Batmobile goes 10.67 on 23psi
Very Good points.
Lets reiterate.
The head work combined with the proper cams make this combination work very well. We decided to run a standard off the shelf 35r just for ****s and giggles. Anthonys original turbo choice was a bit different. But we have had such great results thus far why go thru the trouble of changing it out?
93 mix with c16 is just for safety. The tune that is in the car is his original pump gas tune that he ran 11.1 on weeks ago. I suggested running a mixture for the colder weather and for any boost spikes in 4rth gear.
If anything it should have made the car safer and slower. The engine combination is similar to what we have run on our TA car. BSFC rates are exceptional and efficiency is much higher than your standard 2.0 or 2.3 offered on the market today. When we made a post a while back about our TA car making 490+ on 17 psi it was harder to believe for most, but we have built quite a few now to prove that fluke is not in our terminology.
One more example, we have seen and tested a couple of cars that dyno'd in ohio. If we were to compare dyno sheets it would show that in one case a car making 587 WHP made only 489 on ours. BUT let me be clear weather makes a huge difference and cannot be accurately depicted in this or any comparison. All this tells us is that we don't read any higher.
Lets reiterate.
The head work combined with the proper cams make this combination work very well. We decided to run a standard off the shelf 35r just for ****s and giggles. Anthonys original turbo choice was a bit different. But we have had such great results thus far why go thru the trouble of changing it out?
93 mix with c16 is just for safety. The tune that is in the car is his original pump gas tune that he ran 11.1 on weeks ago. I suggested running a mixture for the colder weather and for any boost spikes in 4rth gear.
If anything it should have made the car safer and slower. The engine combination is similar to what we have run on our TA car. BSFC rates are exceptional and efficiency is much higher than your standard 2.0 or 2.3 offered on the market today. When we made a post a while back about our TA car making 490+ on 17 psi it was harder to believe for most, but we have built quite a few now to prove that fluke is not in our terminology.
One more example, we have seen and tested a couple of cars that dyno'd in ohio. If we were to compare dyno sheets it would show that in one case a car making 587 WHP made only 489 on ours. BUT let me be clear weather makes a huge difference and cannot be accurately depicted in this or any comparison. All this tells us is that we don't read any higher.
Here's one of my slips that looks almost exactly like the OP's when we were making about 530 (MD) at 34 psi lol
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Very Good points.
Lets reiterate.
The head work combined with the proper cams make this combination work very well. We decided to run a standard off the shelf 35r just for ****s and giggles. Anthonys original turbo choice was a bit different. But we have had such great results thus far why go thru the trouble of changing it out?
93 mix with c16 is just for safety. The tune that is in the car is his original pump gas tune that he ran 11.1 on weeks ago. I suggested running a mixture for the colder weather and for any boost spikes in 4rth gear.
If anything it should have made the car safer and slower. The engine combination is similar to what we have run on our TA car. BSFC rates are exceptional and efficiency is much higher than your standard 2.0 or 2.3 offered on the market today. When we made a post a while back about our TA car making 490+ on 17 psi it was harder to believe for most, but we have built quite a few now to prove that fluke is not in our terminology.
One more example, we have seen and tested a couple of cars that dyno'd in ohio. If we were to compare dyno sheets it would show that in one case a car making 587 WHP made only 489 on ours. BUT let me be clear weather makes a huge difference and cannot be accurately depicted in this or any comparison. All this tells us is that we don't read any higher.
Lets reiterate.
The head work combined with the proper cams make this combination work very well. We decided to run a standard off the shelf 35r just for ****s and giggles. Anthonys original turbo choice was a bit different. But we have had such great results thus far why go thru the trouble of changing it out?
93 mix with c16 is just for safety. The tune that is in the car is his original pump gas tune that he ran 11.1 on weeks ago. I suggested running a mixture for the colder weather and for any boost spikes in 4rth gear.
If anything it should have made the car safer and slower. The engine combination is similar to what we have run on our TA car. BSFC rates are exceptional and efficiency is much higher than your standard 2.0 or 2.3 offered on the market today. When we made a post a while back about our TA car making 490+ on 17 psi it was harder to believe for most, but we have built quite a few now to prove that fluke is not in our terminology.
One more example, we have seen and tested a couple of cars that dyno'd in ohio. If we were to compare dyno sheets it would show that in one case a car making 587 WHP made only 489 on ours. BUT let me be clear weather makes a huge difference and cannot be accurately depicted in this or any comparison. All this tells us is that we don't read any higher.
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: in dem cheeks
