Notices
ECU Flash

tune for better gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2007, 09:10 AM
  #31  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,069
Received 1,044 Likes on 762 Posts
Originally Posted by nj1266
Not really. The MS3 also has direct injection but it runs even richer than the Evo. I give GM credit for tuning the car correctly. It is refreshing to see a stock turbo car that does not rely on timing advance and a rich mixture to produce power.
Ya rly, they can run it that 'lean' because of DI. Do that with a non DI turbo car and I'll help you pick up the pieces of liquid pistons off the highway.
Old Mar 15, 2007, 10:16 AM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
Ya rly, they can run it that 'lean' because of DI. Do that with a non DI turbo car and I'll help you pick up the pieces of liquid pistons off the highway.
You missed the point. Just because the car has DI, does not mean that it will be tuned properly. BMW 335, MS3 and GXP have DI, but only the GXP and 335 take advantage of DI. That was my point, but I guess I did not make it clear.
Old Mar 15, 2007, 10:54 AM
  #33  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,069
Received 1,044 Likes on 762 Posts
Where did I mention if it was tuned properly or improperly? I said it was possible to run that leaner AFR because of DI, that is all, nothing more, nothing less. You are projecting Naji
Old Mar 15, 2007, 11:01 AM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 65 Likes on 49 Posts
13:1 might be what a GDI motor likes (which is close to max power gasoline AFR).

The Audi R8 runs 12.2:1 compression and 20psi of boost thru to 37.1mm restrictors on crap Elf fuel. I am sure that a normal compression GDI motor might be able to run leaner.
Old Mar 15, 2007, 11:09 AM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
h.funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lake O. Oregon
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get 200 miles to a full tank. How the heck do people get 300?
Old Jul 11, 2007, 05:51 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Freddy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 644
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
So it is a/f that plays a major factor.. Also should you run more or less timing in those low load cells?
Old Jul 11, 2007, 06:27 PM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Lucas English's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Well leaning out the map in the curse area is stupid the ECU will try and correct it back to a 14.7 and if you go far enough with the map it will toss a lean code.

I think some cars may have O2's that are off a tad causing leaner cruse o2 to get there killer mileage and others will have O2's on there way out that get the very crappy mileage. I have seen 3 evos now with dead front o2's and the ECU has not thrown a coed and is trying to dump a crap load of fuel to get the O2's up.

On my car I have the O2 turned off in the Ecu buy setting all my switch over load points to 10. I have it set to run a 15.0-15.2 on gas. I found if I went any leaner the car would lose some power and the mileage would not get any better. On my last 1500mi road trip I ran it as lean as a 16.0 on a whole tank but found that 15.2-15.5 gave better mileage and drove better.

Also with cars that have idle problems from intakes having the O2 off makes them idle much smoother. The Maf and O2 seem to start fighting each other. set the idle O2 in the 13.9-14.5 range

Also setting the maps to lean will also cause the car to drive like crap when its cold.

On my car on gas I got a avg of 26mpg on my 1500mi trip with one tank right at 29mph on a flat section.

On E85 I have my car tuned to a 15.5-16.0 AFR and it gets about 22mpg on the hwy cruse.

Even on my 1500mi trip with a few mt passes my AFRS were always with in 15.0-15.5 so the stock Ecu does great with the right fuel adj for different conditions. I always run Chevron 92. I guess if you were switching different gases a lot like some with 10% alc and others with out you may really need the O2 to keep things in check.
Old Jul 11, 2007, 07:15 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fusionchicken
leave it in gear, since when in gear and off throttle the injectors are shut off.

when u're in neutral ur engine's idling, so it's still using up fuel.

someone correct me if i'm wrong, thanks in advance.
From what I've logged the fuel only cuts out off throttle between 3000 and 1500. So, outside of that range it would, in theory, be better the shift to neutral.
Old Jul 11, 2007, 07:16 PM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
From what I've logged the fuel only cuts out off throttle between 3000 and 1500. So, outside of that range it would, in theory, be better the shift to neutral.

That may be the case in the IX, but on the VIII it pulls fuel at any RPM.

-Paul
Old Jul 11, 2007, 07:18 PM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TouringBubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Instead of keeping the ECU out of open loop longer, why not force open loop and tune the cruise AFR in the map? Or, has this been mentioned already and I'm just stating what we already know?
Old Jul 11, 2007, 07:32 PM
  #41  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
Instead of keeping the ECU out of open loop longer, why not force open loop and tune the cruise AFR in the map? Or, has this been mentioned already and I'm just stating what we already know?
That's what Lucas is doing.
Old Jul 11, 2007, 07:47 PM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Lucas English's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Other random info

-any leaner than a 17.0 the car will miss like hell
-once over 3500rpm the afrs need to start into the 14s or it will miss like hell
-I have not hurt anything yet in my lean cruse testing yet
Old Jul 11, 2007, 09:26 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
A418t81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been running in open loop for the past few months myself. I increased the coolant temp needed to reach closed loop to 103 deg C, I believe. The car does throw a CEL that cannot be held off by a C-reader or the like. I have leaned everything out up to about 90-100 load to ~15.5-16:1 or so, this includes rpm ranges over 3500 and my car has absolutely no problem with misfires in the 3500-4k range. The car drives exactly as it did before, there are no knock counts under load or during tip in. Fuel economy is GREAT. My tires are set to 38 psi all around, my wing is removed, and I average 300 miles to a tank (until the light comes on is considered a tank for me, approx 11.5-12 gallons added each and every time) doing a solid 85 mph the entire trip. I've averaged this time and time again. Very, very happy with fuel economy now.

Last edited by A418t81; Jul 11, 2007 at 09:31 PM.
Old Jul 11, 2007, 09:43 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 65 Likes on 49 Posts
A418, rather than use the minimum temp for closed loop method you might just set the open loop load #1 and #2 map. You wont get a CEL that might prevent you from seeing CEL for something you would like to see. Both tables directly refer to load % so if you want to enter open loop ONLY on the highway you could set them to 50% (approx average for highway cruise) or less if you want to idle lean.
Old Jul 12, 2007, 06:39 AM
  #45  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
juyanith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John, can you explain how the Open Loop Load #1 and #2 tables work? What I mean is when does the ECU use one or the other? If I understand what you've said correctly, this means that the stock fuel map is largely unused/unnecessary under a load of about 90 (down to 50 at higher rpms). This assumes you have the stock values of course. Funny enough, this is the portion of the map that simply has 14.7s in it.


Quick Reply: tune for better gas mileage?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 PM.