Notices
ECU Flash

Weird Dip in Load

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #1  
dudical26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Weird Dip in Load

I have been doing more tuning and recently experienced a dip in the load curve. It will peak at ~280 then dip down to 240 and then come back up to 260 before tapering off. This happened on every log now and it never used to happen.

I think, but am not sure if this is becuase of variations in boost. IF you look at the blue line in the graph which is boost, you will see it also dips down. I am working on fixing this but do you think the small dip in boost would cause a drastic change in load?

Here is a picture of what I mean
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
stefano's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO
boost leak is my first guess. check all your couplers.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
the TBEC map is causing that. I've been fighting that effect ever since the stock ECU solenoid control mods came out.

Basically, if you dial in an exact WGDC curve your boost is golden. You can then turn on TBEC and all is well. but, with changes in weather and such that WGDC curve is no longer accurate since WGD% will increase/decrease to meet the desired load/boost with different air density.

At this point, the TBEC table can correct for the difference, but it doesn't always do so smoothly.

The TBEC table is an offset of the WGDC curve, so it doesn't exactly work like closed loop control. Let me toss out some examples ...

WGDC = 60
TBEC = +2 to reach desired boost/load

WGDC goes up to 60.5, TBEC is still +2 ... so you are at 62.5 WGDC.

This problem occurs when the TBEC table and WGDC curves are essentially canceling each other out. the WGDC raises by 1% and the TBEC corrects with -1% ... At this point the load/boost error has to get far enough off for the TBEC to overcome the changes in the WGDC table.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #4  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Thats just from using ECU boost.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #5  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
I noticed a 9 I have been tuning is doing about the same thing. Its using a hallman MBC.....
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by ExViTermini
I noticed a 9 I have been tuning is doing about the same thing. Its using a hallman MBC.....
do you log boost ?? Usually it has to do with boost. The boost will spike, dip and then go back up, making the same thing happen to the load.

But the OP's log shows the boost curve and hit has not dips, so I dont know why load would......
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #7  
dudical26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
do you log boost ?? Usually it has to do with boost. The boost will spike, dip and then go back up, making the same thing happen to the load.

But the OP's log shows the boost curve and hit has not dips, so I dont know why load would......
Look closer at the blue trace, there is a dip in boost that pretty much correlates with the dip in load. I will have to try and tune boost to be a bit smoother.

I thought it was boost related, thanks to other ECU boost users for confirming this.

Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #8  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by dudical26
Look closer at the blue trace, there is a dip in boost that pretty much correlates with the dip in load. I will have to try and tune boost to be a bit smoother.

I thought it was boost related, thanks to other ECU boost users for confirming this.

But it looks like your dip in boost is minimal. Usually its a bigger dip that causes that kinda dip in the load.

Ill dig up some logs with similar behavior later
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #9  
dudical26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
But it looks like your dip in boost is minimal. Usually its a bigger dip that causes that kinda dip in the load.

Ill dig up some logs with similar behavior later
cool thanks. Although the scaling might be a bit deceiving, the load is only varying by around 20 which is not that bad. Also I should mention that I have the load offset by -100 so that 180 on the graph is really 280.

I found another log where the load goes wacky but the boost does not really seem to match the load as well as the first graph.


Last edited by dudical26; Nov 7, 2007 at 12:30 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #10  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
yeah, that load dip will only be around a 1.2 psi drop. Barely noticeable on that graph.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Perhaps when boost hit's at peak load the pressure is there but the airflow isn't. A log of airflow would confirm that

The second one is the same dip/rpm. Must be different gear

Last edited by C6C6CH3vo; Nov 7, 2007 at 02:24 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #12  
dudical26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Perhaps when boost hit's at peak load the pressure is there but the airflow isn't. A log of airflow would confirm that

The second one is the same dip/rpm. Must be different gear
I'll log airflow next time. I don't have the 2 byte setup but for now just the normal one.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #13  
dudical26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
I did another log with airflow being logged.

The boost is smoother on this run but the dip still happens....

Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #14  
Titanium's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Prescott AZ
Not to counteract you, TB, but in my boost tuning experience that spike/dip scenario was caused by the boost limit table, not TBEC. When I disabled the boost limit, that no longer occured, and I could tune boost with WGDC and TBEC without the dip.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #15  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Interesting ... I'll look in to it. If that's the case, the boost limit table does more than we expected ...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:55 PM.