Notices
ECU Flash

calculated load taper?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
texrex2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Houston
calculated load taper?

edited

Last edited by texrex2002; Mar 30, 2007 at 01:05 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #2  
Rob W.'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
Why do you correlate 180 load to be 13psi?

Load will always taper as rpms increase (since boost is tapering off).
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
kapolani's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Rob W.
Why do you correlate 180 load to be 13psi?

Load will always taper as rpms increase (since boost is tapering off).
All things being equal - if the above is true - say you have some abnormal boost drop off towards redline - can you use this calculated load value to verify boost drop off?

For intsance - if you're tapering to an abnormally low 15pis - will the calculated load value be low as well?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
Rob W.'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
I don't know if anyone has ever tried to correlate load back to boost. They are definitely directly proportional, but I don't think it's an accurate way to measure boost. If you see a large dropoff of load, you probably have a large dropoff of boost, but the only way to know if it's 'abnormal' would probably be to have an actual gauge.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 01:33 PM
  #5  
gogoevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
noooo i run 25 pounds flat out till redline and my load tapers down about 60 points or so also, do not try to guess boost from load, if you are on the stock turbo then you taper down to 18 or so just like everyone else
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
That's correct. Boost is not proportional to load. Load is more directly proportional to a mass airflow/revolution, like g/rev.

The reason why load isn't proportional to boost is because volumetric efficiency drops off at increasing RPMs.


Eric
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #7  
texrex2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Houston
edited

Last edited by texrex2002; Mar 30, 2007 at 01:05 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #8  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Load is a factor of Volumetric efficiency.. Boost is only a component of VE and therefore doesn't really correlate to load the way you'd expect.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #9  
Evol.ved's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by texrex2002
damn. I'm just going to have to get a "Stealth" boost gauge somehow then, and ramp up the "desired boost" a little at high rpm's.

Don't lots of turbo timers have boost gauges of sorts built in?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #10  
sonicnofadz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 3
From: Baltimore, MD
Are you getting any knock? Maybe you are knocking in the higher RPM's causing your timing to retard (and consequently taper the load down).
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 03:27 AM
  #11  
jcsbanks's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
I don't have the link, but I posted a graph on here of my calculated load against the JDM 3 bar MAP sensor. There was the expected divergence at high RPM from reducing VE.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #12  
texrex2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
Are you getting any knock? Maybe you are knocking in the higher RPM's causing your timing to retard (and consequently taper the load down).
no knock at all.

Last edited by texrex2002; Mar 30, 2007 at 01:05 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
gogoevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
THATS NOT THE PROBLEM AS WE SAID BEFORE, i dont think you have any problems unless you feel as tho you are low on power or something, if not don't worry about CACULATED, or guessed, or estimated, not for sure, load
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #14  
SophieSleeps's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Butthole, MA
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
Load is a factor of Volumetric efficiency.. Boost is only a component of VE and therefore doesn't really correlate to load the way you'd expect.
How do most people tune their AF then?
I tune my other car with a speed density setup.
So I tune everything over atmospheric pressure at 11.5. It's very simple and easy for me to do.

On this car, since load isn't directly related to boost...at what load do you want to hit your specific AF's at?

Or should I just guess a nice one (11.5) , and then start playing with timing until knock?

My original plans were to tune everything above 100 load value to 11.5 and then start playing with timing.

But I'm not so sure that is the best way about it.
Do people taper their AFR's richer as load increases?
Suggestions?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 03:19 AM
  #15  
jonas001's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Originally Posted by Rob W.
I don't know if anyone has ever tried to correlate load back to boost. They are definitely directly proportional, but I don't think it's an accurate way to measure boost. If you see a large dropoff of load, you probably have a large dropoff of boost, but the only way to know if it's 'abnormal' would probably be to have an actual gauge.
It is very possible to do this as long as there is no mods that change Volumetiric efficiency, i.e. cams or strokers
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 AM.