Notices
ECU Flash

Problem with 1.31

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
burgers22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
From: Oxfordshire
Problem with 1.31

Hi

I have install 1.31, but now on my Evo 7 lots of the X and Y scales on the maps show jumbled numbers, most odd as 1.30 was fine.

Anyone else have this problem?

MB
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #2  
kreionic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
From: MD/ NY
I haven't even bothered with getting new ecuflash. Ever since I heard people were having issues 1.30. I am happy with my 1.29
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Me too. I am very happy with my 1.29a. I tried 1.30 and it did not work on my laptop.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by burgers22
Hi

I have install 1.31, but now on my Evo 7 lots of the X and Y scales on the maps show jumbled numbers, most odd as 1.30 was fine.

Anyone else have this problem?

MB
Tables for my VIII look ok. Haven't flashed with it yet though (it was this post that alerted me that 1.31 was out in the first place ).

Last edited by codgi; Aug 25, 2007 at 11:21 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
It might be because you didnt put your old updated Xml in with it and it doesnt have the proper definitions maybe?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #6  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
I put in my old definition and all the numbers were off, in the maps as far as rpm and load and things like that
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #7  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Seattle, WA
Hmm I suppose it depends on the definition. I windiff'd the default xml definitions for my rom from 1.30 and 1.31 and they were identical.

Did you guys keep the original copy of your rom's xml def from 1.30? Hmm I didn't save evo7base.xml from 1.3...might be interesting to see if that has changed for 1.31.

Last edited by codgi; Aug 25, 2007 at 11:33 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 01:55 AM
  #8  
burgers22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
From: Oxfordshire
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
It might be because you didnt put your old updated Xml in with it and it doesnt have the proper definitions maybe?
No it's not that, I changed the metadata folder in the options to point to my xml file folder, and also copied my xml into the standard evo folder. Most of the maps display Ok, but the axis values display as gobeldygook, as is the def file is wrok. Re installing 1.30 restores the views to normality. Other users have also reported this problem on JDM IXs.

MB
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 01:57 AM
  #9  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yup same problem here...

looks like its getting the bytes stuffed up by 1...

0x0001 in my old rom now equals 0x0100
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 05:36 AM
  #10  
jcsbanks's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
Maybe big and little endian are mixed up.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #11  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah I was thinking that as well - anyways im sure Colby will see this and rectify the issue
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
The values appear to be correct, it just looks like the cell blocks are too small to fit the value so you end up with 160... for something like 16000 (as seen in the MAF load)

My 1.31 Xml does not have level="1" in some of the tables also

Last edited by C6C6CH3vo; Aug 26, 2007 at 07:59 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah its an endian problem, from new evo9base:

<scaling name="Hex16" units="hex" toexpr="x" frexpr="x" format="%04X" min="0" max="65535" inc="1" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>

from old evo9base:
<scaling name="Hex16" units="hex" toexpr="x" frexpr="x" format="%04X" min="0" max="65535" inc="1" storagetype="uint16" endian="little"/>
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #14  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
My anti lag stop address is 1684 with 1.30, and 1682 with 1.31. What will this cause?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #15  
SoCalRedLine's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
ive been having this problem as well reading the Evo IX. I have the -15 ROM. When it reads from my ECU, the load cells are all messed up, showing some wierd numbers...going from 212xx to 212xx.5 etc.

anyone have a version of 1.30?

this is what my evo9base looks like:
from old evo9base:
<scaling name="Hex16" units="hex" toexpr="x" frexpr="x" format="%04X" min="0" max="65535" inc="1" storagetype="uint16" endian="little"/>

Last edited by SoCalRedLine; Aug 26, 2007 at 09:15 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:25 AM.