Notices
ECU Flash

How does this E85 Timing Map look?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #1  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
How does this E85 Timing Map look?

This is from a local tuner not on the boards...Car has a BBK Full turbo at 30 psi spike, kelford IX 272's, all other bolts ons. I know the injector scaling is way off but how does this timing map look? Ill find out later tonight what load Im spiking to and holding. Also, it seems that most people run a 12.0 AFR on E85. Is that what most are still doing?

Thanks

Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #2  
nonschlont's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Ca
I dont run E-85, but I would say there is a lot of room left at peak tq. I run more pk timing than you on 91. 4*

I did just read your other thread, so maybe because of the knock issue...
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
Yes this map was made with STOCK knock sensor settings. I think he just used clean runs, or at least as clean as he could get.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #4  
lan_evo_mr9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 2
From: MD
Go to the alternative fuel section and look at the timing maps there. You should get a pretty good idea of what is capable.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #5  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by nonschlont
I run more pk timing than you on 91. 4*
At 30psi?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #6  
nonschlont's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Ca
good point!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #7  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by house_of_senate
This is from a local tuner not on the boards...Car has a BBK Full turbo at 30 psi spike, kelford IX 272's, all other bolts ons. I know the injector scaling is way off but how does this timing map look? Ill find out later tonight what load Im spiking to and holding. Also, it seems that most people run a 12.0 AFR on E85. Is that what most are still doing?

Thanks


Actually looks pretty good........
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #8  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
Thanks for the replies everyone, so no suggestions to change anything? Keeping in mind that I dont really have any knock control so no knock sums to go off of. Not that it would be that helpful on E85 anyway. Also, 12.0 is still what most of you are using for a E85 AFR?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #9  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
I don't notice much of a power loss running as rich as low 11's on E85. E85 is more of a coolant than gasoline is.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #10  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by house_of_senate
Thanks for the replies everyone, so no suggestions to change anything? Keeping in mind that I dont really have any knock control so no knock sums to go off of. Not that it would be that helpful on E85 anyway. Also, 12.0 is still what most of you are using for a E85 AFR?
Why do you not have any knock control?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #11  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
Why do you not have any knock control?
My other thread.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-problems.html
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 05:50 AM
  #12  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Don't use ethanol for fuel, but from any research done on it regarding it's burn characteristic for load vs RPM I read that is has a more linear relationship. Basically when compared to gasoline, it's burn rate changes less, so at redline timing isn't advanced as much relative to peak VE. A flatter timing profile. This is just on paper though
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 07:41 AM
  #13  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
So no suggestions for any changes then? Anyone?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 10:12 AM
  #14  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Dude, you shouldnt ask for suggestions based on the picture of the map. Map doesnt tell much, except a general idea. There need to be at least logs/graphs to see how smooth you timing changes with RPM and there def needs to be tuning to see how YOUR car responds to timing changes..
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #15  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
im on meth, but your peak torque numbers are same/lower than my pump 92 gas.
Now uptop your timing looks good I myself am around 22 at 7500RPM.
I say change your 3's to 5 and you still should be very safe.
question is what a/f are you running at?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:13 PM.