Notices
ECU Flash

27.5 psi on 91 octane maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2008 | 04:37 AM
  #16  
racer135's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
There seems to be big jumps in AFR from 2000 to 2500 RPM at hiher loads. Are you running lean spool enable from 2500 up?
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #17  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Good info man! What AFR does this yield, do you have any dyno plots of boost and afr? Or power numbers on this setup for that matter?

Awesome info man.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 07:30 AM
  #18  
BiFfMaN's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 468
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas
Gratz B!
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #19  
honki24's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by scheides
Good info man! What AFR does this yield, do you have any dyno plots of boost and afr? Or power numbers on this setup for that matter?

Awesome info man.
lol... His first post answers all questions. https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=340451

~11:1AFR

Last edited by honki24; May 15, 2008 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #20  
roger smith's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura County, CA
I saw you have Max WGDC correction but your car isn't an evo 9. Where did you get the definitions? I've been wanting to try but I've only been able to find evo 9 definitions.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #21  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
Good stuff, I started running huge boost on straight pump gas last year. Everyone told me I was crazy. If the AFR's look good, the torque curve looks good, and the knock sum is looking good....keep cranking. That's what I think anyway.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #22  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by razorlab
I've found you need to bring back in upward correction when you set the Max Upward Correction Vs TPS down to 0. This table has created a huge jump in dialing in ECU boost to be even more solid. With it set at zero, the WGDC will never go over BWGDC. No more crazy overboosts with error correction!
Nice. I have been gone a sec. Didnt even know of this map. Great to see ECU boost control is even better.

Again props to Bryan, one of the best ECU tuners out there.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:54 AM
  #23  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by razorlab
I've found you need to bring back in upward correction when you set the Max Upward Correction Vs TPS down to 0. This table has created a huge jump in dialing in ECU boost to be even more solid. With it set at zero, the WGDC will never go over BWGDC. No more crazy overboosts with error correction!
That's good to know, i guess i missed it somewhere along the way.
Except what happens when it gets hot and your BWDGC isn't enough for desired boost?
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #24  
Magnumpsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: Who Knows
Razor your information is awesome!

You kick ***. It is so refreshing to see people posting there information and data found.



Mitch M
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #25  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by mplspilot
That's good to know, i guess i missed it somewhere along the way.
Except what happens when it gets hot and your BWDGC isn't enough for desired boost?
I would prefer it to run slightly less boost in hot conditions, but that's just me.

You can also add a little bit WGDC upward correction instead of zeroing it out. Stock is 10, so 1-3 and slightly different error table would probably work for what you are thinking.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #26  
spdracr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: LA
when i put in my green i plan on doing a similar tune with mucho boost. i did this not to long ago on my stock 8 turbo and it sucked lol couldnt hold boost and it just ran out of breath
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
does 91 really make that much a knock **** area 100-160 areas compared to 92.
because my 92 map timing looks exactly like yours uptop 240-280load.
but holy cow your miiddle ares is way rich and way less timing??????????/
seems you could lean it out a little bit by 0.3 points and add 1-2 more timing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
razorlab
ECU Flash
20
Oct 13, 2008 03:31 PM
roger smith
ECU Flash
3
Sep 18, 2007 04:03 PM
akemi27
Midwest Region
5
Apr 11, 2006 09:36 PM
evolusion
Motor Sports
6
Jan 17, 2006 06:42 AM
Smogrunner
Automotosports - Illinois
5
Nov 28, 2005 04:05 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.