Case Study # 120- 2005 MR - 350 TQ
Originally Posted by joeymia
because I was assuming he was being sacrastic. who in their right mind would think headers on a stock mr with no cams would yield 30whp/30wtrq
Originally Posted by thadon84
man joeymia what do you have against truth squad and Warrtalon or as you call it truf squad
Originally Posted by NoTec
I wasnt being sarcastic at all. I'm in my right mind. Some parts no matter what they are can yield negligable power gains while that exact same part developed by an engineer who knows what the hell he is doing can be responsible for a substancial increase in power. Like I said originally, I knew nothing of this header and any part that gains good power is a welcome part to me. I dont make sarcastic remarks without using smileys anyways. You're an excellent judge of character!

Originally Posted by joeymia
sorry warrtalon has mislead you. cams will perform much better than headers on evos.
Also, what is this hypocrisy you speak of? At what point have I been hypocritical? Critical? Yes. Hypocritical? No...I don't do anything that I tell others not to do.
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
JUST FYI INFO guys - I don't post these to endorse the customer's particular choice of mods - I am just trying to give a variety of mods and show how they work for informational purposes
Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list
To each his / her own !
i just tune the car !
Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list
To each his / her own !
i just tune the car !
Warrtalon, I think you must have had some bad donuts for dinner or something. I think your posts in this thread are a bit misleading. It's well known that a header can't even come close to cams in terms of either peak power gains or area under the curve. Even the RNR seems to kill low end torque at the expense of top end power, as you'd expect from the design.
No one should infer that a part will make power/tq gains proportional to its cost, which is what you are implying is the case here. If header A cost X and header B cost Y, and header C cost between X and Y, then therefore header C should make power between header A and B? C'mon, even you know better than to imply that.
While I see that you are only posting that it would reasonable to expect such a relationship, and I admit that you have posted nothing false, it sure is misleading! And not to belittle the EvoM masses, but at least one person is going to leave this thread with the thought "Warrtalon says a $600 header will make gains comparable to $600 cams and had a dyno plot to prove it, and he's Warrtalon and Truth Squad, so it must be true." Remember, Warrtalon = EvoM influence/power, so post responsibly
No one should infer that a part will make power/tq gains proportional to its cost, which is what you are implying is the case here. If header A cost X and header B cost Y, and header C cost between X and Y, then therefore header C should make power between header A and B? C'mon, even you know better than to imply that.
While I see that you are only posting that it would reasonable to expect such a relationship, and I admit that you have posted nothing false, it sure is misleading! And not to belittle the EvoM masses, but at least one person is going to leave this thread with the thought "Warrtalon says a $600 header will make gains comparable to $600 cams and had a dyno plot to prove it, and he's Warrtalon and Truth Squad, so it must be true." Remember, Warrtalon = EvoM influence/power, so post responsibly
Last edited by EVO8LTW; Dec 6, 2005 at 04:43 AM.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
JUST FYI INFO guys - I don't post these to endorse the customer's particular choice of mods - I am just trying to give a variety of mods and show how they work for informational purposes
Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list
To each his / her own !
i just tune the car !
Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list
To each his / her own !
i just tune the car !
Although the question of this car making more or less power with cams vs. header is really interesting, it is a moot point. No one here knows the owner's reason for choosing his mods. Perhaps he doesn't want to do anything internal - just bolt ons. That is pretty common. So calling someone a hypocrite for not bashing him is absurd.
By the way, Al, nice job on the tune! That torque band is pretty fat!
EVOlutionary
By the way, Al, nice job on the tune! That torque band is pretty fat!
EVOlutionary
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I think David Buschur is planning to test the RNR header and some other headers soon
I have not seen any significant variations of cars with and without headers on stock turbos - this is looking at dozens and dozens of cars
I have not seen any significant variations of cars with and without headers on stock turbos - this is looking at dozens and dozens of cars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DynoFlash
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
20
Apr 19, 2008 11:46 AM
DynoFlash
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
321
Jan 22, 2007 08:21 PM
rednoseevo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Apr 18, 2006 08:12 PM







