In my testing last night, there were a few bugs I need to clean up, before emailing to everybody. But feel free to now download the current v0.98 from the last update email link that was sent to you. If you have lost your last update download link, you will be sent an email containing the download link once I tidy the bugs. Feedback on v0.98 is welcome. No bug reports please, I already know them. Have fun.

 

woO-HOo!











(...even though I dont have my email yet... )

 

no email but thanks for the update

 

Is there still a chance of getting the email today or is it gonna be delayed

 

I got evoscan .98 woot woot. but man it is a long list of logged items. I think next version should show most important to least important. Looks good evomad need to put my own warning wav in there though, I am not too fond of those generic ones in there.

 

Could someone please PM me the link to the new software. For whatever reason I'm not getting emails back. I have already purchased it, and have the S/N.

 

Same here, please PM link, thanks!

 

i purchased v0.97 and i dont have an email with a link i just have the email from paypal showing my payment. could someone pm me the update link?

 

Man I was testing evoscan .98 just now and it kept disconnecting and reconnecting for some reason. The previous versions never had that problem. When you get your link let me know if yours does the same.

 

could someone please pm me the link as well, thanks

 

I do not get emails either. How do I get on that list?

If you saved the page from your 0.97 download (your reciept that says Download here), all you need to do is look at what that is adding to the address in your browser and change it to the new version.

sorry I'll let the owner post the actuall link. I just was playing and found it. But my laptop is still down for the count so I can't play with it yet anyway.

 

Too late now you already posted that info lol, but EVOMAD said get it from the old link also.

 

no I mean I am not posting the full link to the download. People that have paid for it and have the key and reciept can figure it out

 

I don't remember which email I used when I purchased it Yay.

 

We've had this conversation several times. Evo Kid was confusing one wholly false myth created by you with another oft repeated sales BS based myth - which you reinforced in your response to him.

So I felt compelled to address both of them. I did not spend as much time on your invented analog slowness, since Donour had already independently reported the truth, but the second myth - that serial sample rates are a meaningful criteria, deserved more attention. Because, like many sales BS myth's, it seems seductively simple until you look closely.

And, like the Golden Rule, I'm a big believer in encouraging people to think and investigate for themselves. That is why I did not just explain the difference between reporting rate and actual stable measurement (data update) rate, I gave some easy examples people can try for themselves. A miss, or an ignition cut, are extreme, but they simply demonstrate the latency and stable response display that is always occuring.

In other words, I don't expect folks to believe me, I expect that to prove for themselves that, serially, an LC-1 is still a dramatically faster instrument. Remember 6-14* worst case translates into 12-28* nominal. Once you switch to our Analog outputs, like Donour, the speed gap is truly staggering. At that point you are comparing stable response time rates of .5 to 1.2 seconds with sub .005 second times.

It is probably worth noting that ultra high speed does not have to be analog. We have an OEM licensee of our measurement principle who is making digital measurements at a .010 second rate. The LC-1 serial data rate is 'MTS chain' compliant. The 12+ Hz default MTS rate was selected because it gives a Nyquest frequency better than 5 Hz, which is about as fast as you can change things with your right foot in a car.

It is also possible to run an MTS chain faster on a PC, but there has been surprisingly little call for it. Cranking up to, say, 100 Hz, makes sense for a few things, like a closed loop wideband implementation inside and ECU, but does not really make a difference in general tuning. Think about all the tuning that is done with 6 Hz ECU data - giving a Nyquest frequency of about 3 Hz. The next meaningful step about 5 Hz (sample rates of 10-15 times per second) is about 500 Hz (samples rates of 1000 Hz or higher), for things like suspension tuning. After that, you really need to look at specific crank angles - which is a whole different can of worms.

-jjf