Notices
ECU Flash

open/closed loop.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #76  
jfitzpat's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
What would be cool is to use a wideband signal to replace the narrowband and rewrite some of the code for this stuff, but that won't happen until the ECU's rom is very well documented, and widely distributed efforts start happening.
Closed loop wideband is pretty cool. I've seen it first hand on a Megasquirt with a after market turbo Miata, and read about a lot of other success stories. In addition to quite a bit of hacking to the ECU code you need to look at the analog input as well. We can be programmed for a 0-1V linear wideband output, and other linear wideband outputs could be scaled with an op amp, but the analog input itself might have some physical filtering.

Stoich is actually a singularity on the sensor, the chemistry actually changes on each side of stoich. To stop from oscillating out of control, most systems that read the sensor implement some variant of a PID control loop. Sometimes an external filter is used to keep the software implementation simpler.

Even if this is the case, you might still be able to avoid physically modifying the ECU, provided you can find an alternate analog input you can re-purpose. For example, on some Subarus users re-use an analog input from the fuel system to log analog wideband measurements.

-jjf
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #77  
fixem2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: USA
SO can I clarify, should the Swap X-Y have a check or not? I am fighting an initial warm up lean condition in 1st and second gear. Upon acceleration in 1st gear when the car is first started it will stumble and the WB will read 16-17.3 around 1800 - 2400 rpm.

If I leave the Swap X-Y checked this follows the 60-80-100 load sites and where the AFR is highest in the map. Picture is below:
Attached Thumbnails open/closed loop.-enlean-map.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #78  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Can the car be made to run only in open loop, no matter what, and if so would it be detrimental to the car for any reason?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #79  
Tuner@Swift's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
I have my car running in open loop only, at the moment. I changed all the open loop load and rpm cells to 0. I'm using maft pro for partial throttle and WOT AFR tracking. I've set my idle rpm to 1000rpm and the idle AFR to 16.5:1. Part throttle and low load is 15.5:1 and WOT is 11.5:1. Transition from partial to WOT is smooth and fuel economy is increased.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #80  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
You are using AFR Tracking though, and that is similar to what closed loop does, so you don't really need it.

Yes, you can run the car in open loop, the easiest way is to set the coolant temp for closed loop operation higher than the engine temp could ever reach.

Here's the caveat, you will spend alot of time tuning the maps to get your AFR's into your target, if your target is a bit leaner for better economy, then the above post illustrates another valid way to have some sort of closed loop operation. However on the stock car, your target would be about 14.7 in closed loop regions, the cool thing is once you get all of that worked out, if you re-enable closed loop operation, you'll have almost perfect fuel trims. (this is actually one tuning method for part throttle and closed loop drivability)
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #81  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Be aware that disabling closed loop operation means that there may be some OBD-II tests that will never complete, so inspection might be a problem. Additionally you will no longer have any compensation for changes in weather or load, which are outside the compensation range for the MAF sensor. You would also get some poor drivability with the a/c on as you would have to tune for the additional load also.

Like i said earlier, keeping the car in open loop perminently isn't a great idea, but its a good way to tune the car properly.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #82  
fixem2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: USA
Any idea on the Swap X-Y issue?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 05:34 AM
  #83  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
thanks MJ.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SnailSpeed
ECU Flash
25
Oct 22, 2012 10:00 AM
R0b
Evo General
28
Mar 21, 2011 06:49 PM
stunt2
ECU Flash
8
Mar 19, 2011 05:04 PM
ezzey
AEM EMS
2
Oct 26, 2010 12:47 PM
mrfred
ECU Flash
43
Sep 29, 2009 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.