more boost control tables found

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 4, 2009 | 09:13 PM

#61

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExViTermini

Just added in the new tables for 0014/0015 and in the max upward, the right column wasn't visible and was nothing but about two dots. I have just installed the boost mods and haven't utilized them yet, but had to change the endian to big in the copied over values for my setup.

I had to go back and change the OffsetWGDC endian to little, while leaving the other 3 alone, in order for the right column to show up..

All endians either need to be big or little depending on your ECUFlash version. The address for the right column is wrong in the patch for the 94170015 rom. The correct address for the offsetWGDC is 4478.

May 4, 2009 | 09:29 PM

#62

shadow1

Evolved Member

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 660

Likes: 0

From: Laurel, MD

For 94170014/15: the scaling is wrong. It should read:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
<table name="TPS" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>

Oct 23, 2009 | 11:21 PM

#63

ace33joe

Evolving Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 394

Likes: 7

From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul

Did anyone find "min load for boost control" table for 941700xx maps?

Nov 16, 2009 | 09:20 PM

#64

Evo_Jay

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,419

Likes: 14

From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)

Im trying to add these tables to 96420011 but got a couple problems

On the "max total upward" I cant find the right address and/or scaling for TPS (left side).

Now on the max wgdc vs coolant temp, both sides are wrong.

here is the .xml data Im using.

Code:

	<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
		<table name="TPS" address="6b3a" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
	</table>

	<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="56d2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
		<table name="Coolant Temp" address="5eae" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
	</table>

Nov 17, 2009 | 04:15 AM

#65

daymean

Evolving Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 106

Likes: 0

Are any of these tables defined for 96260009?

Nov 17, 2009 | 09:56 PM

#66

Evo_Jay

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,419

Likes: 14

From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo_Kid

Code:

	<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
		<table name="TPS" address="6b3a" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
	</table>

	<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="56d2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
		<table name="Coolant Temp" address="5eae" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
	</table>

bump

Jan 5, 2010 | 03:40 AM

#67

Danieln

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 563

Likes: 0

From: EUROPE

Anyone has those tables for 88570007 or other JDM IX roms?

Thanks

Jan 5, 2010 | 05:30 AM

#68

rolly1818

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 1,507

Likes: 2

From: Trinidad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danieln

Anyone has those tables for 88570007 or other JDM IX roms?

Thanks

X2

i think we need to work together in getting 8857 in order.

Jan 5, 2010 | 06:16 AM

#69

Danieln

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 563

Likes: 0

From: EUROPE

Hi mate,

Definitely the info is somewhere......

Good to have a partner in this.....

Sep 16, 2010 | 02:33 PM

#70

VGergo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 566

Likes: 1

From: Hungary

Hello

so if my max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table set to 0 than my Boost error correction table can not work if the boost is lower as the desired ? For example If I set max upward at 100% tps to 5% , in the boost error corr table -2.4psi I have 6% and my boost error psi -2.4 than the ecu can raise the wgdc by 5% only ?

Sep 16, 2010 | 02:57 PM

#71

nonschlont

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 1,760

Likes: 2

From: Ca

Quote:

Originally Posted by VGergo

if u set the "max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table" to 0, you wont get ANY positive correction! So if you set it to 5%, you will get up to 5% correction. Once u get the tune nailed down w/ out correction, I find 5% works well.

Sep 16, 2010 | 03:11 PM

#72

VGergo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 566

Likes: 1

From: Hungary

I think the same

thank you

May 1, 2013 | 08:39 PM

#73

limaynard

Evolving Member

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 282

Likes: 4

From: Sydney

I have read through this and thought I had it nailed.

Set the BWGDC to what I thought was about right and added values in the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but only over 62.4% TPS. I thought that this would mean no WGDC upward error correction until TPS was over 62%...

But I have found that WGDC is inline with the BWGDC table at high loads and increases in line with the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but is way above WGDC at low loads.

I would expect that the WGDC would be the close to the BWGDC at low loads and below the TPS where upward correction should occur...

I will do some more logging and check but it looked odd...