Notices
ECU Flash

Can someone pls look at my log??

Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:41 PM
  #16  
vroomevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
that's too much knock...i wouldn't feel comfortable with that tunning...
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by nj1266
I think when "Bubba" tooned your car he set the timing too high and it continued from there. .
Old Bubba wuz smarter then u think. He owned a garage up at the top of that ther hill and after you felt that first kick in the overalls from turning the distributer clockwise 2 whole turns, he would be waiting fwith a brand new 350 he had in the back for 20 years with 100s more
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #18  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
He advanced the timing 720*? ITS NOT POSSIBLE...or is it?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 06:22 AM
  #19  
rish197's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: FLORIDA
Originally Posted by nj1266
Please look at your high octane igintion map and tell us what the timing is set at between load 200-240 for every rpm row.

Last edited by rish197; Mar 10, 2007 at 06:35 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 06:25 AM
  #20  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by 4TUN8
who ever tuned that car doesnt know wtf they're doing. The timing curve is god awful, there is consistant knock across the board and your fuel injectors are being pushed way past their limit
+1 thats crazy mad knocks.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #21  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
That timing map is way too agressive. I have a IX so this may not translate directly but it gives you an idea. I dont think your car is going to hit the targets on your timing map - at least not with that fuel and boost.

240

-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
3
3
3
4
5
5
6
6
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #22  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by rish197
As I suspected your timing is WAY WAY too aggressive. "Bubba tooning" at work I am sick and tired of these so called tooners and their damned addiction to timing advance. The idea that "a lot of advance makes more power" is bullocks. Sometimes LESS is more.

Last edited by nj1266; Mar 10, 2007 at 09:01 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #23  
EvoBroMA's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 1
From: MA
that poor engine... i would be pissed if i paid for that tune.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #24  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by nj1266
As I suspected your timing is WAY WAY too aggressive. "Bubba tooning" at work I am sick and tired of these so called tooners and their damned addiction to timing advance. The idea that "a lot of advance makes more power" is bullocks. Sometimes LESS is more.
Bollocks, engines need as much timing as they need for Mean Brake Torque. Generally at a given boost level its only possibly with high enough octane. Sometimes its better to run less boost and more timing than less timing and more boost. That is where a debate can start, though I do agree with you in everyway Naj.

Someone did rescale the map so they kinda have an idea of whats going on.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #25  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Bollocks, engines need as much timing as they need for Mean Brake Torque. Generally at a given boost level its only possibly with high enough octane. Sometimes its better to run less boost and more timing than less timing and more boost. That is where a debate can start, though I do agree with you in everyway Naj.

Someone did rescale the map so they kinda have an idea of whats going on.
I disagree. It is MTBT. Minimum Timing for Best Torque. Anything more than that is pointless. The best power from gasoline happens @ 12.5:1. The closer you are to that number the more power the car will make. Ofcourse this is theoretical and there are other factors that prevents the EVO from getting to 12.5:1. I have created a map that pulled timing and leaned out the AFR and it put down 312 hp on DLL with olny a TBE (hi flow cat). It is a 93 octane map and timing is around 16.5 peak and boost is 22 psi.

The Evo 8 is badly tuned to begin with. Running 21-22* of timing and 9.8 AFR in the top end is not my idea of a good tune. A good tune is what GM did with the GXP with 12* maximum timing and 12.5:1 AFR. Of course the car has direct injection, but the MS3 also has direct injection and is tuned like crap.

Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #26  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
The people who are saying that the timing in that map is too aggressive need to stop talking, you don't know what you're talking about.


His timing curve looks like a flashed ecu, a pretty normal one at that....Original poster, send me the full map and I'll try to find a problem, but right now I'm thinking you fux0red up your car.


I think a healthy evo will see 10 degrees of timing at peak boost rising to 20 degrees, plus or minus a few on pump gas. If you think 7 degrees of timing is a lot....oh lordy I'd hate for you to see my logs with 0 knock hah.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #27  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
if you think that's aggressive look at mine =p


Attached Thumbnails Can someone pls look at my log??-timing.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #28  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Naj you misunderstood what I was saying as there was sposed to be a period in there somewhere. Its spelled Bollocks not bullocks, my mistake for pointing that out. I get my terms (MTBT) confused sometimes but you knew the one I meant, thank you.

I agree that the tune is crap.

4TUN8, you are new here please show some respect. You can run as much timing as you want on whatever setup you want. There are lots of ways to do it. You can run meth, you can drown it in fuel, maybe your pumpgas is 94. I can buy 100 octane from a pump that I drive to so I spose that qualifies as pump gas as well. That timing map is aggressively advanced. Maybe its been awhile since you have seen a stock timing map for an VIII or IX. Thats about 13* more advance than stock. That is alot of timing.

I have run up to 9* of timing at 23psi on 92 octane with no or little knock. I then started experimenting with more boost on pump gas and have been successfully running 25psi at peak torque with 4 or 5* advance.

Running a bigger turbo and running cams changes all the parameters for what you can get away with. The timing that you run is tame compared to DSM's that have a 20G (I will go on a limb and assume you have cams for the power you have listed). At least on the west coast you cant run more than 4 or 5* (which is what his logs show timing being dropped to BECAUSE of knock) on 92/93. I respect that you might have ran alot of timing, but for whatever reason his car is not letting him. Fuel is obviously an issue, but the timing is still trying to get to 4 or 5* regardless.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #29  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by 4TUN8
The people who are saying that the timing in that map is too aggressive need to stop talking, you don't know what you're talking about.


His timing curve looks like a flashed ecu, a pretty normal one at that....Original poster, send me the full map and I'll try to find a problem, but right now I'm thinking you fux0red up your car.


I think a healthy evo will see 10 degrees of timing at peak boost rising to 20 degrees, plus or minus a few on pump gas. If you think 7 degrees of timing is a lot....oh lordy I'd hate for you to see my logs with 0 knock hah.
You can run timing that high if your car is tuned @ 10:1 in the high end like yours is. In the videos your car is spewing soot from the exhaust because it is so rich.

Your car is also heavily modified with an after market turbo and god knows what else.

Here is a pic that I took from the video. Your car run @ 10:1 which is not much different than stock.

Attached Thumbnails Can someone pls look at my log??-afr_10_1.gif  
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #30  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
"knock knock..." "who's there?"...seriously, throw in a Walbro...and get that tune cleaned up.
Did he say who tuned him?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:59 AM.