Load
Load
Hey guys. I've been out of the forums for a while now, and I was just wondering if anyone has figured out how to tell what load cell the ecu is in at any given time. I know most of the load calculations that are out there, but I'm looking for the actual load cell that the ecu is using. Thanks.
The actual load cell that the ECU is using is close to the calculated load value. That's the best most of us can do. I'd suggest doing a bit more reading as there are at least 3 or 4 threads on this exact topic.
Yes, I know that there are many other posts on this topic. However, although the calculated values discussed in these threads may be close and/or the best available method, I really would like to be able to see what the ecu is actually using. I heard some talk a few months ago about people doing research on the command to get this reading from the ecu. I was just curious as to if anyone has gotten any farther with this yet.
Yes, I know that there are many other posts on this topic. However, although the calculated values discussed in these threads may be close and/or the best available method, I really would like to be able to see what the ecu is actually using. I heard some talk a few months ago about people doing research on the command to get this reading from the ecu. I was just curious as to if anyone has gotten any farther with this yet.
Yes, I know that there are many other posts on this topic. However, although the calculated values discussed in these threads may be close and/or the best available method, I really would like to be able to see what the ecu is actually using. I heard some talk a few months ago about people doing research on the command to get this reading from the ecu. I was just curious as to if anyone has gotten any farther with this yet.
Look for the 2-byte load thread. It has the best currently available option.
-Paul
Found it.
Damn, after listening to those guys discuss the topic I think I will jam a screw driver in my eye because I feel so dumb and naive.
Great read, I just wish I had a little more knowledge on the programming side of things.
Damn, after listening to those guys discuss the topic I think I will jam a screw driver in my eye because I feel so dumb and naive.
Great read, I just wish I had a little more knowledge on the programming side of things.
Trending Topics
I fell the same way when I read posts from these two. I try do hard to follow, but then I give up and stop reading.I will just wait and see what the end result is.
I have an 8. That would be increadible if you could do that, but to be honest with you, I'm not sure I quite understand what "2-byte" load is. I know there's 8 bits in a byte and so on, but will 2-byte load display all load values from 0-320?
oh yeah I take for granted that people know bits and bytes 
1byte = 8bits = 0->255 decimal
because load wants fractions of a decimal those 255 are broken into fractions. 5/8ths to be exact.
i.e each 1 decimal = 0.625 Load
Load = 0->159 3/8ths (159.375)
now we want to know a lot more LOAD than that. so we need 2 bytes.
2bytes = 16bits = 0->65536 at 5/8ths resolution, will give us LOAD as at 0->40960
which is plenty large enough for any Turbo vehicle
lol
Once I have released EvoScan 0.98 with easy Power graphing and Easy Alarms, I'll add a facility to patch Evo7/8 ROMS to output 2 byte LOAD.

1byte = 8bits = 0->255 decimal
because load wants fractions of a decimal those 255 are broken into fractions. 5/8ths to be exact.
i.e each 1 decimal = 0.625 Load
Load = 0->159 3/8ths (159.375)
now we want to know a lot more LOAD than that. so we need 2 bytes.
2bytes = 16bits = 0->65536 at 5/8ths resolution, will give us LOAD as at 0->40960
which is plenty large enough for any Turbo vehicle
lolOnce I have released EvoScan 0.98 with easy Power graphing and Easy Alarms, I'll add a facility to patch Evo7/8 ROMS to output 2 byte LOAD.
Last edited by evo4mad; Dec 22, 2006 at 04:42 PM.
The problem is by doubling the range, your reducing the resolution..
But its not that important at low loads, and the higher loads really only have to be numerically close, its not hard to figure out where it goes after that point.
But its not that important at low loads, and the higher loads really only have to be numerically close, its not hard to figure out where it goes after that point.



