Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

E85 - P0171 too lean code - Long Term Fuel Trims + 12.5%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2014 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
E85 - P0171 too lean code - Long Term Fuel Trims + 12.5%

I recently had a motor built and tuned for both E85/93 octane.

I've been having a few problems with codes lately. First was a P0403 EGR insufficient flow (I know it was and EGR insufficient flow code, I think 403 was the number). It turned out that the small hose that connects to the bottom of the EGR valve blew off (or wasn't connected). I fixed that by zippy-tieing it as tight as possible after I reinstalled the hose.

A week or so later I threw a P0171. I searched for another boost/vacuum leak and found another small hose disconnected below the intake manifold (behind the engine) feeding to the EGR solenoid. I fixed that the same way - zip-tied tight as I could make it.

Car (It's an IX) is set to about 32-33 psi for boost when running on E85. I have 1800cc FIC injectors.

Car has a wide band that is set for lambda value. When cruising and idling lambda is at 1.0, or darn close. Car seems to run good.

When I called my builder/tuner the first thing he asked me was "how many tanks of E85 have you used". I have only filled up with 1 tank of E85 locally and I didn't test it. What he believes is that the ethanol content may be off and this may be causing the lean codes and the rich adjustment. When I talked to him, I didn't realize that it was at 12.5, which I believe is the max rich the PCM will adjust.

My thought and question is, isn't +12.5 for LTFT alot to account for ethanol content variation? I have not done a boost leak test and this is one of my next steps.

I ordered a tactrix cable and I may be adjusting the injectors (with instruction from my tuner) but I keep scratching my head thinking that the 12.5 is just a lot to account for only ethanol variation (say if my E85 was actually e75 or so)

I could always drain the tank and see if the problem exists after filling up with 93 and switching to my 93 tune....

I did test E85 from a local station today (not the one I bought my last tank from) and it was close to E85. (Probably say about E83 or E84) - I could always fill up with this (I have a half tank now) and see if the LTFT's go down right?

Last edited by Jp7; Sep 29, 2014 at 09:35 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
no other ideas guys?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
hutch959's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 110
From: Chattanooga, TN
we need to see the data bro.....

wideband data, logs... something
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Originally Posted by hutch959
we need to see the data bro.....

wideband data, logs... something
I know, just got my tactrix openport 2.0 in the mail today.
I have to get the software installed on my laptop and set things up to log. It is an autometer wb so I need to figure out how to tie that in.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 08:51 AM
  #5  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Didn't know Autometer sells WB. Are you sure it's not a narrow-band they sell as "Air Fuel" gauge?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 11:17 AM
  #6  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Ev0ikon
Didn't know Autometer sells WB. Are you sure it's not a narrow-band they sell as "Air Fuel" gauge?
yes, totally positive. It runs between AFR's 20, to 10. Uses a bosch lsu 4.2.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2014 | 04:44 PM
  #7  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Update: I boost-leak tested the car today, and filled up with fresh E85. E85 was actually tested at about E83.5 or so (see photo)



Immediately I found ANOTHER small vacuum hose under the intake manifold that had "boosted" itself loose. - corrected with a zip-tie.

I heard a hiss around the intake manifold/fuel injector area and it turns out number 3 fuel injector wasnt installed correctly. The rubber ring seal is bubbling out. I verified by spraying soapy water on it, you can see bubbles form. The other injectors don't have this problem.

My BOV is a Tial QR and it is brand new (the builder installed this as well). When I boost leak tested it I had to disconnect the recirculating hose that runs back to the atmosphere side of the turbo - this is leaking air real bad too. Should I be capping this side of it off when I do the test? I held it with my hand so I could search for other leaks. Even with my hand sealing it I was not getting more than 3 or 4 PSI. I didn't turn up the pressure because I know I have that injector leak and I want to fix that before further boost leak testing.

With the fixed vacuum line I found the long term fuel trim was still at +12.5 on the drive home, so it did not fix the problem. Car starts and idles much better though. Before (when it was stone cold with the vacuum leaks) it would not even idle without stalling.





Last edited by Jp7; Oct 12, 2014 at 04:53 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 06:54 PM
  #8  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 161
From: San Francisco
I think you have three options: (a) change your tuner, (b) learn how to do it yourself, (c) take it back to your tuner and ask him to finish the job properly.
The reason your LTFT is positive is probably because the tune is not right. If you had less than E85 this would make it run rich, driving the trims negative. If you had a boost leak this would make it run rich under mild boost driving trims negative and slighlty lean in decel or idle. The fact that they are positive and maxed out means that your injectors are possibly not scaled correctly. This probably means that your tuner has not done a very good job, and you should consider taking your business somewhere else.

