Notices
ECU Flash

Evoscan v2.4 fixes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2008, 05:25 PM
  #31  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
ok - are your calculated values (ie IDC and EVOLC1) configured BEFORE this new one?
Old Jul 23, 2008, 05:36 PM
  #32  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
dan l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My LBS/Min is the very first thing I log. Are you saying that I have to move it down the screen a bit?
Old Jul 23, 2008, 05:53 PM
  #33  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yeah - you need to log your pre-requisites first. So put that new definition after EVOLC1 and IDC...
Old Jul 24, 2008, 10:22 AM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
evo4mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TGA, New Zealand
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you can just use the word CALC in the request Id, but you dont want the the car ecu to timeout, so yeah sending a dummy requestid is probably the best way to go anyway.

Originally Posted by dan l
Don't have one in my formula. I just put a dummy 12 in my current request. I'm using allready calculated values to do a further calculation.
Old Jul 24, 2008, 10:28 AM
  #35  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
evo4mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TGA, New Zealand
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah WickedE i'm frustrated by it too, trying to fix minority issues causes other issues lol. I added the "disable multithreading" to the logging menu new in v2.5 so give it a go to get any lost speed, by the extra thread, back. I seriously think v2.5 is now better than v.99, and you're right I can't say that for some of the releases in between. But I now get less support calls for v2.4/2.5 than I did for v0.99 so v2.5 is definately much better. Now I think more testing needs to be done around Maptracer and Wideband logging, so thats next on my list, a lot more LC1s are now supported in v2.5 than v0.99.

Originally Posted by Wicked E
Time for AEM... These revisions and adding of stuff while no clean version has been released since .99 is aggravating... Sorry, just venting...

-E
Old Jul 24, 2008, 02:52 PM
  #36  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
magyar86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: league city, texas
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry if this has already been discussed but how about making log ids that use the 2-byte pre-requisites. like idc, whp, torque, etc. so ppl dont have to change the existing evals back and forth for when they are logging cars that dont have the 2-byte rom mods. sorry if i dont have the right terms but hopefully your understand what i mean...
Old Jul 24, 2008, 03:49 PM
  #37  
Evolving Member
 
fryedchikin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please fix the Enable Start/Stop by Alarm Triggers.
Old Jul 24, 2008, 04:16 PM
  #38  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
dan l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V2.4 is working good for me. Its one of the better versions. One bug that I've noticed when clicking on things like MUT2Byte RPM or in this instance Fuel Consumption when graphing. Here is a picture of the error and evoscan locks up:
Attached Thumbnails Evoscan v2.4 fixes-evoscanerror.jpg  
Old Jul 24, 2008, 05:17 PM
  #39  
Evolving Member
 
fryedchikin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have encountered numerous errors with the graphing too, I thought it was just something with my setup. When those errors do occur I have to use task manager to quit the application and restart, the error handling really needs to be improved.
Old Jul 24, 2008, 05:47 PM
  #40  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
dan l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it locks it up good, real good. You can kill the boxes but it won't do you any good. You need to cntl-alt-del to kill it.
Old Sep 13, 2008, 12:13 PM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Thoe99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,199
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by dan l
...One bug that I've noticed when clicking on things like MUT2Byte RPM or in this instance Fuel Consumption when graphing. Here is a picture of the error and evoscan locks up:
Anyone find a fix for this?
Old Sep 13, 2008, 07:12 PM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I'm pretty sure the reason the fuel consumption wont graph is because when you let off the gas and coast its an infinite value, which it cant log.
Old Sep 14, 2008, 06:52 AM
  #43  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
evo4mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TGA, New Zealand
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I fixed the Innovate LC1 logging on the weekend, and also added a LC1 recalibration feature to the EvoScan menu. I will release it later this week.

I was thinking about capping the Wideband results to "20" so that the graph doesn't go out of scale so easily. Do any of you run AFRs greater than 20 that I should know about?
Old Sep 14, 2008, 09:02 AM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
21:1 AFR is usually the highest any of the WB setups read. What about the fuel consumption graphing? Can you make a cap on that too?
Old Sep 14, 2008, 03:48 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Asmodeus6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely need to cap the WB at 20. Most don't read below 8 or 9 either. One of the problems I encountered when trying to build a gauge panel was reconfiguring the scale after I assigned an input. Even after you had it up and running, if you saved it. Reloaded ES, it would error its a** off and dump all my gauges back to th originals. IE useless.

Honestly this is the FIRST version of ES that has even WORKED for me AT ALL since I picked it up almost a year ago. Its only version that will log without disconnecting every 2 seconds. So I'm not complaining. I gave up on it and used logworks up until maybe 3 days ago. Wiped every trace of ES off the computer, and gave 2.4 a shot. And it finally works. None of the others did.

Could be me, or my laptop... but this one works. ? So, yay!


Quick Reply: Evoscan v2.4 fixes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:58 PM.