The vids are with my friend. Waiting for him to get the rest up. Hopefully today.

 

See if this works.

http://s60.photobucket.com/albums/h1...nt=Ant1076.flv

Fixed. I think. For some reason for me it only plays a couple seconds then stops. Just hit play and fast forward a couple seconds.

 

Vid works ok!

 

just for everyone that didnt kno. that vid is of my fisrt pass. my last run was the 10.67 which hopefully will be up today.

 

way too rub it in...lol

 

Sick man... congrats.

What rpm are you shifting at and what clutch are you using ?

 

haha dont worry joe. next season i have a feeling things are going to be alot better then this one.

 

Awesome time bud! Congrats

 

shifting at 8k and a quartermaster

 

Yes i have the vids, but i am having some issues ripping them to my computer. the pases he made were sick. well worth it.

good job guy, and i am going to bust my a$$ to get those up soon.

 

Thank you sir.

 

only needing 23psi to make 491awhp is amazing but even more amazing is trapping 133mph like that, it doesn't make sense to me. Not hating at all, just trying to understand how that works.

I'm guessing the 93/c16 blend is allowing quite a bit of timing, the head/cams are flowing really good hence the 23psi but the 491awhp and trapping 133 with 3300lb car + drivers weight. Buschur's dyno is stingy and those cars require about 550awhp to run 133mph traps. Is that DTM dyno even more stingy?

 

Very Good points.
Lets reiterate.
The head work combined with the proper cams make this combination work very well. We decided to run a standard off the shelf 35r just for ****s and giggles. Anthonys original turbo choice was a bit different. But we have had such great results thus far why go thru the trouble of changing it out?
93 mix with c16 is just for safety. The tune that is in the car is his original pump gas tune that he ran 11.1 on weeks ago. I suggested running a mixture for the colder weather and for any boost spikes in 4rth gear.
If anything it should have made the car safer and slower. The engine combination is similar to what we have run on our TA car. BSFC rates are exceptional and efficiency is much higher than your standard 2.0 or 2.3 offered on the market today. When we made a post a while back about our TA car making 490+ on 17 psi it was harder to believe for most, but we have built quite a few now to prove that fluke is not in our terminology.
One more example, we have seen and tested a couple of cars that dyno'd in ohio. If we were to compare dyno sheets it would show that in one case a car making 587 WHP made only 489 on ours. BUT let me be clear weather makes a huge difference and cannot be accurately depicted in this or any comparison. All this tells us is that we don't read any higher.

 

Nice runs, can't wait to see more videos of the car.
Do you happen to have pics of the car?

 

Yes i know it may seem like we are doubting things but you must admit w/ the info given it doesn't seem to add up to what the majority of us here see on our cars and others posted here.

I know boost pressure reading can vary especially w/ a set-up like yours but just like Mellon said w/ only 491hp and and ok 60ft a mid 10sec run at over 130 mph is outstanding

Obviously the car is moving well after the launch as evidence of the 1/8mi speed.

My car only weighs 3030 w/ me in it and it took just over 500hp on our lower reading MD to trap over 130mph and go mid 10's........maybe their dyno reads lower than most DJ's kind of like the one AMS uses.

Good job once again i check out the vid later