Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

Case Study # 120- 2005 MR - 350 TQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #16  
thadon84's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
man joeymia what do you have against truth squad and Warrtalon or as you call it truf squad
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
NoTec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by joeymia
because I was assuming he was being sacrastic. who in their right mind would think headers on a stock mr with no cams would yield 30whp/30wtrq
I wasnt being sarcastic at all. I'm in my right mind. Some parts no matter what they are can yield negligable power gains while that exact same part developed by an engineer who knows what the hell he is doing can be responsible for a substancial increase in power. Like I said originally, I knew nothing of this header and any part that gains good power is a welcome part to me. I dont make sarcastic remarks without using smileys anyways. You're an excellent judge of character!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:25 PM
  #18  
joeymia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
Originally Posted by thadon84
man joeymia what do you have against truth squad and Warrtalon or as you call it truf squad
Well mainly because our man Warrtalon member of the Truth Squad has been ranting on and on about "worthless mods" since i can remember. He has been known to make fun of people for spending outrageous amounts of money for parts that can be found cheaper or produce small gains for the price. This post is different... This car has over $2500 easily invested into it. The dyno results are not that impressive since it was tuned on racegas. Also spent 600 dollars on a set of headers over cams etc... I don't care what someone buys for their cars but there has been countless posts about Warrtalon belittling people for doing what this MR has done. The hypocrisy is just to much for me tonight.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #19  
joeymia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
Originally Posted by NoTec
I wasnt being sarcastic at all. I'm in my right mind. Some parts no matter what they are can yield negligable power gains while that exact same part developed by an engineer who knows what the hell he is doing can be responsible for a substancial increase in power. Like I said originally, I knew nothing of this header and any part that gains good power is a welcome part to me. I dont make sarcastic remarks without using smileys anyways. You're an excellent judge of character!
sorry warrtalon has mislead you. cams will perform much better than headers on evos.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #20  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by joeymia
sorry warrtalon has mislead you. cams will perform much better than headers on evos.
I have not misinformed anyone. You just have a grudge against me and are not reading everything closely. Again, RNR is claiming gains 50% higher than what we normally see from a set of cams. Is this the RNR header? No, but it's also not the Megan header. There are significant gains to be had with a well-built header - that is a fact.

Also, what is this hypocrisy you speak of? At what point have I been hypocritical? Critical? Yes. Hypocritical? No...I don't do anything that I tell others not to do.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #21  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
JUST FYI INFO guys - I don't post these to endorse the customer's particular choice of mods - I am just trying to give a variety of mods and show how they work for informational purposes

Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list

To each his / her own !


i just tune the car !
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 04:22 AM
  #22  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Warrtalon, I think you must have had some bad donuts for dinner or something. I think your posts in this thread are a bit misleading. It's well known that a header can't even come close to cams in terms of either peak power gains or area under the curve. Even the RNR seems to kill low end torque at the expense of top end power, as you'd expect from the design.

No one should infer that a part will make power/tq gains proportional to its cost, which is what you are implying is the case here. If header A cost X and header B cost Y, and header C cost between X and Y, then therefore header C should make power between header A and B? C'mon, even you know better than to imply that.

While I see that you are only posting that it would reasonable to expect such a relationship, and I admit that you have posted nothing false, it sure is misleading! And not to belittle the EvoM masses, but at least one person is going to leave this thread with the thought "Warrtalon says a $600 header will make gains comparable to $600 cams and had a dyno plot to prove it, and he's Warrtalon and Truth Squad, so it must be true." Remember, Warrtalon = EvoM influence/power, so post responsibly

Last edited by EVO8LTW; Dec 6, 2005 at 04:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 04:52 AM
  #23  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
JUST FYI INFO guys - I don't post these to endorse the customer's particular choice of mods - I am just trying to give a variety of mods and show how they work for informational purposes

Personally a header would be the last choice on my own personal list

To each his / her own !


i just tune the car !
Great job on the tune Al, how did the construction of those headers look?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 05:12 AM
  #24  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
jeez Al,
way to start a war
lols
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:07 PM
  #25  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Although the question of this car making more or less power with cams vs. header is really interesting, it is a moot point. No one here knows the owner's reason for choosing his mods. Perhaps he doesn't want to do anything internal - just bolt ons. That is pretty common. So calling someone a hypocrite for not bashing him is absurd.

By the way, Al, nice job on the tune! That torque band is pretty fat!

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #26  
RnR Racing's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Warrtalon, just an FYI we don't claim 44whp from our header. I would say most customerS should see 20-30hp after tuning. The car that was dynoed was a surprise to us as well.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #27  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I think David Buschur is planning to test the RNR header and some other headers soon


I have not seen any significant variations of cars with and without headers on stock turbos - this is looking at dozens and dozens of cars
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DynoFlash
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
20
Apr 19, 2008 11:46 AM
DynoFlash
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
321
Jan 22, 2007 08:21 PM
rednoseevo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Apr 18, 2006 08:12 PM
04BLUBYU
For Sale - Cars For Sale
27
Sep 17, 2005 09:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.