John can you post that xml for the IX your using, or just the code? I tried adding those values and I got a parse error

 

Scratch that, I got it. Didnt add the scaling to evo9base.xml

 

Yeah sorry I forgot to mention that the .xml in question was the base not just the rom type 13, 14, or 15.

 

I'm going to test the 1687 data now I'll post my results.

 

1680 Start- Antilag map Start
1682 Low -Antilag map cross over point
1685 medium -Antilag map cross over point
1687 everthingelse

1682 leans out low speed like taking off from a stop sign
1685 is midrange cruising at 60 and you stomp it
1687 is kind of weird there were a couple places I couldn't figure out why the afr was so rich with this set to 7000 as well as the others it stays on the antilag maps under any accelaration and my richness is gone.

 

Could someone please explain what 1680, 1682,1685 and 1687 stand for, am I correct in thinking these are map definitions?

 

Very interesting, now I need to go see how my IX handles all this in the 12xx addresses. When you said the other day that 1282/1682 made it act weird taking off and I was toggling it, it seemed to be better (in my IX anyway) with it set the same as the start rpm. More logging I guess.

 

Yes, map defs. Hang on though its likely to get kinda confusing in here in the next couple of days. It seems some "established" defs might need reestablished possibly.

 

Thanks John for the response, I have no problem waiting to stand on the shoulders of giants!

 

Is it possible that this "antilag" is not really "antilag" but more of a dependent fuel enrichment?

Also is it possible that instead of low speed, medium speed, and everything else the criteria might be low load, medium load, and high load? It has been my experience that mitsubishi much prefferes making changes such as this on a load dependent variable similliar to how it updates low, mid, and high fuel trims.

 

That is what I was thinking also but could not verify that 100%. The low and medium are definately correct though.

 

cliffnotes

 

Leanspool is not a separate function but apparently one of 3 functions. It would be interesting to see what JC has to offer on this since his car is JDM (I am not sure if it has the hardware or not though).

 

More accurately it's 3 sub functions of the main fuel program that can dramatically affect afr under different conditions. Atm it is believed that the settings represent lean spool/enrichment from the low med and high fuel trims. In other words these settings tell the ecu when to use the enrich/enlean maps.

 

That sounds like a much more accurate representation of what is possibly happening and what mitsubishi has done in the past. The apparently felt the need to provide different levels of enrichment during throttle tip in from different steady state load conditions. This is probably due to the fact that the evo turbos spool so very hard and the engineers were seeking a way to minimize tip in knock while keeping throttle response as crisp as possible.