiter (7600rpms) in 4th gear in his IX...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...0&postcount=75
So the real question is can you gain 3mph with 400/500rpms more????
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...0&postcount=75
So the real question is can you gain 3mph with 400/500rpms more????
Mar 4, 2006, 07:54 AM
#161
Evolving Member
116mph is suspiciously high. This thread smells a bit foul. As for snow tyres yes - taller tyres = more mph but also slower acceleration. There is no free ride when it comes to physics.
And ~Evilevo~ for the record you're an idiot.
And ~Evilevo~ for the record you're an idiot.
Last edited by boomtown; Mar 4, 2006 at 07:58 AM.
Mar 4, 2006, 08:24 AM
#162
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South Daytona, FL
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont see y he would be lieing, when he posted the time slip, and he s backed up by TT, none of them have any reason to lie. I think there are a lot of haters here. dont forget that the trap speed is an average.
Last edited by GTKage; Mar 4, 2006 at 08:41 AM.
Mar 4, 2006, 08:33 AM
#163
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by boomtown
116mph is suspiciously high. This thread smells a bit foul. As for snow tyres yes - taller tyres = more mph but also slower acceleration. There is no free ride when it comes to physics.
And ~Evilevo~ for the record you're an idiot.
And ~Evilevo~ for the record you're an idiot.
Mar 4, 2006, 09:22 AM
#164
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Even so, you can only run 22-23psi on pump gas. I still wouldn't expect anywhere near 370-380whp. 335-345 maybe, but that would be 113-114mph traps, not 116. You're about 30whp ahead of every other IX with your mods, which is already 30whp ahead of 05s with the same mods. This means you gained 100whp over stock with exhaust, mbc, tune. I usually expect/predict 60-70whp, so you're getting another 30-40whp from NeverNeverLand or something. What's sickening is that with your mph, you could be doing low 11.8s if you could figure out the launch.
Hmm, one more thing, your rev limiter must be pretty high, because you can't even hit 116mph at 7800rpm on that short 4th gear. You'd have to be around 8000rpm, or did you shift to 5th?
Hmm, one more thing, your rev limiter must be pretty high, because you can't even hit 116mph at 7800rpm on that short 4th gear. You'd have to be around 8000rpm, or did you shift to 5th?
The difference from 113 traps to 116 could be the track, the weather, the altitude, the timing equipment, or simply just the car. Get a grip dude.
Mar 4, 2006, 03:48 PM
#165
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I was out and about doing some twisty runs today and I took my car a couple times to 7000 in 4th. Top speed was about 105-ish. It was hard to get a good look while turning at those speeds. Getting to 116 in 4th would be pretty crazy!