nonschlont

iTrader: (3)

bump for any ideas? ^^^

tephra

iTrader: (6)

what is in your MUT41 table?

nonschlont

iTrader: (3)

thanks for the response tephra.
when I get home, I will check it out... I didnt check, but then again, I dont know whats supposed to be in the table anyways.

nonschlont

iTrader: (3)

request id 41 in my MUT Table is "6A9B"

tephra

iTrader: (6)

yeah it needs to be 0x840B

nonschlont

iTrader: (3)

thank you, once again! Happy Holidays!

raasfaas

iTrader: (30)

Hey Tephra could you take a look at this and tell me what i'm doing wrong, I also want to do the 2 byte to 1 byte mod so I entered this piece of code in my car's ROM definition:
<table name="2byte to 1Byte Load Factor" category="Mods" address="481b8" type="1D" scaling="1bytefactor"/>
I changed the unit value to 1.2 and then I entered this piece of code in my evoscan's data.xml file:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load 1Byte" LogReference="Load1B" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
And I also changed the value in my MUT table request id 41 to 0x840b.
But when log a run It records 2byte and load calc but no 1 byte...the value is constant. any ideas?

tephra

iTrader: (6)

u using v5.10?

what romid?

raasfaas

iTrader: (30)

Well actually for now I just wanted to do the 2byte to 1byte load mod and then later on do the v5.10...I'm in the learning phase
ROMID 88590015

tephra

iTrader: (6)

u can't - the 5.10 is the base

raasfaas

iTrader: (30)

oh my bad, I didn't know that. So does this mean that the 2 byte load reading is inaccurate or just not as accurate as the 1 byte.
I'm not very familiar with all the terms as yet so bare with me if I sound a little hesitant. Do I just cut and paste the code for the v5.10 into my ROM definition or do I have to use the one that is supplied with the upgrade?

tephra

iTrader: (6)

1byte load is actually *slight* less accurate than 2byte load.

the advantage is you only have to log 1byte, so logging speed is increased AND you don't get high byte/low byte mismatch problems.

Jack_of_Trades

iTrader: (17)

So what is the range/resolution of the 2-byte load? Is the only difference between the logging speed the difference between logging a single item (1-byte load) compared to the logging speed of logging 2 seperate 1 byte items (2 byte load)?

tephra

iTrader: (6)

and you dont get high/low byte mismatches (spikes in the graph)

iTune

iTrader: (3)

2byte load actually reads a little higher that 1byte load i have noticed. The higher the load, the more the difference can be seen. Is there a way to fix that?