Notices
ECU Flash

more boost control tables found

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2008 | 07:59 AM
  #31  
roger smith's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura County, CA
Does anyone know the addresses of these other boost control tables for roms other than the evo 9?
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #32  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
I think this is correct for 96940011:
Code:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="3B14" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
    <table name="TPS" address="6002" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>

<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="56D2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
    <table name="Coolant Temp" address="5eae" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
</table>

<table name="Min Load for Boost Control" category="Turbo" address="578a" type="2D" level="1" scaling="Load8">
    <table name="RPM" address="596C" type="Y Axis" elements="16" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>
I'll look at 96530006 later, since that's more interesting to me nowadays.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #33  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
I believe I have two of the three for 96530006:
Code:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="448a" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
    <table name="TPS" address="6c2a" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>

<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="604e" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
    <table name="Coolant Temp" address="6ad6" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
</table>
I don't have IDA handy right now, so I don't have a reliable way of tracking down "Min Load for Boost Control" as it looks like the table contents change from ROM to ROM; at least, they're different between 96940011 and 88590015, and neither version's contents appear in 96530006 from what I can see. The RPM axis address is 0x6594, though.

Also, just in case you don't have a ThrottlePercentage scaling defined (it comes along for the ride with tephra's mods), add this chunk to evo7base.xml (for both 96530006 and 96940011):
Code:
<scaling name="ThrottlePercentage" units="%" toexpr="x/255*100" frexpr="x*255/100" format="%.0f" min="0" max="100" inc="1" storagetype="uint16"/>
I'm up against a time wall at this point, so won't have a chance to do any disassembly to look for this for a week and a half; anyone else want to take a crack at locating "Min Load for Boost Control" for 96530006? The 88590015 version is 8B 8B 90 A0 B0 B0 98 7D 75 75 6B 60 5B 4D 45 45, and the 96940011 version is 8B 8B 8D 8D 8D 8D 8E 89 87 87 87 72 6A 63 54 54.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #34  
roger smith's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura County, CA
Thanks for all the info, Logic
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #35  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Thanks Mr. Fred, That's great. Now I can turn on my positive correction and allow additional duty to get to desired boost without overrunning on the boost spike! In the past I only used the correction to remove duty. I had to tune my duty at a static level until I wanted it to increase to make up for taper. This actually ended up giving me great results but I think I lost a little spool since it's just a set duty 72% until it starts making up for taper, in contrast to the way the stock map runs 100% duty during spoolup.

Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; May 19, 2008 at 08:46 AM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #36  
skold's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Dublin,Oh
can you add this in the xml of a evo 8, 96420008?
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #37  
racer135's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by skold
can you add this in the xml of a evo 8, 96420008?
I would also like to know this.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #38  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Updated first post to cover more ROMs.
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #39  
fixem2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: USA
Anyone figure out below for 96530006 yet:

<table name="Min Load for Boost Control" category="Turbo" address="578a" type="2D" level="1" scaling="Load8">
<table name="RPM" address="596C" type="Y Axis" elements="16" scaling="RPM"/>
</table

Last edited by fixem2; May 25, 2008 at 11:44 PM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #40  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
For EDM:

EDM Evo 9 88840016/17

<scaling name="ThrottlePercentage" units="%" toexpr="x/255*100" frexpr="x*255/100" format="%.0f" min="0" max="100" inc="1" storagetype="uint16"/>

<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="3f34" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
<table name="TPS" address="738c" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>

<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="645a" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
<table name="Coolant Temp" address="7200" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
</table>

<table name="Min Load for Boost Control" category="Turbo" address="6542" type="2D" level="1" scaling="Load8">
<table name="RPM" address="6ca0" type="Y Axis" elements="16" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #41  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
are we going to include these in the new XML's?
Reply
Old May 26, 2008 | 12:03 AM
  #42  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
AFAIK, yes.
Reply
Old May 26, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #43  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tephra
are we going to include these in the new XML's?
Yep, just wanted to get some tables out there for people to use now because people have been asking me.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 05:42 AM
  #44  
burgers22's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
From: Oxfordshire
Update for 98640014 ROM for JDM Evo 7..

<scaling name="ThrottlePercentage" units="%" toexpr="x/255*100" frexpr="x*255/100" format="%.0f" min="0" max="100" inc="1" storagetype="uint16"/>

<scaling name="OffsetWGDC" units="WGDC Change" toexpr="(x-128)/2" frexpr="x*2+128" format="%.1f" min="-64" max="63.5" inc="0.5" storagetype="uint8" endian="little"/>


<table name="Max Total Upward Correction" category="Turbo" address="42dc" type="2D" level="1" scaling="OffsetWGDC">
<table name="Y axis" address="52ce" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #45  
sub7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 5
From: Kuala Lumpur
Thanks mate. This is my default value, did I get them right?
0 0.0
13 0.0
25 0.0
38 0.0
50 0.0
63 0.0
75 0.0
88 10.0
100 10.0
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 PM.