Stock VIII turbo 11.509@124.18
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock VIII turbo 11.509@124.18
Well, all most got the boot. It was 98 degrees on the track so im pretty happy with the results. OK warrtalon. I did my best to get the weight sorted out. we have to do a little math tho! the truck scale said 3300 sut they round up so its between 3250-3300 #. OK, at the time i have ( 4 ) 5 gallon cans of e85 in the trunk, with my lap top and small tool set. when i did the runs i pulled the rear set set, the spare tire, and took all my tools lap top and junk off the floor board. I would guess this
lap top: 25#s
gas : 125#s
seats and junk 100#s at most
so, this would mean car by its self would be 2950-3000#
me in it 3100-3150 during runs
No changes made to the tune. could have leaned it out a bit, but it was hot out and played it safe. Boost 28psi spike falls to 23.5 or so. My afrs were 11.8-12.0 at wot. Gas was pump E85. Tires were are fedrals with 22 psi for the runs. Im going to the beach house this weekend so i cant hit the portland track. next weekend ill try to get kicked out. fyi, i think i found a trick to getting a better 60' .
lap top: 25#s
gas : 125#s
seats and junk 100#s at most
so, this would mean car by its self would be 2950-3000#
me in it 3100-3150 during runs
No changes made to the tune. could have leaned it out a bit, but it was hot out and played it safe. Boost 28psi spike falls to 23.5 or so. My afrs were 11.8-12.0 at wot. Gas was pump E85. Tires were are fedrals with 22 psi for the runs. Im going to the beach house this weekend so i cant hit the portland track. next weekend ill try to get kicked out. fyi, i think i found a trick to getting a better 60' .
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Much better with shaving weight - the car can move so much better without all the weight. 3150 is nice and light - got me by about 150lbs.
The traps just still don't make sense when you compare the ET with the 60'. You beat my best run by 1/1000th of a second (bastard) but with an extra 6.5mph. My 60' was 1.66 to your 1.69. Looking at the splits, I was ahead by 1/10th at the 1/8th with 4 less mph, so considering your traps seem to be consistent, then my only guess is that your 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 are slower than molasses. If you can figure out the shifting, then with this 60', you have 11.0s waiting on you.
The traps just still don't make sense when you compare the ET with the 60'. You beat my best run by 1/1000th of a second (bastard) but with an extra 6.5mph. My 60' was 1.66 to your 1.69. Looking at the splits, I was ahead by 1/10th at the 1/8th with 4 less mph, so considering your traps seem to be consistent, then my only guess is that your 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 are slower than molasses. If you can figure out the shifting, then with this 60', you have 11.0s waiting on you.
Trending Topics
#9
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Much better with shaving weight - the car can move so much better without all the weight. 3150 is nice and light - got me by about 150lbs.
The traps just still don't make sense when you compare the ET with the 60'. You beat my best run by 1/1000th of a second (bastard) but with an extra 6.5mph. My 60' was 1.66 to your 1.69. Looking at the splits, I was ahead by 1/10th at the 1/8th with 4 less mph, so considering your traps seem to be consistent, then my only guess is that your 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 are slower than molasses. If you can figure out the shifting, then with this 60', you have 11.0s waiting on you.
The traps just still don't make sense when you compare the ET with the 60'. You beat my best run by 1/1000th of a second (bastard) but with an extra 6.5mph. My 60' was 1.66 to your 1.69. Looking at the splits, I was ahead by 1/10th at the 1/8th with 4 less mph, so considering your traps seem to be consistent, then my only guess is that your 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 are slower than molasses. If you can figure out the shifting, then with this 60', you have 11.0s waiting on you.
Last edited by Turbojunkie; Sep 12, 2008 at 11:27 AM.
#11
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
1.69 is far from horrible. I only hit 1.66-1.68 regularly, and I'm hitting 7.35 in the 1/8th @ 93. The 3-4 is also the easiest shift, so that can't be where you're losing time. You are losing all your time in the first half between the 60' and 1/8th, which points to the 1-2 and 2-3. I also do my 3-4 before the 1/8th, but you may not. Either the early shifts are terribly slow, or the traps are reading too high.
#12
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1.69 is far from horrible. I only hit 1.66-1.68 regularly, and I'm hitting 7.35 in the 1/8th @ 93. The 3-4 is also the easiest shift, so that can't be where you're losing time. You are losing all your time in the first half between the 60' and 1/8th, which points to the 1-2 and 2-3. I also do my 3-4 before the 1/8th, but you may not. Either the early shifts are terribly slow, or the traps are reading too high.
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Yeah, that's why I said it's the shifting. I noted above that your traps were consistently this high, which leaves only the shifting. The 2-3 is definitely the hardest shift, imo, but we're talking about half a second lost due to shifting if the traps are legit.
I also have a slip that says 120, but it's wayyyyyyyyyy off. The difference is that only happened once for me, but you have lots of 122+ slips.
I also have a slip that says 120, but it's wayyyyyyyyyy off. The difference is that only happened once for me, but you have lots of 122+ slips.
#14
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks man keep it up and you will get there. Try setting the tire pressure at 25 psi and set your 2step at 5.5k and slip it buddy im cutting 1.58 with all-season tires.Your mph is there im trapping 122 at 11.0 your there man .