Notices
ECU Flash

cold start enrichment table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #61  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by mrfred
First post updated.
I don't see:

<table name="Start IPW latency mcsec" address="1569" type="1D" level="1" scaling="McSec"/>

for 0015 rom...
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #62  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by razorlab
I don't see:

<table name="Start IPW latency mcsec" address="1569" type="1D" level="1" scaling="McSec"/>

for 0015 rom...
Still working on finding all the relevant tables. For the Evo 9, the rabbit hole is pretty deep for this startup enrichment stuff.

Last edited by mrfred; Jun 16, 2008 at 09:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #63  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
ah ok, take your time.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #64  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
OK, here is what I found for 96940011.
Have you found:

"<table name="Start IPW latency mcsec" address="1569" type="1D" level="1" scaling="McSec"/>"

For 96940011?

Would love to test it out on my car.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #65  
amak87's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
This just helps out the cold start? Like, driving right after you start up the car? or during idle warm up? My car has cams, and starts up fine (usually), but idle's kinda funky for the first 15secs or so.. I messed around with the ISCV tables and its a little smoother now..

But before I touched my ISCV tables...

Here's my question, with my car, fully warmed up, AC off, the car idles normally (about 1050rpms) and at the same rpm consistently, but sometimes the sound gets all lopey?? but it only happens for a few seconds at a time, then goes away.

When I turn my AC on, at idle, the target idle changes to about 850rpms, and my car idles slightly lower with AC on (around 950rpms), but sounds just like stock, and is so so smooth. No lopeyness, no bumpiness, just smooth idle, doesnt even sound like cams at all.

Now, how can I get my normal idle, without AC on, to do this?

I can post my ISCV tables, but they are now different from what I just described..

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #66  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
This is more about what is happening when the starter is engaged.

The ISCV tables are starting points for the idle air flow valve stepper motor. The target idle tables are what you want to change along with the ISCV values, but the target idle tables in the current version of ECUFlash are incorrectly defined. There is a thread somewhere in this forum on how to find the correct tables.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #67  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by razorlab
Have you found:

"<table name="Start IPW latency mcsec" address="1569" type="1D" level="1" scaling="McSec"/>"

For 96940011?

Would love to test it out on my car.
It appears to be address 1169.


Eric
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #68  
amak87's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
Originally Posted by mrfred
This is more about what is happening when the starter is engaged.

The ISCV tables are starting points for the idle air flow valve stepper motor. The target idle tables are what you want to change along with the ISCV values, but the target idle tables in the current version of ECUFlash are incorrectly defined. There is a thread somewhere in this forum on how to find the correct tables.
Well, are you just talking about the "Actual Desired Idle" mod? Or are there more? Could you point me in the right direction please?

And how will this mod affect my idle? What does it fix/help?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #69  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I don't know where the thread is. You'll have to search for it. The thread should have the correct idle tables so that you can change your idle.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #70  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
It appears to be address 1169.


Eric
That looks right, gives me 432. thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #71  
amak87's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
So the table edit in the first post still needs some work? can anyone post the final version for the 0015 rom? And will the stock injector latency values be the same if I have larger injectors? I had my injectors scaled by someone else a while back. My number (14v) is like .936 instead of .432 ??
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #72  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by amak87
So the table edit in the first post still needs some work? can anyone post the final version for the 0015 rom? And will the stock injector latency values be the same if I have larger injectors? I had my injectors scaled by someone else a while back. My number (14v) is like .936 instead of .432 ??
Not sure if you're aware, but finding these kinds of tables and understanding what the tables do is not a simple as chewing gum. There are only a few people on the forum who are doing this kind of thing, and its all in our spare time and done generally for free. But to answer your question, the table in the first post is correct and complete. There is, however, some discussion as to whether there are additional tables relating to cold start (starter cranking) for this ROM. So far, I have not seen any as I work my way through all the fuel routines.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 04:11 PM
  #73  
topnitroracer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
I have experienced a couple of the issues outlined in this thread (PTE 780cc). I had the warm start issue too and I thought there was a chance it was leaky injectors. After some investigation I am almost positive this is not the case. Anyhow I have messed with the fuel table and the IPW adder for startup and it is pretty much completely fixed. I ended up subtracting fuel at a couple of the values in the middle of the temperature range (34C and 50C).

I also experience the lean condition on cold drive off. With what I experience there has to be a table to describe the IPW adder for a running condition in the IX. It is only when it is cold and really only takes about 30-45 seconds to go away, less the warmer the car is.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #74  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
First post in this thread has been updated with data showing that the observed IPW values during startup are dead on with the table values. For Evo 9s, the table definition I listed in the first post is the table to use to adjust startup enrichment control.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #75  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
It appears to be address 1169.


Eric
Decided to take a look at this. The value stored at this address corresponds to the 432 mcsec, but this address is never called in the 96940011 ROM, so the value is never used.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:27 PM.