Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

C16 vs Pump gas - Dyno Test Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
C16 vs Pump gas - Dyno Test Results

After last week when some body asserted that adding 2 1/2 gallons of C-16 would dramatically effect the a/f ratio on a Evo I made a mental note to test the situation on the dyno

Here is what we did this car had pump gas tune - 21 psi of boost

Mods - HKS RS Intake - walbro pump - HKS 264 cams - 3" exhuast - MBC - Dyno Flash

Run 8 made with 1/4 tank pump gas

Poured in 5 gallons C-16 ran the car 5 minutes on the dyno to get the gas mix in

Run 9 made with 5 gallons C-16

My conclusion is that the C-16 has little or no difference on the power or the a/f - the slight variation is more than accounted for by normal run to run variance on the dyno
Attached Thumbnails C16 vs Pump gas - Dyno Test Results-c16.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #2  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Science is the verification and testing of theories to find out the accurate conclusion

Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 06:51 AM
  #3  
Stinkapuss's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Southern MD
Good info!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 07:04 AM
  #4  
99AllTurbo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: NY
The a/f graph shows it getting rich from about 5k rpm and on (prob from boost taper), so it looks like there's more power to be discovered if leaned out some up top.

Also, was the car retuned after adding the race fuel? It's not noted so I'm asking.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #5  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by 99AllTurbo
The a/f graph shows it getting rich from about 5k rpm and on (prob from boost taper), so it looks like there's more power to be discovered if leaned out some up top.

Also, was the car retuned after adding the race fuel? It's not noted so I'm asking.
Yes - the car was re-tuned after we finished this test. For purposes of this test we did not touch anything - its a A - B test just to determine what if any changes would occur
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #6  
bryans2k's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I think it would have been seen a bit more to add 5 gallons to an empty tank rather than a tank with 3-4 gallons of pump gas and when you say pump gas what kind of pump gas? 91? 92? 93? 94?

bryan
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
JDM-Spec.com's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Southern CA
Nice number, what kind of octane fuel is used ?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #8  
rebelzx's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by bryans2k
I think it would have been seen a bit more to add 5 gallons to an empty tank rather than a tank with 3-4 gallons of pump gas and when you say pump gas what kind of pump gas? 91? 92? 93? 94?

bryan
If the mix of pump and C16 wasn't a high enough octane, we would have seen knock activity on the high boost pulls that followed this test. No knock on high boost = very high octane. It was 94 octane pump gas.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EVOllie
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
73
Dec 11, 2007 09:33 AM
IXToes
E85 / Ethanol
2
Jun 21, 2007 08:06 AM
FullBlown
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
27
Jan 18, 2007 06:03 PM
YellowEvo03
Evo General
30
Aug 16, 2005 07:00 PM
RnR Racing
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
122
Dec 28, 2004 08:54 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 AM.