No MAF? No problem!
Awesome job Matt, I look forward to learning more about a cheap MAF delete option.
Could you take a moment to list (in very basic terms) the steps you forsee people taking in order to implement this? Basically, I'm just curious if there are complex physical/wiring changes that need to be made and/or complex ECU changes that need to be made, or if as simple as: Step 1) Remove MAF, Step 2) Flash ECU
Thanks.
Could you take a moment to list (in very basic terms) the steps you forsee people taking in order to implement this? Basically, I'm just curious if there are complex physical/wiring changes that need to be made and/or complex ECU changes that need to be made, or if as simple as: Step 1) Remove MAF, Step 2) Flash ECU
Thanks.
Awesome job Matt, I look forward to learning more about a cheap MAF delete option.
Could you take a moment to list (in very basic terms) the steps you forsee people taking in order to implement this? Basically, I'm just curious if there are complex physical/wiring changes that need to be made and/or complex ECU changes that need to be made, or if as simple as: Step 1) Remove MAF, Step 2) Flash ECU
Thanks.
Could you take a moment to list (in very basic terms) the steps you forsee people taking in order to implement this? Basically, I'm just curious if there are complex physical/wiring changes that need to be made and/or complex ECU changes that need to be made, or if as simple as: Step 1) Remove MAF, Step 2) Flash ECU
Thanks.
Now that's how you know you got it running good, when you can have that happen, and the car doesn't fall flat on it's face..
Very cool...
Now, I can do this to my car, take the turbo out, port it, and still drive the car back and forth to work while porting, he he...
Nothing quite like a 150hp max Evo...
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
OK, I have what is probably the final version of the MAP patch. I am now able to completely remove the MAF sensor input without dropping into limp mode or throwing a CEL.
I'll describe what is needed more in depth once I figure out what I am going to use for the baro and ait input without using the MAFT Pro. I'll probably lock the baro signal @ 3.5v and rescale the temp comp table to work with the GM AIT sensor.
I'll describe what is needed more in depth once I figure out what I am going to use for the baro and ait input without using the MAFT Pro. I'll probably lock the baro signal @ 3.5v and rescale the temp comp table to work with the GM AIT sensor.
Less dense would have an effect on pressure...yadda yadda yadda...maybe I answered my own question?
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
OK, I have what is probably the final version of the MAP patch. I am now able to completely remove the MAF sensor input without dropping into limp mode or throwing a CEL.
I'll describe what is needed more in depth once I figure out what I am going to use for the baro and ait input without using the MAFT Pro. I'll probably lock the baro signal @ 3.5v and rescale the temp comp table to work with the GM AIT sensor.
I'll describe what is needed more in depth once I figure out what I am going to use for the baro and ait input without using the MAFT Pro. I'll probably lock the baro signal @ 3.5v and rescale the temp comp table to work with the GM AIT sensor.
If you leave the MAF hooked up sitting somewhere out of the way in the engine compartment, you can use the baro signal to automatically compensate for elevation for the boost logging.
Last edited by mrfred; Aug 21, 2007 at 05:35 PM.



