Notices
ECU Flash

EvoScan v2.6 Beta11 now supports EvoX and OpenPort2.0 datalogging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #16  
mac214's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: All Over
Thanks, I will load this up and try out the Uego.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:02 PM
  #17  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
Are these options correct for the fastest logging? I'm using a 1.3 cable, have 1 byte load selected, 2 byte rpm, and the other normal stuff. During a pull I'm getting 400 rpm gaps. Is this normal? The gaps don't start happening until 5k or so. I couldn't get the map tracer to work either. I was able to load my hex to the bottom portion, but what ever option I selected from the left wouldn't show up in the upper area.
Attached Images  

Last edited by lan_evo_mr9; Apr 14, 2009 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:07 PM
  #18  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
Here's an image of the maptracer
Attached Thumbnails EvoScan v2.6 Beta11 now supports EvoX and OpenPort2.0 datalogging-maptracer.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #19  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
looks correct.

dont use 2byte rpm, its really a waste of time... the regular (MUT21) RPM is fine..

how many items are you logging?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #20  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
10 max- usually 8
Should I put my MUT table for RPM back to normal instead of 2 byte? That may be a dumb question, but I have no idea about that kinda stuff

Last edited by lan_evo_mr9; Apr 14, 2009 at 07:13 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #21  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
you should be logging a lot faster - can you post up a log?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:24 PM
  #22  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
here ya go. Line 350ish is where it gets choppy. Make that 360ish.
Attached Files
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #23  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Ok your getting about 4 lines/rows per second.

I used to get 20...

What sort of hardware/laptop are you using? What is your CPU utilisation when logging?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #24  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
HP Pavillion Vista, 2G RAM, 160 GB Hard drive. I have never checked the CPU utilisation when logging. I have tried different power settings when logging and it didn't matter. How do I check utilisation and how do I reduce it?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:34 PM
  #25  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Yeah that should be fast enough.

Even when I had mine cranked RIGHT DOWN (power settings) I was still ok for logging.

I am XP thou.

Task Manager is CTRL-SHIFT-ESCAPE (together)
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:36 PM
  #26  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
I have the little gadget gauges on my desktop. The RAM one is always at 46% and the ROM one is usually around 6%. I may have my terminology mixed up.
Edit: I just checked the CPU usage with just evoscan on and it was 4% or lower.. Not sure with it running though.

Last edited by lan_evo_mr9; Apr 14, 2009 at 07:40 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #27  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
well CPU will go up and down pretty quickly all the time.

like open word and it will jump to 100% for a little bit.

yeah I would be suprised if it was CPU related...

Hrmm maybe vista something?!?!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #28  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
anybody can email me link to v.2.5??

i was trying to download it from an email notification i got from Hammish when it came out but linky doesnt work

thanks in advance
________________
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #29  
evo4mad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: TGA, New Zealand
log a support ticket at www.evoscan.org/helpdesk you can get a copy sent to you.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:39 PM
  #30  
oldevodude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Hamish,

Is the LC-1 functioning in Vista 32 now with Beta 11?
I suppose I could test
let me know thanks
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 PM.