PATCH: TephraMod V5
May 30, 2008, 02:26 AM
#676
SoCalRedline,
Try moving the valet limit to 8k. I've had this happen a couple times, works fine then doesn't start after the 2nd or 3rd flash and moving the valet limit up fixes it (even with valet mode off in options)
tephra, I'm surprised you had an issue with starting the car with the scaling being off. I have yet to install injectors that don't start right up even with the factory OEM scaling and latencies. Of course I scale them correctly after.
We had a 9 in the shop the other day getting RC1000 cc's installed. I turned the car on, out of the bay and drove it onto the dyno with no issues at all. All on factory scaling and latencies.
Try moving the valet limit to 8k. I've had this happen a couple times, works fine then doesn't start after the 2nd or 3rd flash and moving the valet limit up fixes it (even with valet mode off in options)
tephra, I'm surprised you had an issue with starting the car with the scaling being off. I have yet to install injectors that don't start right up even with the factory OEM scaling and latencies. Of course I scale them correctly after.
We had a 9 in the shop the other day getting RC1000 cc's installed. I turned the car on, out of the bay and drove it onto the dyno with no issues at all. All on factory scaling and latencies.
May 31, 2008, 01:08 AM
#679
Ok, this might sounds stupid and is probably low on the priority list. For V6/PID stuff would that take care of something like an option for 100% BCS duty at >1mph? I'm thinking this would be good for launching, even though its tough to build much more than ~8lbs on the stock IX turbo.
Even something that allowed you to lock the load that the BCS code sees at >1mph so you can get it by default would be pretty sweet, as long as it didn't raise or lower the correction amounts until you were moving.
A safeguard in case you go over target would be good just in case you installed some antilag i guess
.
Even something that allowed you to lock the load that the BCS code sees at >1mph so you can get it by default would be pretty sweet, as long as it didn't raise or lower the correction amounts until you were moving.
A safeguard in case you go over target would be good just in case you installed some antilag i guess
.
May 31, 2008, 09:06 AM
#680
Ok, this might sounds stupid and is probably low on the priority list. For V6/PID stuff would that take care of something like an option for 100% BCS duty at >1mph? I'm thinking this would be good for launching, even though its tough to build much more than ~8lbs on the stock IX turbo.
Even something that allowed you to lock the load that the BCS code sees at >1mph so you can get it by default would be pretty sweet, as long as it didn't raise or lower the correction amounts until you were moving.
A safeguard in case you go over target would be good just in case you installed some antilag i guess.
Even something that allowed you to lock the load that the BCS code sees at >1mph so you can get it by default would be pretty sweet, as long as it didn't raise or lower the correction amounts until you were moving.
A safeguard in case you go over target would be good just in case you installed some antilag i guess
.
Last edited by Viciouslord; May 31, 2008 at 09:09 AM.
May 31, 2008, 10:26 PM
#681
What new method is getting you twice the boost?
... my logs were pretty similar to the log i had seen from razorlab, but I'm only launching at ~5300In any case, I guess that makes this more viable. I'm not sure it integrates nicely into a PID system though
Jun 2, 2008, 02:45 AM
#683
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello Tephra
I've to report a strange "bug" with the 88840017 V5.5. I don't know if it's a bug in the patch or in ECUflash + patch.
Everytime I try to change a parameter and reflash I get the engine lamp blinking after the reflash. The car will not start (similar if you have a wrong Immobilizer I suppose).
I have to flash another ROM (like the 88840016 or an older one), start the car and then flash the V5.5 once again.
Do you have any clue what it can be?
I'm using EcuFlash 1.34. With the non-patched ROM it always worked.
Marzio
I've to report a strange "bug" with the 88840017 V5.5. I don't know if it's a bug in the patch or in ECUflash + patch.
Everytime I try to change a parameter and reflash I get the engine lamp blinking after the reflash. The car will not start (similar if you have a wrong Immobilizer I suppose).
I have to flash another ROM (like the 88840016 or an older one), start the car and then flash the V5.5 once again.
Do you have any clue what it can be?
I'm using EcuFlash 1.34. With the non-patched ROM it always worked.
Marzio
Jun 2, 2008, 07:47 AM
#685
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it's so, why the valet mode does not allow to start the car? It should actually start and be limited to the valet mode rpm, isn't it?
Thanks
mlocatel
Jun 4, 2008, 04:33 AM
#688
Dave, did you get chance to test the live mapping patch I posted for AUDM IX yet? At what version of your patch (if at all) do you want the live mapping to be incorporated?
