Notices
ECU Flash

Official 2 byte thread!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #16  
evo828's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: Slovakia
96530006
2byte load
MUT 00 = 898a
MUT 01 = 898b


Note: as we know - there are several loads used within the ecu code - baro./temp compenstated, not compenstaed etc. ect. - the one above seems to match the load used for timing. Another address is 8984, 8985 which seems to be used as reference load for boost control.

Last edited by evo828; Feb 22, 2008 at 01:47 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #17  
roger smith's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura County, CA
Also note you're not required to log load on MUT00 and 01. You can log it from any MUT that isn't used. Same goes for any other parameter you want to log (RPM, airflow).

But setting a commonly used standard helps to avoid confusion.

I haven't confirmed this so maybe others can.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #18  
Chamama's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 404
Likes: 1
From: Bangladesh
ROM ID # 88570008
2Byte Load
MUT 00= 6B12
MUT 01= 6B13

2Byte Airflow (Not Tried yet)
MUT 04=6B6A
MUT 05= 6B6B
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #19  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by al\lupo
88840016 (and 99.9% 88840017):

2byte load
MUT 00 = 6B28
MUT 01 = 6B29

2byte RPM
MUT 02 = 6AFE
MUT 03 = 6AFF

2byte AirFlow (did not tried yet)
MUT 04 = 6074
MUT 05 = 6075
Don't mind 2byte Airflow, it is wrong for both version. I tried and it keeps at 255. Looking at the code it *seems* to be octane number rather than airflow...
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
ciobing's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by evo828
96530006
2byte load
MUT 00 = 898a
MUT 01 = 898b


Note: as we know - there are several loads used within the ecu code - baro./temp compenstated, not compenstaed etc. ect. - the one above seems to match the load used for timing. Another address is 8984, 8985 which seems to be used as reference load for boost control.
could you post your 2byte load 96530006 xml file?what must I do for to set ecuflash?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #21  
evo828's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: Slovakia
Originally Posted by ciobing
could you post your 2byte load 96530006 xml file?what must I do for to set ecuflash?
Attached is the zipped xml for 96530006 - remove all the other files beginning with 96530006 from the evo folder in Ecuflash.

I am attaching also a screenshot of what you need to have in the MUT table after opening and editing your ROM.
Attached Thumbnails Official 2 byte thread!-mut.png  
Attached Files
File Type: zip
96530006.zip (2.7 KB, 44 views)
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by roger smith
Also note you're not required to log load on MUT00 and 01. You can log it from any MUT that isn't used. Same goes for any other parameter you want to log (RPM, airflow).

But setting a commonly used standard helps to avoid confusion.

I haven't confirmed this so maybe others can.
I use these because thats what Evoscan is already setup for, and always has been. One less step, ya know? It doesn't NEED to be those ID's but why have to edit 2 things?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #23  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
2Byte RPM users, what improvements have you noticed with it, Particularily with logworks?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #24  
burgers22's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
From: Oxfordshire
98640014

MUT00 885C
MUT01 885D

MUT00 location to change is at 2E9E2
MUT01 location to change is at 2E9E6

MB
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #25  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by burgers22
98640014

MUT00 885C
MUT01 885D

MUT00 location to change is at 2E9E2
MUT01 location to change is at 2E9E6

MB
So if you added the entire 3D MUT table, you would only need to edit the MUT00 and MUT01 locations correct? And if you added only a 1D MUT Table you'd need to edit the addresses you listed above? I've always used the 3D table so I'm just making sure I understand the process.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #26  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I think adding the whole table is better, its one copy/paste and one address change.. and it gets people in the "right frame of mind" when talking about MUTs
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #27  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by tephra
I think adding the whole table is better, its one copy/paste and one address change.. and it gets people in the "right frame of mind" when talking about MUTs
I agree, and I've also used multiple MUT locations for testing things out, such as the ALT MAP ADC signal which came in handy.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 06:42 PM
  #28  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
96940011 MUT table:

3f314
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #29  
FuelsResearch's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
96420008

Load
MUT00- 8984
MUT01- 8985

Airflow
MUT04- 89E2
MUT05- 89E3

MUT Table- 39FA0

Bump for this question:
2Byte RPM users, what improvements have you noticed with it, Particularily with logworks?

Last edited by FuelsResearch; Feb 23, 2008 at 09:34 AM. Reason: Fix airflow boo-boo
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:40 PM
  #30  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by FuelsResearch

Bump for this question:
2Byte RPM users, what improvements have you noticed with it, particularly with logworks?
I haven't used logworks but its just more accurate readings. To the naked eye it may not look like much but once you start calculating different values along with it, the improvements/accuracies are probably more noticeable.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 PM.