What is the max load are u seeing guys?
Jan 4, 2009, 07:29 AM
#111
88840017:
<table name="Set to 9 to remove load limit" address="2901a" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
Now I must turn my attention to some other MAF stuff, more requests for ECUs only if you are smashing against the 380 load limit please
<table name="Set to 9 to remove load limit" address="2901a" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
Now I must turn my attention to some other MAF stuff, more requests for ECUs only if you are smashing against the 380 load limit please
Jan 5, 2009, 12:23 AM
#116
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now to schedule a dyno session with Bryan and let him tune E85 plus meth injection.
Last edited by KevOVIII; Jan 5, 2009 at 12:26 AM.
Jan 26, 2009, 02:27 PM
#117
Mellon, for 96940011, try adding this to your xml and change the value from "2ba1" to "0x9".
<table name="Set to 9 to remove load limit" address="28140" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
I hope this allows higher than 380 load, pls check for normal behaviour, and that it registers the correct fuelling and timing from your maps though as there could be other limits or overflows in there.
I would just put the earlier tables I mentioned back to stock, no longer necessary, this disables their effect anyway.
<table name="Set to 9 to remove load limit" address="28140" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
I hope this allows higher than 380 load, pls check for normal behaviour, and that it registers the correct fuelling and timing from your maps though as there could be other limits or overflows in there.
I would just put the earlier tables I mentioned back to stock, no longer necessary, this disables their effect anyway.
<table name="Set to 9 to remove fuel limit" address="282C6" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
Original value will again be 2ba1, change to 9 as before.
If you are just kissing the 380 load limit, this will make no difference. If you are at 400 load then I would expect this would give you about 5% extra IPW. Without this change you would need to richen the fuel map zones over 380 progressively to keep the same AFR (assuming all else is equal such as fuel flow, MAF sensor calibration etc).
I think you should be good to go to the flow or electronic limits of the MAF sensor now, and I do not forsee any weirdness or overflows.
Please apply the new changes and let us know how you get on