If you want a full diagnosis you are going to have to post up your ROM and logs showing RPM, Load 1 byte, STFT, LTFT Low, LTFT mid, WBO2 AFR, Boost, Air Flow Hz and IPW during idle and cruise. Without this detail you can't expect an answer of any value.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
hutch959's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 110
From: Chattanooga, TN
^^^^ boom...

what he said
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 10:42 PM
  #10  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Update:

Car was down from November until September. I've been working on some other things. I have since rebuilt the fuel rail with a slightly different setup and I removed and replaced the injectors. Car has not been driven on E85 yet but it runs great on 93. I believe the problem may have been from a vacuum leak on that number 3 fuel injector seal. After I reinstalled the injectors carefully with P80 lubricant on the seals that appear to be sealing right. Last november I tried to boost leak test this and I had all kinds of air coming out of this seal. I have not really boosted hard but it idles great now with the 93. I may not have the time to switch back to E85 and test this before the car goes away from winter but I am code-free now.

Last edited by Jp7; Oct 4, 2015 at 10:44 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Jp7
Update:

Car was down from November until September. I've been working on some other things. I have since rebuilt the fuel rail with a slightly different setup and I removed and replaced the injectors. Car has not been driven on E85 yet but it runs great on 93. I believe the problem may have been from a vacuum leak on that number 3 fuel injector seal. After I reinstalled the injectors carefully with P80 lubricant on the seals that appear to be sealing right. Last november I tried to boost leak test this and I had all kinds of air coming out of this seal. I have not really boosted hard but it idles great now with the 93. I may not have the time to switch back to E85 and test this before the car goes away from winter but I am code-free now.
What did the injectors tips look like when you removed them? Did you use the same injectors?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 02:04 PM
  #12  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Originally Posted by mrfred
What did the injectors tips look like when you removed them? Did you use the same injectors?
Injectors were sitting on my mechanics cart for a few months while I built my zietronics flexfuel plumbing setup. They looked good to me, I couldn't see anything obvious.

Same injectors were installed again but I put the seals in correctly. It was difficult. I have the blue FIC seals. They are REALLY tight in there. Viton? I think?

I had to install the seals into the intake manifold first. I then installed the injectors into my buschur fuel rail (I lubricated everything with P80 assembly lubricant for fuel system parts). I slowly torqued the rail down and drew it into the seals. I took my time and it looks pretty good now. (way better than before when the bottom was all bubbled out.)
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 02:29 PM
  #13  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Jp7
Injectors were sitting on my mechanics cart for a few months while I built my zietronics flexfuel plumbing setup. They looked good to me, I couldn't see anything obvious.

Same injectors were installed again but I put the seals in correctly. It was difficult. I have the blue FIC seals. They are REALLY tight in there. Viton? I think?

I had to install the seals into the intake manifold first. I then installed the injectors into my buschur fuel rail (I lubricated everything with P80 assembly lubricant for fuel system parts). I slowly torqued the rail down and drew it into the seals. I took my time and it looks pretty good now. (way better than before when the bottom was all bubbled out.)
ok, because one cause of a lean condition are injectors getting badly clogged. When running E85, sometimes a thick, black sludge/gunk can build up on the injector tips that can cause this. Its quite obvious.

New injector seals at the intake manifold are not easy to seat properly. They definitely need a bit of lube and good alignment to go in correctly.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Originally Posted by mrfred
ok, because one cause of a lean condition are injectors getting badly clogged. When running E85, sometimes a thick, black sludge/gunk can build up on the injector tips that can cause this. Its quite obvious.

New injector seals at the intake manifold are not easy to seat properly. They definitely need a bit of lube and good alignment to go in correctly.
Funny thing is yesterday this code came back on me. I filled up with E85 and switched to my E85 tune right around the 4th of July. I think this is the 3rd tank of E85 I've used since I had my engine built in fall of 2014. (keep in mind, I drive this car a few hundred miles a year usually)

This may or may not be related to E85 contamination. I did find one of the little hoses that is underneath the intake manifold was blown off of a "T" fitting junction. I fixed that and started the car. Long term went down from 12.5 to about 10.9. Not as much as I expected. I have not driven the car though. This was just in the garage idling to warm it up.

I did drive this car from July 4th till now more than usual. I put about 170 miles on the tank of E85. My tank is just about empty now. I do have an ethanol content sensor and the content varies between 79% and 83% so my ethanol content is good. I am wondering if I have buildup on my injectors contributing to this problem. My fuel pressure at rest with the factory regulator is about 38 psi. Keep in mind I have a fuel pressuge gauge on my fuel rail. This is being affected because I do have the vacuum line connected to the regulator. This is the same fuel pressure I have always seen before this code popped up yesterday.

I bought a smoke test machine today so I'm excited to get that soon. I want to check for boost/vacuum leaks. More to come.

I was going throw some sea-form in the tank and see if that would help the injectors (assuming those are part of the problem).

My tank is literally empty now anyways.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 10:32 PM
  #15  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Third tank of E85 since 2014?!?!

So, does that mean you have E85 sitting in the car for more than a year?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:11 AM.